Priming of supernatural agent concepts and agency detection

References

• Atran, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2004). Religion's evolutionary landscape: Counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 713–730; discussion 730–770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, K., & Gibson, N. J. S. (2013). Supernatural agency: Individual difference predictors and situational correlates. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 23(1), 42–62. doi:10.1080/10508619.2013.739066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, J. L. (1998). Cognitive constraints on Hindu concepts of the divine. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37, 608–619. doi:10.2307/1388144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, J. L. (2000). Exploring the natural foundations of religion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(1), 29–34. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01419-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, J. L. (2011). Cognitive science of religion: Looking back, looking forward. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 50, 229–239. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2011.01564.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, J. L., & Burdett, E. R. (2011). The cognitive science of religion. Psychologist, 24, 252–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, J. L., & Keil, F. C. (1996). Conceptualizing a nonnatural entity: Anthropomorphism in god concepts. Cognitive Psychology, 31, 219–247. doi:10.1006/cogp.1996.0017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, J. L., & Lanman, J. A. (2008). The science of religious beliefs. Religion, 38(2), 109–124. doi:10.1016/j.religion.2008.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bering, J. M. (2006). The folk psychology of souls. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29(5), 453–462; discussion 462–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakemore, S. J., & Decety, J. (2001). From the perception of action to the understanding of intention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 561–567. doi:10.1038/35080587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogacz, R., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Forstmann, B. U., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2010). The neural basis of the speed–accuracy tradeoff. Trends in Neurosciences, 33(1), 10–16. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2009.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1988). An evolutionary model of social learning: The effects of spatial and temporal variation. In T. R. Zentall & B. G. Galef (Eds.), Social learning: Psychological and biological perspectives (pp. 29–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, P. (2003). Religious thought and behaviour as by-products of brain function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 119–124. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00031-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, P., & Lienard, P. (2006). Why ritualized behavior? Precaution systems and action parsing in developmental, pathological and cultural rituals. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29, 595–613; discussion 613–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulbulia, J. (2004). The cognitive and evolutionary psychology of religion. Biology & Philosophy, 19, 655–686. doi:10.1007/s10539-005-5568-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnage, G. (1990). CELEX: A guide for users. Nijmegen: Center for Lexical Information, Radboud University of Nijmegen.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, T. P., & Marshall, M. A. (2009). An examination of religious priming and intrinsic religious motivation in the moral hypocrisy paradigm. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 48, 386–393. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01454.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, L. G., & Schaller, M. (2002). On the verifiability of evolutionary psychological theories: An analysis of the psychology of scientific persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 152–166. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0602_04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craje, C., van Elk, M., Beeren, M., van Schie, H. T., Bekkering, H., & Steenbergen, B. (2010). Compromised motor planning and motor imagery in right hemiparetic cerebral palsy. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31, 1313–1322. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2010.07.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epley, N., Waytz, A., Akalis, S., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2008). When we need a human: Motivational determinants of anthropomorphism. Social Cognition, 26, 143–155. doi:10.1521/soco.2008.26.2.143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganesh, S., van Schie, H. T., de Lange, F. P., Thompson, E., & Wigboldus, D. H. J. (2012). How the human brain goes virtual: Distinct cortical regions of the person-processing network are involved in self-identification with virtual agents. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 1577–1585. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais, W. M., Willard, A. K., Norenzayan, A., & Henrich, J. (2011). The cultural transmission of faith: why innate intuitions are necessary, but insufficient, to explain religious belief. Religion, 41, 389–410. doi:10.1080/0048721X.2011.604510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobbini, M. I., Koralek, A. C., Bryan, R. E., Montgomery, K. J., & Haxby, J. V. (2007). Two takes on the social brain: A comparison of theory of mind tasks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1803–1814. doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.11.1803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorsuch, R. L., & Mcpherson, S. E. (1989). Intrinsic-extrinsic measurement, I/E-revised and single-item scales. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28, 348–354. doi:10.2307/1386745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosselin, F., & Schyns, P. G. (2003). Superstitious perceptions reveal properties of internal representations. Psychological Science, 14, 505–509. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.03452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, S. J. (1985). Not necessarily a wing. Natural History, 94, 12–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, D., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G. (1976). Within-subjects designs - To use or not to use. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 314–320. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.83.2.314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, S. (1980). A cognitive theory of religion. Current Anthropology, 21(2), 181–203. doi:10.1086/202429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, S. (1993). Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Han, S. H., Mao, L. H., Gu, X. S., Zhu, Y., Ge, J. Q., & Ma, Y. N. (2008). Neural consequences of religious belief on self-referential processing. Social Neuroscience, 3(1), 1–15. doi:10.1080/17470910701469681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haselton, M. G., & Nettle, D. (2006). The paranoid optimist: An integrative evolutionary model of cognitive biases. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(1), 47–66. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heekeren, H. R., Marrett, S., Bandettini, P. A., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2004). A general mechanism for perceptual decision-making in the human brain. Nature, 431, 859–862. doi:10.1038/nature02966
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. The American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243–259. doi:10.2307/1416950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, R. W., Hill, D. E., & Spilka, B. (2009). The psychology of religion: An empirical approach. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Inzlicht, M., & Tullett, A. M. (2010). Reflecting on god: Religious primes can reduce neurophysiological response to errors. Psychological Science, 21, 1184–1190. doi:10.1177/0956797610375451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapogiannis, D., Barbey, A. K., Su, M., Zamboni, G., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2009). Cognitive and neural foundations of religious belief. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 4876–4881. doi:10.1073/pnas.0811717106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D., & Rosset, E. (2009). The human function compunction: Teleological explanation in adults. Cognition, 111(1), 138–143. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D., Rottman, J., & Seston, R. (2013). Professional physical scientists display tenacious teleological tendencies: Purpose-based reasoning as a cognitive default. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General, 142, 1074–1083. doi:10.1037/a0030399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerns, J. G., & Berenbaum, H. (2000). Aberrant semantic and affective processing in people at risk for psychosis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 728–732. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.109.4.728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketelaar, T., & Ellis, B. J. (2000). Are evolutionary explanations unfalsifiable? Evolutionary psychology and the Lakatosian philosophy of science. Psychological Inquiry, 11(1), 1–21. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1101_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig, H. G., McCullough, M. E., & Larson, D. B. (2001). Handbook of religion and health. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krummenacher, P., Mohr, C., Haker, H., & Brugger, P. (2010). Dopamine, paranormal belief, and the detection of meaningful stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1670–1681. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, R. T. (1997). Measuring the image of god: The god image inventory and the god image scales. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 25, 214–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, E. T. (2012). Religious thought and behavior. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Cognitive Science, 3, 525–532. doi:10.1002/wcs.1189
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lawson, E. T., & McCauley, R. N. (2000). Bringing ritual to mind: Psychological foundations of cultural forms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, J. (2009). How faith heals: a theoretical model. EXPLORE: The Journal of Science and Healing, 5(2), 77–96. doi:10.1016/j.explore.2008.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindeman, M., & Aarnio, K. (2007a). Religious people and paranormal believers: Alike or different. Journal of Individual Differences, 28(1), 1–9. doi:10.1027/1614-0001.28.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Lindeman, M., & Aarnio, K. (2007b). Superstitious, magical, and paranormal beliefs: An integrative model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 731–744. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2006.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisdorf, A. (2007). What's HIDD'n in the HADD? Journal of Cognition and Culture, 7, 341–353. doi:10.1163/156853707X208549
   Google Scholar
• Macmilan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user's guide. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Masson, M. E. J. (1995). A distributed-memory model of semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 21(1), 3–23. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masson, M. E. J. (2011). A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 679–690. doi:10.3758/s13428-010-0049-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, R. T., & Dennett, D. C. (2009). The evolution of misbelief. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(6), 493–510. doi:10.1017/S0140525X09990975
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mckay, R., & Efferson, C. (2010). The subtleties of error management. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(5), 309–319. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264–336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Norenzayan, A., Hansen, I. G., & Cady, J. (2008). An angry volcano? Reminders of death and anthropomorphizing nature. Social Cognition, 26, 190–197. doi:10.1521/soco.2008.26.2.190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norenzayan, A., & Shariff, A. F. (2008). The origin and evolution of religious prosociality. Science, 322, 58–62. doi:10.1126/science.1158757
