“The conversation has more levels”: exploring Zoom’s text chat as a discussion mediator in middle school teachers’ online professional development

References

• Ajabshir, Z. F. (2019). The effect of synchronous and asynchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) on EFL learners’ pragmatic competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacalja, A. (2018). What critical literacy has to offer the study of video games. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 41(3), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03652016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae, C. L., Mills, D. C., Zhang, F., Sealy, M., Cabrera, L., & Sea, M. (2021). A systematic review of science discourse in K-12 urban classrooms in the United States: Accounting for individual, collective, and contextual factors. Review of Educational Research, 91(6), 831–877. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211042415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernal, D. D. (2001). Learning and living pedagogies of the home: The mestiza consciousness of Chicana students. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 14(5), 623–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390110059838
   Google Scholar
• Butz, N. T., & Stupnisky, R. H. (2017). Improving student relatedness through an online discussion intervention: The application of self-determination theory in synchronous hybrid program. Computers & Education, 114, 117–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carman, A. (2020). Why Zoom became so popular. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2020/4/3/21207053/zoom-video-conferencing-security-privacy-risk-popularity
   Google Scholar
• Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Chen, N. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2009). The use of online synchronous discussion for web-based professional development for teachers. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1155–1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cogdill, S., Fanderclai, T., Kilborn, J., & Williams, M. (2001). Backchannel: Whispering in digital conversation. Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Article 4033). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2001.926500
   Google Scholar
• Coiro, J. (2021). Toward a multifaceted heuristic of digital reading to inform assessment, research, practice, and policy. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(1), 9–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comber, B., Kamler, B., Hood, D., Moreau, S., & Painter, J. (2004). Thirty years into teaching: Professional development, exhaustion and rejuvenation. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 3(2), 74–87.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R. C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. National Staff Development Council. https://edpolicy.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/publications/professional-learning-learning-profession-status-report-teacher-development-us-and-abroad_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dede, C., Ketelhut, D., Whitehouse, P., Breit, L., & McCloskey, E. M. (2009). A research agenda for online teacher professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108327554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, L., & Garet, M. (2015). Best practices in teachers’ professional development in the United States. Psychology, Society, & Education, 7(3), 252–263. https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v7i3.515
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, H. (2018). Supporting student interaction through the use of digital backchannel discussions. In E. Langran, & J. Borup (Eds.), Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1421–1426). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/182714/
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, J. C. (2017). The evolution from traditional to online professional development: A review. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33(3), 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2017.1305304
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic field notes (2nd ed). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faigley, L. (1992). Fragments of rationality: Postmodernity and the subject of composition. University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallego-Arrufat, M.-J., & Gutiérrez-Santiuste, E. (2015). Perception of democracy in computer-mediated communication: Participation, responsibility, collaboration, and reflection. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(1), 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2014.957270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton-Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Han, E. H., & Keene, S. L. (2021). Community building for better outcomes: Our silver lining from teaching in a pandemic. The Second Draft, 34(1), 1–8. https://perma.cc/XG2H-RUTD
   Google Scholar
• Hartshorne, R., Baumgartner, E., Kaplan-Rakowski, R., Mouza, C., & Ferdig, R. E. (2020). Preservice and inservice professional development during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 137–147. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/216910/
   Google Scholar
• He, J., & Huang, X. (2017). Collaborative online teamwork: Exploring students’ satisfaction and attitudes with Google Hangouts as a supplementary communication tool. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 49(3-4), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2017.1327334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herring, S. C. (2001). Computer-mediated discourse. In D. Tannen, D. Schiffrin, & H. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 612–634). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hokanson, S. C., Grannan, S., Greenler, R., Gillian-Daniel, D. L., Campa, H., & Goldberg, B. B. (2019). A study of synchronous, online professional development workshops for graduate students and postdocs reveals the value of reflection and community building. Innovative Higher Education, 44(5), 385–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-019-9470-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzman, L. (2014). “Vygotskian-izing” psychotherapy. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 21(3), 184–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2013.828312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, P. B., Sheffield, C. C., Shelton, A. L., & Vujaklija, A. R. (2017). Backchannel discussions during classroom observations: Connecting theory and practice in real time. Middle School Journal, 48(2), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2017.1272919
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, P. (2019). Talking children into literacy: Once more, with feeling. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 68(1), 64–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2381336919877854
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. H., & Chik, A. (2015). Hafner, C. A. (Eds.), Discourse and digital practices: Doing discourse analysis in the digital age. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Khalid, F. (2019). Students’ identities and its relationships with their engagement in an online learning community. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(05), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i05.8196
   Google Scholar
• Kim, G. M. (2019). ‘ Do they really do that in Korea?’: Multicultural learning through Hallyu media. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(4), 473–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1620768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, G. M., & Johnson, L. L. (2021). Playful practices: Reimagining literacy teacher education through game-based curriculum design. Research in the Teaching of English, 55(3), 241–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Latta, M. M., & Kim, J. H. (2009). Narrative inquiry invites professional development: Educators claim the creative space of praxis. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903333114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., Schallert, D. L., Song, K., Park, Y., Chiang, Y. V., Vogler, J. S., Jordan, M. E., Lee, J., Cheng, A. J., Sanders, A. Z., & Park, J. (2011). Resistance phenomena in collaborative online discussions. Yearbook of the Literacy Research Association, 60, 370–388.
   Google Scholar
• Li, J., & Greenhow, C. (2015). Scholars and social media: Tweeting in the conference backchannel for professional learning. Educational Media International, 52(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2015.1005426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, J., & Hall, B. M. (2015). Intersubjectivity in theoretical and practical online courses. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 16(4), 45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Luhrs, C., & McAnally-Salas, L. (2016). Collaboration levels in asynchronous discussion forums: A social network analysis approach. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 14(1), 29–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luppicini, R. (2007). Review of computer mediated communication research for education. Instructional Science, 35(2), 141–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-006-9001-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackey, T. (2016). Asynchronous online learning. In S. L. Danver (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of online education (pp. 120–129). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483318332.n42
   Google Scholar
• McEneaney, J. E. (2001). Graphic and numerical methods to assess navigation in hypertext. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55(5), 761–786. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2001.0505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeskey, J., & Waldron, N. L. (2002). Professional development and inclusive schools: reflections on effective practice. The Teacher Educator, 37(3), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730209555291
   Google Scholar
• McNely, B. J. (2009). Backchannel persistence and collaborative meaning-making. In B. Mehlenbacher, A. Protopsaltis, A. Williams, & S. Slattery (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication. (pp. 297–304). ACM Digital Library. https://doi.org/10.1145/1621995.1622053
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, B. (2018). “But isn’t the teacher supposed to tell us?”: Illuminating transactional reading processes through transmediation in the ELA classroom. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 14(2), 1–11. http://jolle.coe.uga.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Nash_JoLLE2018.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, B. (2022). “We felt like pioneers”: Exploring the social and emotional dimensions of English teachers’ learning during online professional development. Journal of Online Learning Research, 8(1), 101–125. https://learntechlib.org/p/220426/
   Google Scholar
• Nash, B., Reyes, M., Williamson, M., & Hedgecock, M. B. (2021). Inquiries into digital funds of knowledge: Envisioning a sociocritical digital reading curriculum. English Leadership Quarterly, 44(2), 1–7. https://library.ncte.org/journals/elq/issues/v44-2/31527
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, D. C., Barry, A. L., & Staab, P. T. (2008). Teachers’ reflections of professional change during a literacy-reform initiative. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(5), 1288–1303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, S. A., Hutchison, A. C., Hall, L. A., Parsons, A. W., Ives, S. T., & Leggett, A. B. (2019). U.S. teachers’ perceptions of online professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education. An International Journal of Research and Studies, 82(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.03.006
   Google Scholar
• Pinar, S., Bardakçi, M., & Arslan, F. Y. (2021). Factors influencing teachers’ professional learning: A study of Turkish EFL teachers. Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi, 17(1), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.903367
   Google Scholar
• Powell, C. G., & Bodur, Y. (2019). Teachers’ perceptions of an online professional development experience: Implications for a design and implementation framework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior, P. A. (2010). Hengst, J. A. (Eds.), Exploring semiotic remediation as discourse practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.2307/1176586
   Google Scholar
• Rathakrishnan, M., Raman, A., Singh, M. K. S., & Choi, L. J. (2018). The effect of backchannel communication in developing students’ critical thinking skills. The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Special Issue, 6, 69–74. https://doi.org/10.32861/jssr.spi6.69.74
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., Friedrichsen, P., Zangori, L., & Ke, L. (2020). Technology-supported professional development for collaborative design of COVID-19 instructional materials. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 171–177. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/216087/
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Schallert, D. L., Reed, J. H., & the D-Team. (2003). Intellectual, motivational, textual, and cultural considerations in teaching and learning with computer-mediated discussion. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(2), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2003.10782407
   Google Scholar
• Schallert, D. L., Song, K., Jordan, M. E., Lee, S., Park, Y., Kim, T., Cheng, A. J., Chu, H.-N R., Vogler, J. S., & Lee, J. E. (2016). Shifts in trajectories in thought communities and “wobbly” identities enacted in computer-mediated classroom discussions. International Journal of Educational Research, 80, 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B. E. (2017). Composing across modes: A comparative analysis of adolescents’ multimodal composing processes. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(3), 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1182924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, R., Sinno, J., Hatfield, K., Biderman, M., Doria, N., & Numer, M. (2020). Exploring Top Hat’s impact on undergraduate students’ belongingness, engagement, and self-confidence: A mixed methods study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(2), 197–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1722977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tate, T., & Warschauer, M. (2022). Equity in online learning. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2062597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. (2016). How to do your case study (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Trust, T. (2017). Using cultural historical activity theory to examine how teachers seek and share knowledge in a peer-to-peer professional development network. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(1), 98–113. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vavasseur, C. B., & MacGregor, K. (2008). Extending content-focused professional development through online communities of practice. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(4), 517–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2008.10782519
   Google Scholar
• Vogler, J. S., Schallert, D. L., Jordan, M. E., Song, K., Sanders, A. J. Z., Chiang, Y. Y. T., Lee, J., Park, J., & Yu, L.-T. (2017). Life history of a topic in an online discussion: A complex systems theory perspective on how one message attracts class members to create meaning collaboratively. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12(2), 173–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9255-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogler, J. S., Schallert, D. L., Park, Y., Song, K., Chiang, Y. V., Jordan, M. E., Lee, S., Cheng, A. J., Lee, J., Park, J., & Sanders, A. J. Z. (2013). A microgenetic analysis of classroom discussion practices: How literacy processes intermingle in the negotiation of meaning in an online discussion. Journal of Literacy Research, 45(3), 211–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X13499846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, W. T. (2021). Embracing the digital backchannel. Voices from the Middle, 28(4), 51–53.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, K., Yu, C., & Bradshaw, A. C. (2014). Impacts of role assignment and participation in asynchronous discussions in college-level online classes. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yardi, S. (2006). The role of the backchannel in collaborative learning environments. In S. A. Barab, K. E. Hay, & D. T. Hickey (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of Learning Sciences (pp. 852–858). ACM Digital Library. https://doi.org/10.5555/1150034.1150158
   Google Scholar
• Zengilowski, A., & Schallert, D. L. (2020). Using “plain vanilla” online discussions to foster students’ learning: From research to practice. In L. Wilton & C. Brett (Eds.), Handbook of research on online discussion-based teaching methods (pp. 26–54). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-3292-8.ch002
   Google Scholar