Digital practice spaces and clinical practice in teacher preparation: Current uses and future possibilities

References

• Aldrich, C. (2009). Virtual worlds, simulations, and games for education: A unifying view. Innovate. Journal of Online Education, 5(5).
   Google Scholar
• Alvermann, D. E., O’Brien, D. G., & Dillon, D. R. (1990). What teachers do when they say they’re having discussions of content area reading assignments: A qualitative analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 296–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (AACTE). (2018b). A pivot toward clinical practice, its lexicon, and the renewal of educator preparation: Summary brief. Washington, DC. https://aacte.org/professional-development-and-events/clinical-practice-commission-pres-conference
   Google Scholar
• Agee, J. (2000). What is Effective Literature Instruction? A study of experienced high school English teachers in differing grade- and ability-level classes. Journal of Literacy Research, 32(3), 303–348. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10862960009548084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bain, R. B., & Moje, E. B. (2012). Mapping the teacher education terrain for novices. Phi Delta Kappan, 93(5), 62–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209300514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldinger, E. E., & Campbell, M. P. (2019). Cases of learning to respond to errors through approximations of leading whole-class discussions. In 41st Annual Meeting of PME-NA (pp. 1066–1075).
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497–511. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109348479
   Google Scholar
• Barton, K. C., & Levstik, L. S. (2004). Teaching history for the common good. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bautista, N. U., & Boone, W. J. (2015). Exploring the impact of TeachME lab virtual classroom teaching simulation on early childhood education majors’ self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(3), 237–262. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9418-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, T. A. (2005). Tools of deliberation: Exploring the complexity of learning to lead elementary civics discussions. Theory & Research in Social Education, 33(1), 103–119.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, T. A. (2013). Identity, discourse, and safety in a high schooldiscussion of same-sex marriage. Theory & Research in Social Education, 41(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2013.757759
   Google Scholar
• Bickmore, K., & Parker, C. (2014). Constructive conflict talk in classrooms: Divergent approaches to addressing divergent perspectives. Theory & Research in Social Education, 42, 291–335.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. [Database] https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032
   Google Scholar
• Calabrese Barton, A., Tan, E., Birmingham, D. J. (2020). Rethinking high-leverage practices in justice-oriented ways. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(4), 477–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, M. P., & Elliott, R. (2015). Designing approximations of practice and conceptualising responsive and practice-focused secondary mathematics teacher education. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 17(2), 146–164.
   Google Scholar
• Chilcoat, G. W. & Ligon, J. A. (2001). Discussion as a means for transformative change: Social studies lessons from the Mississippi Freedom Schools. The Social Studies, September/October, 213–219.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, C., & Lampert, M. (1986). The study of teacher thinking: Implications for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 37(5), 27–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718603700506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2014). Strengthening clinical preparation: The holy grail of teacher education. Peabody Journal of Education, 89(4), 547–561. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2014.939009
   Google Scholar
• Day, S. P., & Bryce, T. G. (2011). Does the discussion of socio‐scientific issues require a paradigm shift in science teachers’ thinking? International Journal of Science Education, 33(12), 1675–1702. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.519804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeGraff, T. K., Schmidt, C. M., Waddell, J. H. (2015). Field-based teacher education in literacy: Preparing teachers in real classroom contexts. Teaching Education, 26, 366–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dossin, M. M. (2002). Why won’t they talk? College Teaching, 50(1), 3.
   Google Scholar
• Dotger, B., & Ashby, C. (2010). Exposing conditional inclusive ideologies through simulated interactions. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 33(2), 114–130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406409357541
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 399–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A. (2002). Attaining excellence through deliberate practice: Insights from the study of expert performance. In M., Ferrari. (Ed.), The pursuit of excellence in education (pp. 21–55.
   Google Scholar
• Erlbaum. Ericsson, K. A., & Ashby, C. (2014). Why expert performance is special and cannot be extrapolated from studies of performance in the general population: A response to criticisms. Intelligence, 45, 81–103.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, A. T. (2017). Reforming only half: A study of practice-based teacher education in traditional field placements. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 29(3), 235–260.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, E. & Gee, J. P. (2017). Games as distributed teaching and learning systems. Teachers College Record, 119(12), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenewald, T. (2008). Memos and memoing. In: L. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 506–507). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, P. L., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross- professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055–2100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, P. L., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teaching, re-imaging teacher education. Teachers and Teaching, 15(2), 273–289. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600902875340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In H. Stevenson, H. Azuma, & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Child development and education in Japan (pp. 262–272). Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D. E. (2009). Controversy in the classroom: The democratic power of discussion. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D. E., & McAvoy, P. (2014). The political classroom: Evidence and ethics in democratic education (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315738871
   Google Scholar
• Howell, H., & Mikeska, J. N. (2021). Approximations of practice as a framework for understanding authenticity in simulations of teaching. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 53(1), 8–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1809033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, P. D. (2007). Lesson planning and the student teacher: Rethinking the dominant model. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(4), 483–498. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270500363620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Journell, W. (2016). Making a case for teacher political disclosure. Journal of curriculum theorizing, 31(1).