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrican, R., & Burris, C. T. (2012). Am I the stone? Overattribution of agency and religious orientation. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 4, 312–323. doi:10.1037/a0027942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichon, I., Boccato, G., & Saroglou, V. (2007). Nonconscious influences of religion on prosociality: A priming study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1032–1045. doi:10.1002/ejsp.416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollack, D. (2008). Religious change in Europe: Theoretical considerations and empirical findings. Social Compass, 55, 168–186. doi:10.1177/0037768607089737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, J., Wegner, D. M., & Aarts, H. (2008). Effects of subliminal priming of self and god on self-attribution of authorship for events. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(1), 2–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyysiainen, I. (2012). Putting cognition and culture back together again: Religion in mind and society. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, 24(1), 29–50. doi:10.1163/157006811X609150
   Google Scholar
• Pyysiainen, I., & Hauser, M. (2010). The origins of religion: Evolved adaptation or by-product? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 104–109. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.12.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riekki, T., Lindeman, M., Aleneff, M., Halme, A., & Nuortimo, A. (2013). Paranormal and religious believers are more prone to illusory face perception than skeptics and non-believers. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 150–155. doi:10.1002/acp.2874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riekki, T., Lindeman, M., & Raij, T. T. (2014). Supernatural believers attribute more intentions to random movement than skeptics: An fMRI study. Social Neuroscience, 9(4), 1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saler, B. (2010). Theory and criticism: The cognitive science of religion. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, 22, 330–339. doi:10.1163/157006810X531111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saroglou, V., Corneille, O., & Van Cappellen, P. (2009). “Speak, lord, your servant is listening”: Religious priming activates submissive thoughts and behaviors. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 19, 143–154. doi:10.1080/10508610902880063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saroglou, V., Pichon, I., Trompette, L., Verschueren, M., & Dernelle, R. (2005). Prosocial behavior and religion: New evidence based on projective measures and peer ratings. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44, 323–348. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2005.00289.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schjoedt, U., Stodkilde-Jorgensen, H., Geertz, A. W., & Roepstorff, A. (2009). Highly religious participants recruit areas of social cognition in personal prayer. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4, 199–207. doi:10.1093/scan/nsn050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 333–367. doi:10.1080/01690960344000198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. (2007). God is watching you: Priming god concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science, 18, 803–809. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01983.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shermer, M. (2008). Patternicity. Scientific American, 299, 48–48. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1208-48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shermer, M. (2009). Agenticity. Scientific American, 300, 36–36. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0609-36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosis, R. (2003). Why aren't we all hutterities? Costly signaling theory and religious behavior. Human Nature, 14(2), 91–127. doi:10.1007/s12110-003-1000-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosis, R. (2004). The adaptive value of religious ritual. American Scientist, 92, 166–172. doi:10.1511/2004.46.928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperber, R. D., Mccauley, C., Ragain, R. D., & Weil, C. M. (1979). Semantic priming effects on picture and word processing. Memory & Cognition, 7, 339–345. doi:10.3758/BF03196937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobacyk, J. (2004). A revised paranormal belief scale. The International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 23, 94–98.
   Google Scholar
• Valdesolo, P., & Graham, J. (2014). Awe, uncertainty, and agency detection. Psychological Science, 25(1), 170–178. doi:10.1177/0956797613501884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Cappellen, P., Corneille, O., Cols, S., & Saroglou, V. (2011). Beyond mere compliance to authoritative figures: Religious priming increases conformity to informational influence among submissive people. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 21(2), 97–105. doi:10.1080/10508619.2011.556995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Elk, M. (2013). Paranormal believers are more prone to illusory agency detection than skeptics. Consciousness and Cognition, 22, 1041–1046. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2013.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Elk, M., van Schie, H. T., & Bekkering, H. (2009). Short-term action intentions overrule long-term semantic knowledge. Cognition, 111(1), 72–83. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Elk, M., van Schie, H. T., & Bekkering, H. (2010). From left to right: Processing acronyms referring to names of political parties activates spatial associations. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 2202–2219. doi:10.1080/17470218.2010.495160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 779–804. doi:10.3758/BF03194105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waytz, A., Morewedge, C. K., Epley, N., Monteleone, G., Gao, J.-H., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010). Making sense by making sentient: Effectance motivation increases anthropomorphism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 410–435. doi:10.1037/a0020240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weingarten, C. P., & Chisholm, J. S. (2009). Attachment and cooperation in religious groups: an example of a mechanism for cultural group selection. Current Anthropology, 50, 759–785. doi:10.1086/605767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitson, J. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Lacking control increases illusory pattern perception. Science, 322, 115–117. doi:10.1126/science.1159845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willard, A. K., & Norenzayan, A. (2013). Cognitive biases explain religious belief, paranormal belief, and belief in life's purpose. Cognition, 129, 379–391. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.07.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar