120
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Commentaries

Where one stops the car: on the importance of what one takes “religion” to be

ORCID Icon
Pages 437-442 | Received 22 Feb 2017, Accepted 26 Feb 2017, Published online: 11 Jul 2017

References

  • Alcorta, C. S., & Sosis, R. (2005). Ritual, emotion, and sacred symbols. Human Nature, 16(4), 323–359. doi: 10.1007/s12110-005-1014-3
  • Anderson, A. (2013). To the ends of the earth: Pentecostalism and the transformation of world Christianity. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Anttonen, V. (2000a). The sacred. In W. Braun & R. McCutcheon (Eds.), Guide to the study of religion (pp. 271–282). London: Cassell.
  • Anttonen, V. (2000b). Toward a cognitive theory of the sacred: An ethnographic approach. Folklore., 14, 41–48.
  • Banerjee, K., & Bloom, P. (2013). Would Tarzan believe in god? Conditions for the emergence of religious belief. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(1), 7–8. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.11.005
  • Berger, P. (1967). The sacred canopy: Elements of a sociological theory of religion. New York: Doubleday.
  • Berger, P. (1980). The heretical imperative. Garden City, NY: Doubleday/Anchor Books.
  • Bering, J. M. (2002). Intuitive conceptions of dead agents’ minds: The natural foundations of afterlife beliefs as phenomenological boundary. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 2, 263–308. doi: 10.1163/15685370260441008
  • Bloom, P. (2007). Religion is natural. Developmental Science, 10, 147–151. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00577.x
  • Brenner, R. R. (2014). The faith and doubt of holocaust survivors. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
  • Curry, O. S., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2013). Sharing a joke: The effects of a similar sense of humor on affiliation and altruism. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(2), 125–129. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.11.003
  • Day, A. (2012). Nominal Christian adherence: Ethnic, natal, aspirational. Implicit Religion, 15(4), 439–456. doi: 10.1558/imre.v15i4.439
  • Dennett, D. (2006). Breaking the spell: Religion as a natural phenomenon. New York: Penguin Books.
  • Durkheim, E. (1995 [1912]). The elementary forms of religious life. New York: The Free Press.
  • Gendler, T. S. (2008). Alief and belief. Journal of Philosophy, 105(10), 634–663. doi: 10.5840/jphil20081051025
  • Gervais, M., & Wilson, D. S. (2005). The evolution and functions of laughter and humor: A synthetic approach. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 80(4), 395–430. doi: 10.1086/498281
  • Gervais, W. M., Willard, A. K., Norenzayan, A., & Henrich, J. (2011). The cultural transmission of faith: Why innate intuitions are necessary, but insufficient, to explain religious belief. Religion, 41, 389–410. doi: 10.1080/0048721X.2011.604510
  • Guthrie, S. (1995). Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Heywood, B. T., & Bering, J. M. (2014). “Meant to be”: How religious beliefs and cultural religiosity affect the implicit bias to think teleologically. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 4, 183–201. doi: 10.1080/2153599X.2013.782888
  • Hull, D. (1978). Sociobiology: Scientific bandwagon or traveling medicine show? Transaction Society, 15(6), 50–59.
  • James, W. (1902). The varieties of religious experience. London: Longmans, Green.
  • Johnson, D., & Bering, J. (2010). Hand of god, mind of man: Punishment and cognition in the evolution of cooperation. In J. Schloss & M. Murray (Eds.), The believing primate: Scientific, philosophical, and theological reflections on the origin of religion (pp. 26–43). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kelemen, D. (2004). Are children “intuitive theists”? Reasoning about purpose and design in nature. Psychological Science, 15, 295–301. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00672.x
  • Lease, G. (2000). The definition of religion: An analytical or hermeneutical task? Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 12, 287–293. doi: 10.1163/157006800X00193
  • Lenfesty, H. L., & Schloss, J. P. (2015). Big gods and the greater good. Religion, Brain, and Behavior, 5(4), 305–313. doi: 10.1080/2153599X.2014.928357
  • Luckmann, T. (1970). The invisible religion: The problem of religion in modern society. New York: MacMillan.
  • McRoberts, O. M. (2004). Beyond mysterium tremendum: Thoughts toward an aesthetic study of religious experience. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 595(1), 190–203. doi: 10.1177/0002716204267111
  • Norenzayan, A. (2013). Big gods: How religion transformed cooperation and conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Norenzayan, A., Shariff, A. F., Gervais, W. M., Willard, A. K., McNamara, R. A., Slingerland, E., & Henrich, J. (2016). The cultural evolution of prosocial religions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39(1), 1–65. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X14001356
  • Otto, R. (1923/1917). The idea of the holy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Pargament, K. I., Magyar-Russell, G. M., & Murray-Swank, N. A. (2005). The sacred and the search for significance: Religion as a unique process. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 665–687. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00426.x
  • Pyysiäinen, I. (1996). Belief and beyond: Religious categorization of reality. Abo: Abo Akademi.
  • Pyysiäinen, I. (2004). Magic, miracles, and religion. (Series in cognitive science of religion). Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.
  • Rappaport, R. A. (1999). Ritual and religion in the making of humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Renfrew, C. (2001). Production and consumption in a sacred economy: The material correlates of high devotional expression at Chaco Canyon. American Antiquity, 66(1), 14–25. doi: 10.2307/2694314
  • Renfrew, C. (2008). Neuroscience, evolution and the sapient paradox: The factuality of value and of the sacred. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363, 2041–2047. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0010
  • Schilbrack, K. (2013). What isn’t religion?. The Journal of Religion, 93(3), 291–318. doi: 10.1086/670276
  • Schloss, J. (2007). He who laughs best: Religious affect as a solution to recursive cooperative defection. In J. Bubulia, R. Sosis, E. Harris, R. Genet, C. Genet, & K. Wyman (Eds.), The evolution of religion: Studies, theories, and critiques (pp. 205–215). Santa Margarita: Collins Foundation Press.
  • Schloss, J. (2010). Evolutionary theories of religion: Science set free or naturalism run wild? In J. Schloss & M. Murray (Eds.), The believing primate: Scientific, philosophical, and theological perspectives on the origin of religion (pp. 1–25). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Schloss, J. P., & Murray, M. J. (2011). Evolutionary accounts of belief in supernatural punishment: A critical review. Religion, Brain, and Behavior, 1(1), 46–99. doi: 10.1080/2153599X.2011.558707
  • Smith, J. Z. (1996). A matter of class: Taxonomies of religion. The Harvard Theological Review, 89(4), 387–403. doi: 10.1017/S0017816000006118
  • Sosis, R. (2011). Why sacred lands are not indivisible: The cognitive foundations of sacralising land. Journal of Terrorism Research, 2(1), 17–44. doi: 10.15664/jtr.172
  • Sosis, R., & Kiper, J. (2014). Religion is more than belief: What evolutionary theories of religion tell us about religious commitments. In M. Bergmann & P. Kain (Eds.), Challenges to moral and religious belief (pp. 256–276). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Sterelny, K. (2014). A paleolithic reciprocation crisis: Symbols, signals, and norms. Biological Theory, 9(1), 65–77. doi: 10.1007/s13752-013-0143-x
  • Sterelny, K. (2015). Content, control and display: The natural origins of content. Philosophia, 43(3), 549–564. doi: 10.1007/s11406-015-9628-0
  • Taves, A. (2009). Religious experience reconsidered: A building-block approach to the study of religion and other special things. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Uecker, J. E., Regnerus, M. D., & Vaaler, M. L. (2007). Losing my religion: The social sources of religious decline in early adulthood. Social Forces, 85(4), 1667–1692. doi: 10.1353/sof.2007.0083
  • Weber, M. (1947). The nature of charismatic authority and its routinization. In M. Weber (Ed.), The theory of social and economic organizations, trans. A. M. Henderson and T. Parsons (pp. 358–392). New York: The Free Press.
  • Ysseldyk, R., Matheson, K., & Anisman, H. (2010). Religiosity as identity: Toward an understanding of religion from a social identity perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 60–71. doi: 10.1177/1088868309349693

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.