Secondary Science Teachers’ Use of Technology in the Classroom during Their First 5 Years

References

• American Association for the Advancement of Sciences (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Appeldoorn, K. (2004). Developing and validating the Collaboratives for Excellence in Teacher Preparation (CETP) core evaluation classroom observation protocol (COP). PhD dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
   Google Scholar
• Bang, E. (2013). Hybrid mentoring programs for beginning elementary science teachers. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(1), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Bass, J., Contant, T., & Carin, A. (2009). Teaching science as inquiry (11th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdan, R., & Bilden, R. C. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn-Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Britton, E., Paine, L., Pimm, D., & Raizen, S. (2003). Comprehensive teacher induction: System for early career learning. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Colombo, M. W., & Colombo, P. D. (2007). Using blogs to improve differentiated instruction. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 73(4), 10–14.
   Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Reforming schools through technology, 1980-2000. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, V. (2008). Use of information communication technology by early career science teachers in Western Australia. International Journal of Science Education, 30(2), 203–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haberman, M. (1991). The pedagogy of poverty versus good teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, December, 290–294.
   Google Scholar
• Hickey, D. T., Ingram-Goble, A. A., & Jameson, E. M. (2009). Designing assessments and assessing designs in virtual educational environments. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(2), 187–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotchkiss, R., & Dickerson, D. (2008). A remote-sensing mission. Science and Children, 45(5), 44–49.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, S. (2008). The relationship between computer use and academic achievements. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Available from UNT Digital Library. (OCLC: 326878169). Retrieved from http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc9084/m2/1/high_res_d/
   Google Scholar
• International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2006). Digital equity toolkit. Eugene, OR: ISTE Headquarters. Retrieved from http://carolinetechmentor.edublogs.org
   Google Scholar
• Isman, A., Yaratan, H., & Caner, H. (2007). How technology is integrated into science education in a developing country: North Cyprus case. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 6(3).
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrenz, F., Huffman, D., & Gravely, A. (2007). Impact of the collaboratives for excellence in teacher preparation program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(9), 1348–1369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrenz, F., Huffman, D., Appeldoorn, K., & Sun, T. (2002). CETP core evaluation, classroom observation handbook. Minneapolis, MN: CAREI.
   Google Scholar
• Luft, J. A., Firestone, J. B., Wong, S. S., Ortega, I., Adams, K., & Bang, E. (2011). Beginning Secondary Science Teacher Induction: A Two-Year Mixed Methods Study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1199–1224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (2004). Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison approach. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morales., T.; Bang, E., & Andre, T (2012). A one-year case study: Understanding the rich potential of project-based learning in a virtual reality class for high school students. Journal of Science Education and Technology. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10956-012-9431-7
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council, National Science Teachers Association, American Association for the Advancement of Science, & American Association for the Advancement of Science (n.d.). Next generation science standards for states, by states. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org
   Google Scholar
• Palloff, R., & Pratt, K. (2005). Collaborating online: Learning together in community. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Sandholtz, J. H., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D. C. (1997). Teaching with technology: Creating student-centered classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 402 923)
   Google Scholar
• Songer, N. B., Lee, H.-S., & Kam, R. (2002). Technology-rich inquiry science in urban classrooms: What are the barriers to inquiry pedagogy? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(2), 128–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen, P., Twidle, J., Childs, A., & Godwin, J. (2007). The use of the Internet in science teaching: A longitudinal study of developments in use by student-teachers in England. International Journal of Science Education, 29(13), 1605–1627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Valanides, N., & Angeli, C. (2008). Professional development for computer-enhanced learning: A case study with science teachers. Research in Science & Technological Education, 26(1), 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, J. (2006) Digital divide: Research, achievements, and shortcomings. Poetics, 34, 221–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varma, K., Husic, F., & Linn, M. C. (2008). Targeted support for using technology-enhanced science inquiry modules. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(4), 341–356.
   Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E., White, N., & Smith, J. (2009). Digital habitats: Stewarding technology for communities. Portland, OR: CPsquare.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M., Linn, M. C., Ammon, P., & Gearhart, M. (2004). Learning to teach inquiry science in a technology-based environment: A case study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(2), 189–206.
   Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M., & Sahl, K. (2002). Tracing teachers’ use of technology in a laptop computer school: The interplay of teacher beliefs, social dynamics, and institutional culture. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 165–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar