Exploring factors that influence teachers’ intentions to integrate digital literacy using the decomposed theory of planned behavior

References

• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, M. P. (1997). Understanding regression analysis. New York: NetLibrary, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Atsoglou, K., & Jimoyiannis, A. (2012). Teachers’ decisions to use ICT in classroom practice: An investigation based on decomposed theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence, 3(2), 20–37. doi:10.4018/jdldc.2012040102
   Google Scholar
• Aviram, R., & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2006). Towards a theory of digital literacy: Three scenarios for the next steps. European Journal of Open Distance ELearning, Retrieved April 10, 2018 from http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2006/Aharon_Aviram.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, N. M. (2009). “It makes it more real”: Teaching new literacies in a secondary english classroom. English Education, 41(3), 207–234.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjørgen, A. M., & Erstad, O. (2015). The connected child: Tracing digital literacy from school to leisure. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 10(2), 113–127. doi:10.1080/1554480X.2014.977290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blois, Z. (2013). The importance of teaching digital literacy to students. Retrieved Jan 2, 2018, from http://blog.wowzers.com/the-importance-of-teaching-digital-literacy-to-students/.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, T., Sainter, P., & Saunders, G. (2013). Factors affecting faculty use of learning technologies: Implications for models of technology adoption. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 25(1), 1–11. doi:10.1007/s12528-013-9066-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çam, E., & Kiyici, M. (2017). Perceptions of prospective teachers on digital literacy. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(4), 29–44.
   Google Scholar
• Choy, D., Wong, A., & Gao, P. (2009). Student teachers’ intentions and actions on integrating technology into their classrooms during student teaching: A Singapore study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 175–195. doi:10.1080/15391523.2009.10782546
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, D. (2011). Bringing the common core to life. Retrieved April 2, 2017, from http://usny.nysed.gov/rttt/resources/bringing-the-common-core-to-life.html.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111–1132. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284. doi:10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari, A. (2012). Digital competence in practice: An analysis of frameworks. JRC Technical Report. Luxembourg: European Union. Retrieved from http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC68116.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003). Assessing significance in a fourfold table. In Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions (3rd ed., pp. 50–63). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R., Atkins, L., & Fraser, J. (2014). Defining a self-evaluation digital literacy framework for secondary educators: The DigiLit Leicester project. Research in Learning Technology, 22(1), 21440. doi:10.3402/rlt.v22.21440
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, T., & Turner, K. H. (2013). No longer a luxury: Digital literacy can’t wait. English Journal, 102(6), 58–65.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, R., & Tuzel, S. (2017). Teacher motivations for digital and media literacy: An examination of Turkish educators. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(1), 7–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, F., Teo, T., & Zhou, M. (2019). Factors affecting Chinese English as a foreign language teachers’ technology acceptance: A qualitative study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(1), 83–105. doi:10.1177/0735633117746168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchison, A., & Reinking, D. (2011). Teachers’ perceptions of integrating information and communication technologies into literacy instruction: A national survey in the United States. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(4), 312–333. doi:10.1002/RRQ.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISTE. (2019). National Educational Technology Standards for students. Retrieved Jan 15, 2019, from. https://www.iste.org/standards/for-students.
   Google Scholar
• Klem, L. (1995). Path analysis. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575–614. doi:10.3102/0034654307309921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. (2014). Digital literacy education for the development of digital literacy. International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence, 5(3), 29–43. doi:10.4018/ijdldc.2014070103
   Google Scholar
• Lomax, R. G., & Schumacker, R. E. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, A. (2005). DigEuLit: A European framework for digital literacy: A progress report. Journal of eLiteracy, 2(2), 130–136.
   Google Scholar
• Mathew Myers, J., & Halpin, R. (2002). Teachers' attitudes and use of multimedia technology in the classroom: Constructivist-based professional development training for school districts. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 18(4), 133–140.
   Google Scholar
• Michaels, C. E., & Spector, P. E. (1982). Causes of employee turnover: A test of the Mobley, Griffeth, Hand, and Meglino model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(1), 53–59. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.67.1.53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammadyari, S., & Singh, H. (2015). Understanding the effect of e-learning on individual performance: The role of digital literacy. Computers & Education, 82, 11–25. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Glazewski, K. D., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2010). Teacher value beliefs associated with using technology: Addressing professional and student needs. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1321–1335. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petko, D. (2012). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and their use of digital media in classrooms: Sharpening the focus of the ‘will, skill, tool’ model and integrating teachers’ constructivist orientations. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1351–1359. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadaf, A., & Johnson, B. L. (2017). Teachers’ beliefs about integrating digital literacy into classroom practice: An investigation based on the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33(4), 129–137. doi:10.1080/21532974.2017.1347534
   Google Scholar
• Sadaf, A., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2012). Exploring pre-service teachers’ beliefs about using Web 2.0 technologies in K–12 classroom. Computers & Education, 59, 937–945. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadaf, A., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2016). An investigation of the factors that influence preservice teachers’ intentions and integration of Web 2.0 tools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(1), 37–64. doi:10.1007/s11423-015-9410-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smarkola, C. (2008). Efficacy of a planned behaviour model: Beliefs that contribute to computer usage intentions of student teachers and experienced teachers. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 1196–1215. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144–176. doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T. (2009). Modeling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 52(1), 302–312. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T. (2015). Comparing pre-service and in-service teachers' acceptance of technology: Assessment of measurement invariance and latent mean differences. Computers & Education, 83, 22–31. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T., Huang, F., & Hoi, C. K. W. (2018). Explicating the influences that explain intention to use technology among English teachers in China. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(4), 460–475. doi:10.1080/10494820.2017.1341940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T., Lee, C. B., & Chai, C. S. (2007). Understanding preservice teachers’ computer attitudes: Applying and extending the technology acceptance model. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(2), 128–−143. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00247.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Acker, F., Van Buuren, H., Kreijns, K., & Vermeulen, M. (2013). Why teachers use digital learning materials: The role of self-efficacy, subjective norm and attitude. Education and Information Technologies, 18(3), 495–514. doi:10.1007/s10639-011-9181-9
   Google Scholar
• Vanderlinde, R., van Braak, J., & Dexter, S. (2012). ICT policy planning in a context of curriculum reform: Disentanglement of ICT policy domains and artifacts. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1339–1350. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., & Davis, F. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. doi:10.2307/30036540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voogt, J., Erstad, O., Dede, C., & Mishra, P. (2013). Challenges to learning and schooling in the digital networked world of the 21st century. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(5), 403–413. doi:10.1111/jcal.12029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar