Influencing Preservice Teachers’ Intention to Adopt Web 2.0 Services

References

• Adams, D.A., Nelson, R.R., & Todd, P.A. (1992). Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quarterly, 16(2), 227–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajjan, A., & Hartshorne, R., (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 71–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. W., Fornell, C., & Lehman, D. R. (1994). Customer satisfaction, market share and profitability: Findings from Sweden. Journal of Marketing, 58, 53–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, T. (2004). Toward a theory of online learning. In T. Anderson & F. Elloumi (Eds.), Theory and practice of online learning (pp. 33–60). Athabasca, Alberta, Canada: Athabasca University.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. J. (2000). Findings from the teaching, learning and computing survey: Is Larry Cuban right? Report from a national study. Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations. Retrieved March 10, 2010, from http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/findings/ccsso.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. J. (2001, April). How are teachers using computers in instruction? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, T. (2006). Social software in academia. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 29(2), 61–64.
   Google Scholar
• Churchill, D. (2009). Educational applications of Web 2.0: Using blogs to support teaching and learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 179–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuban, L., (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dexter, S., & Riedel, E. (2003). Why improving preservice teacher educational technology preparation must go beyond the college’s walls. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(5), 334–346.
   Google Scholar
• Doering, A., Hughes, J., & Huffman, D. (2003). Preservice teachers: Are we thinking with technology? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(3), 342–361.
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4) 25–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M. (1963). An investigation of relationships between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward that object. Human Relations, 16, 233–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, T., & van Harmelen, M. (2007). Web 2.0 for content for learning and teaching in higher education. Retrieved April 23, 2009, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/digitalrepositories/web2-content-learning-and-teaching.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Grant, M. M., & Mims, C. (2009). Web 2.0 in teacher education: Characteristics, implications and limitations. In T. Kidd and I. Chen (Eds.), Wired for learning: An educators guide to Web 2.0 (pp. 343–360). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, T., Hannay, T., Lund, B., & Scott, J. (2005) Social bookmarking tools (I): A general review. D-Lib Magazine, 11(4). Retrieved July 23, 2010, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april05/hammond/04hammond.html
   Google Scholar
• Hargrave, C. P., & Hsu, Y. S. (2000). Survey of instructional technology courses for preservice teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(4), 303–314.
   Google Scholar
• Havenstein, H. (2008). Companies are looking for new ways to measure Web 2.0. Computerworld, 42(45), 14–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1499–1509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2008). National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Teachers. Eugene, OR. Retrieved August, 20, 2009, from http://www.iste.org/standards/nets-for-teachers.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Klassen, A. (2008). Can social networks predict what you’ll buy? Advertising Age, 79(43), 3–4.
   Google Scholar
• McRobbie, C., Ginns, I., & Stein, S. (2000). Preservice primary teachers’ thinking about technology and technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10(1), 81–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, L. B. (2007). The next wave now: Web 2.0. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 73(4), 4–5.
   Google Scholar
• Mumtaz, S. (2000). Factors affecting teachers’ use of information and communications technology: A review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9(3), 319–341.
   Google Scholar
• Nadkarni, S., & Gupta, R. (2007). A task-based model of perceived website complexity. MIS Quarterly, 31(3), 501–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niederhauser, D. S., & Stoddart, T. (2001). Teachers’ instructional perspectives and use of educational software. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(1), 15–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilley, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved June 29, 2009, from http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html
   Google Scholar
• Pedretti, E., Smith-Mayer, J., & Woodrow, J. (1999). Teaming technology enhanced instruction in the science classroom and teacher professional development. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 7, 131–143.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, M. E., & Cozart, A. (2004). Case studies of future teachers: Learning to teach with technology. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 21(2), 59–63.
   Google Scholar
• Pope, M., Hare, D., & Howard, E. (2002). Technology integration: Closing the gap between what preservice teachers are taught to do and what they can do. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(2), 191–203.
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2001, October). Digital natives, digital immigrants. Retrieved April 23, 2009, from http://www.marcprensky.com/writing
   Google Scholar
• Ravitz, J., Wong, Y., & Becker, H. (1999). Report to participants. Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations. Retrieved August 20, 2009, from http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/findings/special_report/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Rollett, H., Lux, M., Strohmaier, M., Dösinger, G., & Tochtermann, K. (2007) The Web 2.0 way of learning with technologies. International Journal of Learning Technology, 3(1), 87–107.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, M., Bebell, D., O’Dwyer, L., & O’Connor, K. (2003). Examining teacher technology use: Implications for preservice and inservice teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 297–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segars, A. (1997). Assessing the unidimensionality of measurement: a paradigm and illustration within the context of information systems research. Omega, 25(1) 107–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segars, A. H., & Grover, V. (1993). Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: A confirmatory factor analysis. MIS Quarterly, 17, 517–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2008). An investigation of differences in undergraduates’ academic use of the Internet. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(11), 11–22.
   Google Scholar
• Shiue, Y. (2007). Investigating the sources of teachers’ instructional technology use through the decomposed theory of planned behavior. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36(4), 425–453.
   Google Scholar
• Smerdon, B., Cronen, S., Lanahan, L., Anderson, J., Iannotti, N., & Angeles, J. (2000). Teachers’ tools for the 21^st century: A report on teachers’ use of technology (NCES 2000-102).
   Google Scholar
• Song, J., & Zahedi, F. M. (2005). A theoretical approach to Web design in e-commerce: A belief reinforcement model. Management Science, 51(8), 1219–1235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., & Todd, P.A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thackery, R., Neiger, B. L., Hanson, C. L., & McKenzie, J. F. (2008). Enhancing promotional strategies within social marketing programs: Use of Web 2.0 social media. Health Promotion Practice, 9(4), 338–343.
   Google Scholar
• van Braak, J., Tondeur, J., & Valcke, M. (2004). Explaining different types of computer use among primary school teachers. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19(4), 407–422.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., Maruping, L. M., & Bala, H. (2008). Predicting different conceptualizations of system use: The competing roles of behavioral intention, facilitating conditions, and behavioral expectation. MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 483–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003).User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Ertmer, P., & Newby, T. (2004). Increasing preservice teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 231–244.
   Google Scholar
• Warshaw, P. R., & Davis, F. D. (1984). Self-understanding and the accuracy of behavioral expectation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10(1), 111–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warshaw, P. R., & Davis, F. D. (1985). Disentangling behavioral intention and behavioral expectation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21(3), 213–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whetstone, L., & Carr-Chellman, A. A. (2001). Preparing preservice teachers to use technology: Survey results. Tech Trends, 46(4), 11–17.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J., & Chinn, S. J. (2009). Using Web 2.0 to support the active learning experience. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 165–174.
   Google Scholar
• Wixom, B. H., & Todd, P.A. (2005). A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 85–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildirim, S. (2000). Effects of an educational computing course on preservice and inservice teachers: A discussion and analysis of attitudes and use. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(4), 479–495.
   Google Scholar