   Google Scholar
• Kaka, S. J., Littenberg-Tobias, J., Kessner, T., Francis, A. T., Kennett, K., Marvez, G., & Reich, J. (2021). Digital simulations as approximations of practice: Preparing preservice teachers to facilitate whole-class discussions of controversial issues. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 29(1), 67–90.
   Google Scholar
• Kavanagh, S. S., & Danielson, K. A. (2020). Practicing Justice, Justifying Practice: Toward Critical Practice Teacher Education. American Educational Research Journal, 57(1), 69–105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219848691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanagh, S. S., Metz, M., Hauser, M., Fogo, B., Taylor, M. W., & Carlson, J. (2020). Practicing responsiveness: Using approximations of teaching to develop teachers’ responsiveness to students’ ideas. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(1), 94–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampert, M., Franke, M., Kazemi, E., Ghousseini, H., Turrou, A., Beasley, H., & Crowe, K. (2013). Keeping it complex: Using rehearsals to support novice teacher learning of ambitious teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(3), 226–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, B. E. (1997). Social studies teachers’ conceptions of discussion: A grounded theory study, Theory & Research in Social Education, 25(2), 113–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.1997.10505798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren, R., Tscholl, M., Wang, S., Johnson, E. (2016). Enhancing learning and engagement through embodied interaction within a mixed reality simulation. Computers & Education, 95, 174–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marvez, G. R., Kessner, T. M., Littenberg-Tobias, J., & Reich, J. (2021, July). Virtual branching practice spaces to prepare educators for political discourse in the classroom. Tech Demo presented at the Connected Learning Summit (Virtual).
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• McAvoy, P., & Hess, D. (2013). Classroom deliberation in an era of political polarization. Curriculum Inquiry, 43(1), 14–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misco, T., & Patterson, N. C. (2007). A study of pre-service teachers’ conceptualizations of academic freedoms and controversial issues. Theory and Research in Social Education, 35, 520–550.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2019). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mislevy, R. J. (2013). Evidence-centered design for simulation-based assessment. Military Medicine, 178(10S), 101–114.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. K., Wilkinson, I. A., Soter, A. O., Hennessey, M. N., & Alexander, J. F. (2009). Examining the effects of classroom discussion on students’ comprehension of text: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 740–764. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, M. C. (2002). “Can any fraction be turned into a decimal?” A case study of a mathematical group discussion. In Learning discourse, (pp. 143–185). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, W. C. (2006). Talk isn’t cheap: Practicing deliberation in school. Social Studies and the Young Learner, 19(1), 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• Pace, J. L. (2019). Contained risk-taking: Preparing preservice teachers to teach controversial issues in three countries. Theory & Research in Social Education, 47(2), 228–260. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2019.1595240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quezada, R. L., Talbot, C., & Quezada-Parker, K. B. (2020). From bricks and mortar to remote teaching: A teacher education program’s response to COVID-19. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 472–483. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1801330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravitch, S. M., & Carl, N. M. (2016). Validity: Process, strategies, and considerations. In S. M. Ravitch & N. M. Carl (Eds.), Qualitative research: Bridging the conceptual, theoretical, and methodological (pp. 185–214). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, J., Kim, Y. J., Robinson, K., Roy, D., & Thompson, M. (2018, July). Teacher practice spaces: Examples and design considerations [Paper Presentation]. 13th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Inc, London, United Kingdom. https://research.utwente.nl/files/102267789/ICLS2018_Volume_1_Final.pdf#page=688
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, L. B. (1987). The 1987 presidential address learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 16(9), 13–54.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, J., Franke, M., Yun, J.-E. E., Ishimoto, M., Diera, C., Geller, R. C., Berryman, A., & Brenes, T. (2017, October). Teaching and learning in the age of Trump: Increasing stress and hostility in America’s high schools. UCLA Institute for Ideas, Democracy, Education, and Access. https://idea.gseis.ucla.edu/publications/teaching-and-learning-in-age-of-trump
   Google Scholar
• Samuelsson, M. (2016). Education for deliberative democracy: A typology of classroom discussions, Democracy and Education, 24(1).
   Google Scholar
• Sprague, D. R., Parsons, S. A., & Parker, A. K. (2020). Technology infusion in clinical experiences. In A.C. Borthwick, T.S. Foulger, & K.J. Graziano (Eds.), Championing technology infusion in teacher preparation: A framework for supporting future educators (pp. 131–148). International Society for Technology in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M., Owho-Ovuakporie, K., Robinson, K., Kim, Y. J., Slama, R., & Reich, J. & (2019). Teacher moments: A digital simulation for preservice teachers to approximate parent–teacher conversations. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35(3), 144–164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1587727
   Google Scholar
• Van Zoest, L. R., & Stockero, S. L. (2008). Synergistic scaffolds as a means to support preservice teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(8), 2038–2048. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetzel, A. P., De Arment, S. T., & Reed, E. (2015). Building teacher candidates’ adaptive expertise: engaging experienced teachers in prompting reflection. Reflective Practice, 16(4), 546–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, C., Wendell, K. B., & Paugh, P. P. (2018). “Just put it together to make no commotion:” Re-imagining urban elementary students’ participation in engineering design practices. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 6(3), 285–301. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.428192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yendol-Hoppey, D., & Hoppey, D. (2018). Outcomes of high-clinical practice in teacher education. Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, NC.
   Google Scholar