References
- Asprem, E. (in press). Reverse-engineering esotericism: How to prepare a complex cultural concept for the cognitive science of religion. Religion. doi:10.1080/0048721X.2015.1072589
- Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 1–24. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12002440
- Gerrans, P. (2014). The measure of madness: Philosophy of mind, cognitive neuroscience, and delusional thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Marcus, G. F., & Davis, E. (2013). How robust are probabilistic models of higher-level cognition? Psychological Science, 24(12), 2351–2360. doi: 10.1177/0956797613495418
- Nisbett, R. E., & Miyamoto, Y. (2005). The influence of culture: Holistic versus analytic perception. TRENDS in Cognitive Science, 9(10), 467–473. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.004
- Orlandi, N. (2011). The innocent eye: Seeing-as without concepts. American Philosophical Quarterly, 48(1), 17–31.
- Pylyshyn, Z. (1999). Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(3), 341–365.
- Sharf, R. H. (1995). Buddhist modernism and the rhetoric of meditative experience. Numen, 42, 228–283. doi: 10.1163/1568527952598549
- Sharf, R. H. (2000). The rhetoric of experience and the study of religion. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 7(11–12), 267–287.
- Slingerland, E. (2008). Who’s afraid of reductionism? The study of religion in the age of cognitive science. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 76(2), 375–411. doi: 10.1093/jaarel/lfn004
- Taves, A. (2015). Reverse engineering complex cultural concepts: Identifying building blocks of ‘religion’. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 15, 197–221. doi: 10.1163/15685373-12342146