Link to session: Turning literacy tutoring into virtual tutoring

References

• Ajayi, L. (2010). Preservice teachers’ knowledge, attitudes, and perception of their preparation to teach multiliteracies/multimodaility. The Teacher Educator, 46(1), 6–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2010.488279
   Google Scholar
• Alegre, F., Moliner, L., Maroto, A., & Lorenzo-Valentin, G. (2019). Peer tutoring in algebra: A study in middle school. The Journal of Educational Research, 112(6), 693–699. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2019.1693947
   Google Scholar
• Alvermann, D. E. (2008). Commentary: Why bother theorizing adolescents’ online literacies for classroom practice and research? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(1), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.52.1.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arco-Tirado, J., Fernández-Martín, F., & Hervás-Torres, M. (2020). Evidence-based peer-tutoring program to improve students’ performance at the university. Studies in Higher Education, 45(11), 2122–2090. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1597038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basilaia, G., & Kvavadze, D. (2020). Transition to online education in schools during a SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in Georgia. Pedagogical Research, 5(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/7937
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, C., & Merchant, G. (2015). The challenge of 21st- Century Literacies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 59(3), 271–274. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh, C., Gillian, K. J., Kromrey, J., Hess, M., & Blomeyer, R. (2004). The effects of distance education on K-12 student outcomes: A meta-analysis. Learning Point Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, B., Slavin, R. E., Madden, N. A., Abrami, P. C., Logan, M., & Gifford, R. (2011). Small-group computer-assisted tutoring to improve reading outcomes for struggling first and second graders. The Elementary School Journal, 111(4), 625–640. https://doi.org/10.1086/659035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherner, T., & Smith, D. (2017). Reconceptualizing TPACK to meet the needs of twenty-first century education. The New Educator, 13(4), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/1547688X.2015.1063744
   Google Scholar
• Christ, T., Arya, P., & Liu, Y. (2019). Technology integration in literacy lessons: Challenges and successes. Literacy Research and Instruction, 58(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2018.1554732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009). Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(3), 164–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800903076044
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J., & Poth, C. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Erlandson, D., Harris, E., Skipper, B., & Allen, S. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, N. (2011). Qualitative research methods in psychology. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2009). Reflections on reading Cope and Kalantzis’ “multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(3), 196–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800903076077
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt, D. (2001). But there’s nothing good to read. Media Spectrum: Michigan Association for Media in Education, 4, 34–37.
   Google Scholar
• Hrastinski, S., & Stenbom, S. (2013). Student-student online coaching: Conceptualizing an emerging learning activity. The Internet and Higher Education, 16, 66–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hrastinski, S., Stenbom, S., Benjaminsson, S., & Jansson, M. (2021). Identifying and exploring the effects of different types of tutor questions in individual online synchronous tutoring in mathematics. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(3), 510–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1583674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalantzis, M., Cope, B., & Cloonan, A. (2010). A multiliteracies perspective on the new literacies. In E. Baker (Ed.) The new literacies: Multiple perspectives on research and practice. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ko, S., & Rossen, S. (2004). Teaching online: A practical guide. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, T., Hibbard, L., Franklin, T., & Moore, D. R. (2017). Preparing teacher candidates for virtual field placements via an exposure to K-12 online teaching. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 16, 001–014. https://doi.org/10.28945/3626
   Google Scholar
• Madden, N., & Slavin, R. (2017). Evaluations of technology-assisted small-group tutoring for struggling readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 33(4), 327–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2016.1255577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate? Educational Researcher, 17(2), 13–17. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1174583 https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X017002013
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, K. (2009). Multiliteracies: Interrogating competing discourses. Language and Education, 23(2), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780802152762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore-Hayes, C. (2011). Technology integration preparedness and its influence on teacher-efficacy. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La Revue Canadienne de L’apprentissage et de la Technologie, 37(3), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• New London Group (2000). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 9–38). Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies. The New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilson, L. B., & Goodson, L. A. (2017). Online teaching at its best: Merging instructional design with teaching and learning research. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, K., & Rowsell, J. (2012). Literacy and education: Understanding the new literacy studies in the classroom. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S., & Kim, C. (2015). Boosting learning-by-teaching in virtual tutoring. Computers & Education, 82, 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pytash, K. E., & O’Byrne, W. I. (2014). Research on literacy instruction and learning in virtual, blended, and hybrid environments. In R. Ferdig & K. Kennedy (Eds.), Handbook of research on K-12 online and blended learning (pp. 179–200). ETC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rowsell, J., & Walsh, M. (2011). Rethinking literacy education in new times: Multimodality, multiliteracies, & new literacies. Brock Education, 21(1), 53–62.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E., Madden, N. A., Chambers, B., & Haxby, B. (2009). Two million children: Success for All. Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Toquero, C. M. (2020). Challenges and opportunities for higher education amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Philippine context. Pedagogical Research, 5(4), em0063. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/7947
   Google Scholar
• Trumble, J. (2016). Internships and TPACK: The impact of student teaching on novice teachers’ self-perceived TPACK. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 3086–3090). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
   Google Scholar
• Van Allsburg, C. (1981). Jumanji. Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Vasquez, E., & Slocum, T. (2012). Evaluation of synchronous online tutoring for students at risk of reading failure. Exceptional Children, 78(2), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291207800205
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, M. (2017). Multiliteracies, multimodality, new literacies and…what do these mean for literacy education? Inclusive Principles and Practices in Literacy Education, 11, 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-363620170000011002
   Google Scholar
• Wu, M., & Gao, Q. (2020). Using live video streaming in online tutoring: Exploring factors affecting social interactions. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(10), 964–977. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1706288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2014). Case study research. Sage.
   Google Scholar