A Courtly Dance: Reflexivity and Reputational Sensitivity in Research with Well-Established Non-Profit Organisations

References

• Alcoff, L. M. 2002. “Does the Public Intellectual Have Intellectual Integrity?” Metaphilosophy 33 (5): 521–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazeley, P. 2013. Qualitative Data Analysis: Practical Strategies. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Behar, R. 1993. Translated Woman: Crossing the Border with Esperanza’s Story. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blee, K. M., and V. Taylor. 2002. “Semi-structured Interviewing in Social Movement Research.” In Methods of Social Movement Research, edited by B. Klandermans, and S. Staggenborg, 92–117. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boggiano, V. L., L. M. Harris, and D. T. Nguyen. 2015. “Building Connections While Conducting Qualitative Health Research Fieldwork in Vietnam: Two Case Studies.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 14 (4): 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein, D. 2004. How to Change the World: Social Entrepreneurs and the Power of New Ideas. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, L. M., N. J. Gray, Z. A. Meletis, J. G. Abbott, and J. J. Silver. 2006. “Gatekeepers and Keymasters: Dynamic Relationships of Access in Geographical Fieldwork.” The Geographical Review 96 (1): 97–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2013. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Crowhurst, I. 2013. “The Fallacy of the Instrumental Gate? Contextualising the Process of Gaining Access Through Gatekeepers.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 16 (6): 463–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crutchfield, L. R., and H. McLeod Grant. 2008. Forces for Good: The Six Practices of High-Impact Non-Profits. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Doucet, A. 2008. “‘from her Side of the Gossamer Wall(s)’: Reflexivity and Relational Knowing.” Qualitative Sociology 31: 73–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagle, G., G. Hayes, and T. Sibanda. 2006. “Standpoint Methodologies: Marxist, Feminist, and Black Scholarship Perspectives.” In Research in Practice: Applied Methods for the Social Sciences, edited by M. Terre Blanche, K. Durrheim, and D. Painter, 499–522. Cape Town: UCT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, A. J., M. MacPhee, and G. Dickson. 2015. “Doing Participatory Action Research in a Multicase Study: A Methodological Example.” In International Journal of Qualitative Methods 1–9. Accessed October 27: 2018. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406915621405.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1986. “Of Other Spaces.” Diacritics 16 (1): 22–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry, P. H. 2014. “Ways In and Out of the Hermeneutic Circle.” Yale University: Open Yale Courses License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA. Accessed June 04, 2014. http://oyc.yale.edu/english/engl-300/lecture-3.
   Google Scholar
• Giordano, J., M. O’Reilly, H. Taylor, and N. Dogra. 2007. “Confidentiality and Autonomy: The Challenge(s) of Offering Research Participants a Choice of Disclosing Their Identity.” Qualitative Health Research 17 (2): 264–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Relay For Life – American Cancer Society. 2022. “Global Relay for Life”. Accessed on March 12, 2022. https://www.cancer.org/involved/fundraise/relay-for-life/international.html.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, E., I. Hardill, and J. Ramsey. 2014. “Co-producing Knowledge: Reflections on the Benefits and Challenges of Researching in Partnership with Voluntary Sector Organisations.” Voluntary Sector Review 5 (3): 399–406.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, R. 2001. Towards Financial Self-Reliance: A Handbook on Resource Mobilization for Civil Society Organizations in the South. London: Earthscan Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Jansson, S. M., C. Benoit, L. Casey, R. Phillips, and D. Burns. 2010. “In for the Long Haul: Knowledge Translation Between Academic and Nonprofit Organizations.” Qualitative Health Research 20 (1): 131–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jäger, U. P., and A. Schröer. 2014. “Integrated Organizational Identity: A Definition of Hybrid Organizations and a Research Agenda.” Voluntas 25 (5): 1281–1306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, P. 2006. “Unravelling Foucault’s ‘Different Spaces’.” History of the Human Sciences 19 (4): 75–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleidman, R. 2009. “Engaged Social Movement Scholarship.” In Handbook of Public Sociology, edited by V. Jeffries, 341–356. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lahman, M. K. E., K. L. Rodriguez, L. Moses, K. M. Griffin, B. M. Mendoza, and W. Yacoub. 2015. “A Rose by Any Other Name is Still a Rose? Problematizing Pseudonyms in Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 21 (5): 445–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawler, E. J. 2003. “Interaction, Emotion, and Collective Identities.” In Advances in Identity Theory and Research, edited by P. J. Burke, T. J. Owens, R. T. Serpe, and P. A. Thoits, 135–149. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. 2003. “Design Issues.” In Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers, edited by J. Richie, and J. Lewis, 47–76. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., S. A. Lynham, and E. G. Guba. 2011. “Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences, Revisited.” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin, and Y. S. Lincoln, 97–128. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, C. B., and I. B. Neumann. 2015. “Uses of the Self: Two Ways of Thinking About Scholarly Situatedness and Method.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 43 (3): 798–819.
   Google Scholar
• Olivier, C., M. R. Hunt, and V. Ridde. 2016. “NGO-Researcher Partnerships in Global Health Research: Benefits, Challenges, and Approaches That Promote Success.” Development in Practice 26 (4): 444–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 2015. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Polletta, F., and J. M. Jasper. 2001. “Collective Identity and Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 27: 283–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinsloo, E. L. 2015. “From Victims to Warriors: Collective Identity Generation at Cancer Assemblies in South Africa.” PhD dissertation, University of Cape Town. Available http://open.uct.ac.za/handle/11427/16684.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A. 2001. “Collective Identity and Expressive Forms.” Center for the Study of Democracy, University of California. Accessed January 06, 2012. https://scholarship.org/uc/item/2zn1t7bj.
   Google Scholar
• Soja, E. W. 1996. Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Thesen, L. 2013. “Risk in Postgraduate Writing: Voice, Discourse and Edgework.” Cristal: Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning 1 (1): 103–122.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J., P. Bissell, C. L. Cooper, C. J. Armitage, and R. Barber. 2014. “Exploring the Impact of Patient and Public Involvement in a Cancer Research Setting.” Qualitative Health Research 24 (1): 46–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. 2010. “Qualitative Quality: Eight “BigTent” Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 16 (10): 837–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernis, A., M. Iglesias, B. Sanz, and A. Saz-Carranza. 2006. Non-Profit Organisations: Challenges and Collaborations. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Weisbrod, B. A. 1998. “The Non-Profit Mission and its Financing: Growing Links Between Non-Profits and the Rest of the Economy.” In To Profit or Not to Profit: The Commercial Transformation of the Non-Profit Sector, edited by B. A. Weisbrod, 1–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar