Promoting Community for Online Learners in Special Education

References

• Alexander, M., Lignugaris/Kraft, B., & Forbush, D. (2007). Online mathematics methods course evaluation: Student outcomes, generalization, and pupil performance. Teacher Education and Special Education, 30, 199–216.
   Google Scholar
• Anagnostopoulos, D., Abasnadjian, K. G., & McCrory, R. S. (2005). The decentered teacher and the construction of social space in the virtual classroom. Teachers College Record, 107, 1699–1729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bain, K. (2009). Understanding great teachers: Analysis. Peer Review, 11(2), 9–13.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, K., & Hoy, C. (2006). Paying attention to adult learners online: The pedagogy and politics of community. Computers & Composition, 23, 32–48.
   Google Scholar
• Bran, E., & Correia, A. P. (2009). Facilitation strategies in online discussions: When the students take the lead. Distance Education, 30(3), 339–361.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999) How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, W. J., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutman, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers
   Google Scholar
• Croninger, R. G., & Valli, L. (2009). Mixing it up about methods. Educational Researcher, 38(7), 541–545.
   Google Scholar
• Dabbagh, N., & Bannan-Ritland, B. (2005). Online learning: Concepts, strategies, and application. Pearson/Merrill, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
   Google Scholar
• Fenstermacher, G., & Richardson, V. (2005). On making determinations of quality in teaching. Teachers College Record, 107, 186–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, J., & Tryjankowski, A. (2009). Online versus face-to-face learning: Looking at modes of instruction in master’s-level courses. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 33(3), 19–228. doi: 10.1080/03098770903026149
   Google Scholar
• Florida Department of Education. (2010). Access points. Retrieved June 10, 2010, from http://etc.usf.edu/flstandards/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Keating, T., Yovanoff, P., & Harniss, M. K. (2001). Working in special education: Factors that enhance special educators’ intent to stay. Exceptional Children, 67, 549–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlen, W., & Doubler, S. (2004). Can teachers learn through enquiry online? Studying professional development in science delivered online and on-campus. International Journal of Science Education, 26(10), 1247–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassenburg, A. (2009). Distance education versus the traditional classroom. Berkeley Scientific Journal, 13(1). Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/3859m52h
   Google Scholar
• Hiltz, S. R., & Goldman, R. (Eds.) (2005). Learning together online: Research on asynchronous learning networks. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, T., Day, S. L., & Russo, A. (2002). The virtual conference room: Online problem solving for first-year special educators. Teacher Education and Special Education, 25(4), 352–361.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, R., Moir, E., Swanson, E., & Wheeler, G. (2006). E-mentoring for student success: Online mentoring and professional development for new science teachers. In C. Dede (Ed.), Online professional development for teachers: Emerging models and methods, 89–116. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knapczyk, D., Chapman, C., Rodes, P., & Chung, H. (2001). Teacher preparation in rural communities through distance education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 24(4), 402–407.
   Google Scholar
• Knapczyk, D. R., Frey, T. J., & Wall-Marencik, W. (2005). An evaluation of web conferencing in online teacher education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 29, 114–124.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Legitimate peripheral participation in communities of practice. situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Littleton, K, & Whitelock, D. (2005). The negotiation and co-construction of meaning and understanding within a postgraduate online learning community. Learning, Media and Technology, 30(2), 147–164.
   Google Scholar
• Ludlow, B. L. (2003). An international outreach model for preparing early interventionists and early childhood special educators. Infants & Young Children, 16, 238–248.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, C. J., & Thompson, T. L. (2005). Structure, content, delivery, service, and outcomes: Quality e-learning in higher education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 6(2), np. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/237/852
   Google Scholar
• McKinney, J. P., McKinney, K. G., Franiuk, R., & Schweitzer, J. (2006). The college classroom as a community: Impact on student attitudes and learning. College Teaching, 54(3), 281–284.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neal, K., Jones, W. P., Miller, S. P., Campbell, P., & Peirce, T. (2007). Comparing Web-based to traditional instruction for teaching special education content. Teacher Education and Special Education, 30(1), 34–41.
   Google Scholar
• Palloff, R., & Pratt, K. (2005). Collaborating online: Learning together in community. San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, B., Dalton, J., & Edwards, M. (2009). Photographic images as an interactive online teaching technology: Creating online communities. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(2), 106–115.
   Google Scholar
• Puntambekar, S. (2006). Analyzing collaborative interactions: Divergence, shared understanding and construction of knowledge. Computers and Education, 47(3), 332–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riel, M., & Polin, L. (2004). Online communities: Common ground and critical differences in designing technical environments. In S. A. Barab, R. Kling, and J. H. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning, 16–50. Cambridge, MA.: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rovai, A. P. (2002). Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(4), 319–332.
   Google Scholar
• Sarason, S., Davidson, K. S., & Blatt, B. (1986). The Preparation of teachers: An unstudied problem in education. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schwen, T. M., & Hara. N. ( 2004). Community of practice: A metaphor for online design. In S. A. Barab, R. Kling, and J. H. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning, 154–78. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, J. D., Duffy, M. K., & Stark, E. M. (2000). Interdependence and preference for group work: Main and congruence effects on the satisfaction and performance of group members. Journal of Management, 26(2), 259–279.
   Google Scholar
• Sindelar, P. T., Brownell, M. T., & Billingsley, B. (2010). Special education teacher education research: Current status and future directions. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33, 8–24.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. (2001). The positive and challenging aspects of learning online and in traditional face-to-face classrooms: A student perspective. Journal of Special Education Technology, 16(1), 52–59.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. J., & Meyen, E. L. (2003). Applications of online instruction: An overview for teachers, students with mild disabilities, and their parents. Focus on Exceptional Children, 35(6), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Spooner, F., Agran, M., Spooner, M., & Kiefer-O’Donnell, R., (2000). Preparing personnel with expertise in severe disabilities in the electronic age: Innovative programs and technologies. The Journal for the Association for Persons with Severe Handicap, 25, 92–103.
   Google Scholar
• Thrope, M. (1998). Assessment and third-generation distance education. Distance Education, 19(2), 265–286.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Vrasidas, C., & Glass, G. V. 2004. Teacher professional development: Issues and trends. In C. Vrasidas and G. V. Glass (Eds.), Online professional development for teachers, 1–12. Greenwich, CT.: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• West, E., & Jones, P. (2007). A framework for planning in technology: Considerations for low-incidence teacher preparation programs that serve rural communities. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 26(4), 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., Lei, J., Yan, B., Lai, C., & Tan, Y. S. (2005). What makes the difference? Practical analysis of research on the effectiveness of distance education. [Meta-analysis]. Teachers College Record, 107, 1836–1884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar