Capturing the conversation of trust research

References

• Bachmann, R. (2011). At the crossroads: Future directions in trust research. Journal of Trust Research, 1(2), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2011.603513
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. C., Saparito, P., & Belkin, L. (2011). Responding to trust breaches: The domain specificity of trust and the role of affect. Journal of Trust Research, 1(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2011.552438
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, G. (2011). Going back to the source: Why do people trust each other? Journal of Trust Research, 1(2), 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2011.603514
   Google Scholar
• Elhardt, C. (2015). The causal nexus between trust, institutions and cooperation in international relations. Journal of Trust Research, 5(1), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2015.1007459
   Google Scholar
• Frederiksen, M. (2014). Relational trust: Outline of a Bourdieusian theory of interpersonal trust. Journal of Trust Research, 4(2), 167–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2014.966829
   Google Scholar
• Fulmer, C. A., & Dirks, K. (2018). Multilevel trust: A theoretical and practical perspective. Journal of Trust Research, 8(2), 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2018.1531657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haukkala, H., Vuorelma, J., & van de Wetering, C. (2015). Trust in international relations–A useful tool? Journal of Trust Research, 5(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2015.1008009
   Google Scholar
• Høyer, H. C., & Mønness, E. (2016). Trust in public institutions–Spillover and bandwidth. Journal of Trust Research, 6(2), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2016.1156546
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, T. (2024). Is security still the chiefest enemy? The challenges and contradictions in European confidence- and security-building in the Cold War. Journal of Trust Research, Online First.
   Google Scholar
• Isaeva, N., Bachmann, R., Bristow, A., & Saunders, M. N. K. (2015). Why the epistemologies of trust research matter. Journal of Trust Research, 5(2), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2015.1074585
   Google Scholar
• Karhapää, S., & Savolainen, T. I. (2018). Trust and development processes in intra-organizational relationships: A multi-level permeation of trust in a merging university. Journal of Trust Research, 8(1), 166–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2018.1509009
   Google Scholar
• Kong, D. T., Lount, R. B., Jr., Olekalns, M., & Ferrin, D. L. (2017). Advancing scientific understanding of trust in the contexts of negotiations and repeated bargaining. Journal of Trust Research, 7(1), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2017.1289100
   Google Scholar
• Lalot and Greifenender (2024).
   Google Scholar
• Li, P. P. (2011). The rigour-relevance balance for engaged scholarship: New frame and new agenda for trust research and beyond. Journal of Trust Research, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2011.550718
   Google Scholar
• Li, P. P. (2012). When trust matters the most: The imperatives for contextualizing trust research. Journal of Trust Research, 2(2), 101–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2012.708494
   Google Scholar
• Lu, S. C., Kong, D. T., Ferrin, D. L., & Dirks, K. T. (2017). What are the determinants of interpersonal trust in dyadic negotiations? Meta-analytic evidence and implications of future research. Journal of Trust Research, 7(1), 22–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2017.1285241
   Google Scholar
• Mangold, F. (2023). Improving media trust research through better measurement: An item response theory perspective. Journal of Trust Research, Online First.
   Google Scholar
• Mathews, M. (2017). Gift giving, reciprocity, and the creation of trust. Journal of Trust Research, 7(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2017.1286597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEvily, B., & Tortoriello, M. (2011). Measuring trust in organizational research: Review and recommendations. Journal of Trust Research, 1(1), 23–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2011.552424
   Google Scholar
• Möllering, G. (2014). Trust, calculativeness, and relationships: A special issue 20 years after Williamson’s warning. Journal of Trust Research, 4(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2014.891316
   Google Scholar
• Möllering, G. (2017). Cultivating the field of trust research. Journal of Trust Research, 7(2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2017.1380912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möllering, G., & Hamm, J. A. (2023). Impact and the (Journal of) trust research. Journal of Trust Research, 13(2), 99–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patent, V., & Searle, R. H. (2019). Qualitative meta-analysis of propensity to trust measurement. Journal of Trust Research, 9(2), 136–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2019.1675074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PytlikZillig, L. M., Hamm, J. A., Shockley, E., Herian, M. N., Neal, T. M. S., Kimbrough, C. D., Tomkins, A. J., & Bornstein, B. H. (2016). The dimensionality of trust-relevant constructs in four institutional contexts: Results from confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Trust Research, 6(2), 111–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2016.1151359
   Google Scholar
• Schafheitle, S., Weibel, A., & Mollering, G. (2023). Inviting submissions to the special issue on trust and vulnerability (deadline 31 August 2024). Journal of Trust Research, 13(2), 252–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2023.2246837
   Google Scholar
• Schilke, O., Powell, A., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2023). A review of experimental research on organizational trust. Journal of Trust Research, 13(2), 102–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2023.2214202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (2016). Empowerment in veterinary clinics: The role of trust in delegation. Journal of Trust Research, 6(1), 76–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2016.1153479
   Google Scholar
• Shepisi, M., Gjoneska, B., Mari, S., Panasiti, M. S., Porciello, G., & Imhoff, R. (2023). Conspiracy mentality differentially shapes interpersonal trust when money or digital privacy is at stake. Journal of Trust Research, Online First.
   Google Scholar
• Six, F. E., & Latusek, D. (2023). Distrust: A critical review exploring a universal distrust sequence. Journal of Trust Research, 13(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2023.2184376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallentin, S., & Thygesen, N. (2017). Trust and control in public sector reform: Complementarity and beyond. Journal of Trust Research, 7(2), 150–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2017.1354766
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, E., Makagonova, V., de Kwaadsteniet, E. W., & Schutter, M. (2017). Deterrence-based trust in bargaining: Introducing a new experimental paradigm. Journal of Trust Research, 7(1), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2016.1254093
   Google Scholar
• Weinschenk, A. C., & Dawes, C. T. (2019). The genetic and psychological underpinnings of generalized social trust. Journal of Trust Research, 9(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2018.1497516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yogev, D. (2024). Police legitimacy in the making: The underlying social forces for police legitimacy among religious communities. Journal of Trust Research, Online First.
   Google Scholar
• Young, S. G., & McGrath, R. E. (2020). Character strengths as predictors of trust and cooperation in economic decision-making. Journal of Trust Research, 10(2), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2021.1922911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar