References
- Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2013). Evolutionary psychology: New perspectives on cognition and motivation. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 201–229. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131628
- Evans, J.St.B.T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgement, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
- Evans, J.St.B.T., & Stanovich, K.E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 8, 223–241. doi:10.1177/1745691612460685
- Gervais, W.M., & Norenzayan, A. (2012). Analytic thinking promotes religious disbelief. Science, 336, 493–496. doi:10.1126/science.1215647
- Gigerenzer, G. (1996). On narrow norms and vague heuristics: A reply to Kahneman and Tversky (1996). Psychological Review, 103, 592–596. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.592
- Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316, 998–1002. doi:10.1126/science.1137651
- Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgement and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697–720. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697
- Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
- Lucas, E., & Ball, L. (2005). Think-aloud protocols and the selection task: Evidence for relevance effects and rationalisation processes. Thinking & Reasoning, 11(1), 35–66. doi:10.1080/13546780442000114
- Pennycook, G. (2014). Evidence that analytic cognitive style influences religious belief: Comment on Razmyar and Reeve (2013). Intelligence, 43, 21–26. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2013.12.005
- Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J.A., Barr, N., Koehler, D.J., & Fugelsang, J.A. (2014a). Cognitive style and religiosity: The role of conflict detection. Memory & Cognition, 42(1), 1–10. doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0340-7
- Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J.A., Barr, N., Koehler, D.J., & Fugelsang, J.A. (2014b). The role of analytic thinking in moral judgements and values. Thinking & Reasoning, 20, 188–214. doi:10.1080/13546783.2013.865000
- Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J.A., Koehler, D.J., & Fugelsang, J.A. (2013). Belief bias during reasoning among religious believers and skeptics. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 806–811. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0394-3
- Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J.A., Seli, P., Koehler, D.J., & Fugelsang, J.A. (2012). Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief. Cognition, 123, 335–346. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.003
- Razmyar, S., & Reeve, C.L. (2013). Individual differences in religiosity as a function of cognitive ability and style. Intelligence, 41, 667–673. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2013.09.003
- Shenhav, A., Rand, D.G., & Greene, J.D. (2012). Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in god. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 423–428. doi:10.1037/a0025391
- Stanovich, K.E. (2004). The Robot's rebellion: Finding meaning in the age of Darwin. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Stanovich, K.E., & West, R.F. (2003). Evolutionary versus instrumental goals: How evolutionary psychology misconceives human rationality. In D.E. Over (Ed.), Evolution and the psychology of thinking: The debate (pp. 171–230). Hove and New York, NY: Psychological Press.
- Thompson, V.A. (2013). Why it matters: The implications of autonomous processes for dual process theories—Commentary on Evans & Stanovich (2013). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 253–256. doi:10.1177/1745691613483476
- Wason, P.C., & Evan, J St B T. (1975). Dual processes in reasoning?. Cognition, 3, 141–154. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(74)90017-1