CSU Digital Ambassadors: An Empowering and Impactful Faculty Learning Community

References

• Allen, D. (2013). Reconstructing professional learning community as collective creation. Improving Schools, 16(3), 191–208.
   Google Scholar
• Bausmith, J. M., & Barry, C. (2011). Revisiting professional learning communities to increase college readiness: The importance of pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Researcher, 40(4), 175–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjorkman, C., & Olofsson, A. (2009). Qualitative descriptions of pre-conditions for capacity building in schools. International Studies in Educational Administration, 37(2), 25–40.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkerhoff, J. (2006). Effects of a long-duration, professional development academy on technology skills, computer self-efficacy, and technology integration beliefs and practices. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39, 22–43.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, C. F. (2010). Toward ‘hybridised’ faculty development for the twenty-first century: Blending online communities of practice and face-to-face meetings in instructional and professional development programs. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(3), 261–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• California State University Digital Ambassador Cases. (2012–2013). Innovative digital applications: The CSU Digital Ambassador Program. Office of the Chancellor: California State University. Retrieved from http://teachingcommons.cdl.edu/ngss/digital/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Cox, M. D. (2004). Introduction to faculty learning communities. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 97, 5–23. Retrieved from http://www.vcu.edu/cte/programs/FLC/IntroductionToFLCs.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: President and Fellows of Harvard College.
   Google Scholar
• Desrochers, C.G. (2010). Faculty learning communities as catalysts for implementing successful small-group learning. In J. Cooper & P. Robinson (Eds.). Small group learning in higher education: Research and practice. New Forums Press. Retrieved from http://www.calstatela.edu/academic/aa/cetl/resources/FLC.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3).
   Google Scholar
• Ghaye, T. (2010). Teaching and learning through reflective practice: A practical guide for positive action. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, C. (2007). Capacity building: Sustaining urban secondary schools as resilient self-renewing organizations in the face of standardized educational reform. Urban Review, 40(2), 137–163. doi:10.1007/s11256-007-0068-4
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, D., & Jackson, D. (2003). Building the capacity for leading and learning. In A. Harris, C. Day, M. Hadfield, D. Hopkins, A. Hargreaves, & C. Chapman (Eds.), Effective leadership for school improvement (pp. 84–105). London, UK: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• International Society for Technology in Education. (2010). The International Society for Technology in Education Standards for teachers. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/docs/pdfs/20-14_ISTE_Standards-T_PDF.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, T., Wisniewski, M. A., Kuhlemeyer, G., Isaacs, G., & Krzykowski, J. (2012). Technology adoption in higher education: Overcoming anxiety through faculty bootcamp. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(2), 63–72.
   Google Scholar
• Kanstrup, A. M. (2004). Talking about technology: An interview with Bonnie A. Nardi. Impact, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, E., Parker, E., Ross, D., & Soodjinda, D. (2013). Supporting technology integration in STEM teacher preparation: Case studies from across California State University campuses. Sacramento, CA: California State University, Teacher Education and Public School Programs. Retrieved from http://www.calstate.edu/teacherED/documents/CSU-Case-Studies-TechIntegration-STEM-TeacherEd.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McCoy, A. H. (2000). Building a vision for technology integration. In C. Crawford, D. Willis, R. Carlsen, I. Gibson, K. McFerrin, J. Price, & R. Weber (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2000 (pp. 451–456). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technology pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Kereluik, K. (2009). The song remains the same: Looking back to the future of educational technology. TechTrends, 53(5), 48–53.
   Google Scholar
• Nardi, B. A., & Engeström, Y. (1999). A web in the wind: The structure of invisible work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, S. J., & Thompson, G. W. (2005). Barriers perceived by administrators and faculty regarding the use of distance education technologies in preservice programs for secondary agricultural education teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 46(4), 36.
   Google Scholar
• Nugent, J., Reardon, R. M., Smith, F. G., Rhodes, J. A., Zander, M. J., & Carter, T. (2008). Exploring faculty learning communities: Building connections among teaching, learning, and technology. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(1), 51–58.
   Google Scholar
• Somekh, B. (2008). Factors affecting teachers’ pedagogical adoption of ICT. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 449–460). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, C. (2005, June). Technology in teacher education: Faculty visions and decision making. Paper presented at the National Educational Computing Conference, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmazel-Sahin, Y., & Oxford, R.L. (2010). A comparative analysis of teacher education faculty development models for technology integration. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(4), 693–720.
   Google Scholar