References
- Baker, J. O., & Smith, B. G. (2015). American secularism: Cultural contours of nonreligious belief systems. New York: NYU Press.
- Durkheim, E. ([1912] 1976). The elementary forms of the religious life. New York: Routledge.
- Eberstadt, M. (2013). How the West really lost god: A new theory of secularization. West Conshohocken, PA: Templeton Foundation Press.
- Flache, A. (2002). The rational weakness of strong ties: Failure of group solidarity in a highly cohesive group of rational agents. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 26, 189–216. doi: 10.1080/00222500212988
- Fuller, R. C. (2001). Spiritual, but not religious: Understanding unchurched America. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Galen, L. W., & Kloet, J. (2011). Personality and social integration factors distinguishing nonreligious from religious groups: The importance of controlling for attendance and demographics. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 33, 205–228. doi: 10.1163/157361211X570047
- Gallup. (2016). Religion historical trends. Gallup Polling, Washington, DC. Retrieved January 1, 2016, from http://www.gallup.com/poll/1690/religion.aspx
- Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380. doi: 10.1086/225469
- Hout, M., & Fischer, C. S. (2002). Why more Americans have no religious preference: Politics and generations. American Sociological Review, 67, 165–190. doi: 10.2307/3088891
- Hout, M., & Fischer, C. S. (2014). Explaining why more Americans have no religious preference: Political backlash and generational succession, 1987–2012. Sociological Science, 14, 423–447. doi: 10.15195/v1.a24
- Lawler, E. J., Thye, S. R., & Yoon, J. (2009). Social commitments in a depersonalized world. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
- Lewis, V. A., MacGregor, C. A., & Putnam, R. D. (2013). Religion, networks, and neighborliness: The impact of religious social networks on civic engagement. Social Science Research, 42, 331–346. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.09.011
- Lim, C., & Putnam, R. D. (2010). Religion, social networks, and life satisfaction. American Sociological Review, 75, 914–933. doi: 10.1177/0003122410386686
- McCaffree, K. J. (2014). Faith, Christianity, and non-affiliation in the United States (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0wx6z9sp
- McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
- Norenzayan, A., Henrich, J., & Slingerland, E. (2013). Religious prosociality: A synthesis. In P. J. Richerson, & M. H. Christiansen (Eds.), Cultural evolution: Society, technology, language and religion (pp. 365–378). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Pew Research Center. (2012). “Nones” on the rise: Religion and the unaffiliated. Religion and Public Life Pew Report, Retrieved from http://www.pewforum.org/2012/10/09/nones-on-the-rise-religion/
- Pew Research Center. (2015). Millennials increasingly are driving growth of “nones’. Fact Tank: News in the Numbers, Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/05/12/millennials-increasingly-are-driving-growth-of-nones/
- Putnam, R., & Campbell, D. (2010). American grace: How religion is reshaping our civic and political lives. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
- Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. (2007). God is watching you: Priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science, 18, 803–809. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01983.x
- Taves, A. (2009). Religious experience reconsidered: A building-block approach to the study of religion and other special things. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
- Turner, J. H. (2012). Theoretical principles of sociology, volume 1: Macrodynamics (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Springer.
- Voas, D. (2003). Intermarriage and the demography of secularization. The British Journal of Sociology, 54, 83–108. doi: 10.1080/0007131032000045914
- Zuckerman, P. (2014). The rise of the nones: Why more Americans are becoming secular, and what that means for America. In Theism and public policy (pp. 37–52). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.