Using findings from the cognitive science of religion to understand current conflicts between religious and scientific ideologies

References

• Allum, N., Sibley, E., Sturgis, P., & Stoneman, P. (2014). Religious beliefs, knowledge about science and attitudes towards medical genetics. Public Understanding of Science, 23(7), 833–849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ark Encounter LLC et al. vs. Bob Stewart et al. (2015) No. 3:2015cv00013 (Eastern District of Kentucky)
   Google Scholar
• Baker, J. O. (2012). Public perceptions of incompatibility between “science and religion”. Public Understanding of Science, 0963662511434908. doi: 10.1177/0963662511434908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamford, C., & Lagattuta, K. H. (2010). A new look at children’s understanding of mind and emotion: The case of prayer. Developmental Psychology, 46(1), 78–92. doi: 10.1037/a0016694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, J. L. (2004). Why would anyone believe in God? Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumard, N., & Boyer, P. (2013). Religious beliefs as reflective elaborations on intuitions: A modified dual-process model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(4), 295–300. doi: 10.1177/0963721413478610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beit-Hallahmi, B. (2007). Atheists: A psychological profile. In M. Martin (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to atheism (pp. 300–317). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bénabou, R., Ticchi, D., & Vindigni, A. (2013) Forbidden Fruits: The Political Economy of Science, Religion and Growth. Princeton University, Research Paper No. 065-2014, Dietrich Economic Theory Center. doi: 10.3386/w21105
   Google Scholar
• Blackford, L. (2016). State awards $18 million tax break to Noah’s Ark theme park. Retrieved June 1, 2016, from www.kentucky.com
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, P. (2007). Religion is natural. Developmental Science, 10(1), 147–151. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00577.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, P. (2008). Being human: Religion: Bound to believe? Nature, 455(7216), 1038–1039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., Kim, E., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2008). Religiosity as a perceptual filter: Examining processes of opinion formation about nanotechnology. Public Understanding of Science. doi: 10.1177/0963662507087304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M., Pennycook, G., Goodwin, B., & McHenry, M. (2014). Reflective minds and open hearts: Cognitive style and personality predict religiosity and spiritual thinking in a community sample. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 736–742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M., Thomson, P., Rockloff, M. J., & Pennycook, G. (2015). Going against the herd: Psychological and cultural factors underlying the “vaccination confidence gap. PloS one, 10(9), e0132562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burris, C. T., & Redden, E. K. (2012). No other gods before Mario? Game preferences among atheistic and religious individuals. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 22(4), 243–251. doi: 10.1080/10508619.2011.638606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control. (2016). State vaccination requirements. Retrieved July 4, 2016, from http://www.cdc.gov
   Google Scholar
• Cheyne, J. A. (2009). Atheism rising: The connection between intelligence, science, and the decline of belief. Skeptic (Altadena, CA), 15(2), 33–38.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, F. (2007). The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colzato, L. S., van Beest, I., van den Wildenberg, W. P., Scorolli, C., Dorchin, S., Meiran, N., ... & Hommel, B. (2010). God: Do I have your attention? Cognition, 117(1), 87–94.
   Google Scholar
• Cope v. Kansas State Board of Education (2016). No. 14-3280 (10th Cir. Apr. 19, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Corriveau, K. H., Chen, E. E., & Harris, P. L. (2015). Judgments about fact and fiction by children from religious and nonreligious backgrounds. Cognitive Science, 39(2), 353–382. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyne, J. A. (2016). Faith versus fact: Why science and religion are incompatible. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, R. (2007). The god delusion. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Ecklund, E. H., Johnson, D. R., Scheitle, C. P., Matthews, K. R., & Lewis, S. W. (2016). Religion among scientists in international context A New study of scientists in eight regions. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 2, 1–9. doi:10.1177/2378023116664353
   Google Scholar
• Ecklund, E. H., & Park, J. Z. (2009). Conflict between religion and science among academic scientists? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 48(2), 276–292. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01447.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecklund, E. H., & Scheitle, C. P. (2007). Religion among academic scientists: Distinctions, disciplines, and demographics. Social Problems, 54(2), 289–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. H. (2011). Epistemological and moral conflict between religion and science. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 50(4), 707–727. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2011.01603.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. H. (2013). The growing social and moral conflict between conservative Protestantism and science. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 52(2), 368–385. doi: 10.1111/jssr.12022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. H., & Evans, M. S. (2008). Religion and science: Beyond the epistemological conflict narrative. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 87–105.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241. doi: 10.1177/1745691612460685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farias, M., Newheiser, A. K., Kahane, G., & de Toledo, Z. (2013). Scientific faith: Belief in science increases in the face of stress and existential anxiety. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(6), 1210–1213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friesen, J. P., Campbell, T. H., & Kay, A. C. (2015). The psychological advantage of unfalsifiability: The appeal of untestable religious and political ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(3), 515–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallup Poll. (2011a). In U.S., 3 in 10 say they take the bible literally. Retrieved May 23, 2017, from http://gallup.com
   Google Scholar
• Gallup Poll. (2011b). Evolution, creationism, intelligent design. Retrieved December 15, 2015, from: http://www.gallup.com
   Google Scholar
• Ganzach, Y., Ellis, S., & Gotlibovski, C. (2013). On intelligence education and religious beliefs. Intelligence, 41(2), 121–128. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2013.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauchat, G. (2012). Politicization of science in the public sphere a study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological Review, 77(2), 167–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais, W. M. (2014). Everything is permitted? People intuitively judge immorality as representative of atheists. PloS one, 9(4), e92302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais, W. M. (2015). Override the controversy: Analytic thinking predicts endorsement of evolution. Cognition, 142, 312–321. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais, W. M., & Norenzayan, A. (2012). Like a camera in the sky? Thinking about God increases public self-awareness and socially desirable responding. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 298–302. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais, W. M., Willard, A. K., Norenzayan, A., & Henrich, J. (2011). The cultural transmission of faith: Why innate intuitions are necessary, but insufficient, to explain religious belief. Religion, 41(3), 389–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giberson, K. W., & Collins, F. S. (2011). The language of science and faith: Straight answers to genuine questions. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life. Intelligence, 24(1), 79–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, S. J. (1997). Nonoverlapping magisteria. Natural History, 106(2), 16–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, P. L., & Giménez, M. (2005). Children’s acceptance of conflicting testimony: The case of death. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 5(1), 143–164. doi: 10.1163/1568537054068606
   Google Scholar
• Hitchens, C. (2008). God is not great: How religion poisons everything. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart.
   Google Scholar
• Hunsberger, B. E., & Altemeyer, B. (2006). Atheists: A groundbreaking study of America’s nonbelievers. Amherst: Prometheus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. R., Scheitle, C. P., & Ecklund, E. H. (2015). Individual religiosity and orientation towards science: Reformulating relationships. Sociological Science, 2, 106–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D. (2004). Are children “intuitive theists”? reasoning about purpose and design in nature. Psychological Science, 15(5), 295–301. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00672.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, E. J., & Witham, L. (1998). Leading scientists still reject God. Nature, 394(6691), 313–313. doi: 10.1038/28478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leuba, J. H. (1916). The belief in God and immortality: A psychological, anthropological and statistical study. Boston, MA: Sherman, French & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Lewandowski, T. (2013). Kansas’s twenty-first century monkey trials and tribulations: An examination of the state board of education’s continuing evolution vs. Creationism controversies and the implications for science instruction in the United States. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 6(4), 437–449.
   Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., & Oberauer, K. (2013). The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science. PLoS One, 8(10), e75637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., & Gignac, G. E. (2013). NASA faked the moon landing—therefore, (climate) science is a hoax an anatomy of the motivated rejection of science. Psychological Science, 24(5), 622–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombrozo, T., Shtulman, A., & Weisberg, M. (2006). The intelligent design controversy: Lessons from psychology and education. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 56–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louisiana Science Education Act “SB733”, Act 473. Louisiana Legislature (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, R., Harvey, J., & Nyborg, H. (2009). Average intelligence predicts atheism rates across 137 nations. Intelligence, 37(1), 11–15. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2008.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma-Kellams, C. (2015). When perceiving the supernatural changes the natural: Religion and agency detection. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 15(3-4), 337–343. doi: 10.1163/15685373-12342154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma-Kellams, C., & Blascovich, J. (2013). Does “science” make you moral? The effects of priming science on moral judgments and behavior. PloS one, 8(3), e57989. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead, L. S., & Mates, A. (2009). Why science standards are important to a strong science curriculum and how states measure up. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2(3), 359–371.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, M., Duncan, R., & Parton, K. (2015). Religion does matter for climate change attitudes and behavior. PloS one, 10(8), e0134868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation. (2014). Science and technology: Public attitudes and understanding. Retrieved December 31, 2015, from www.nsf.gov
   Google Scholar
• Norenzayan, A., & Gervais, W. M. (2013). The origins of religious disbelief. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(1), 20–25. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye, B. & Ham, K. (2014, February 4). Bill Nye Debates Ken Ham [Internet broadcast]. In Answers in Genesis. Petersburg, KY. Retrieved January 2, 2016, from http://debatelive.org
   Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Barr, N., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2014). Cognitive style and religiosity: The role of conflict detection. Memory & Cognition, 42(1), 1–10. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0340-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Barr, N., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2015). On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(6), 549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2013). Belief bias during reasoning among religious believers and skeptics. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(4), 806–811. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0394-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Seli, P., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2012). Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief. Cognition, 123(3), 335–346. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2010). Religion among the millennials. Retrieved July 4, 2016, from www.pewforum.org
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2015a). Nearly all states allow religious exemptions for vaccinations. Retrieved July 4, 2016, from www.pewforum.org
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2015b). Religion and Science: Highly religious Americans are less likely than others to see conflict between faith and science. Retrieved June 12, 2016, from www.pewinternet.org
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2015c). America’s changing religious landscape. Retrieved January 19, 2016, from www.pewforum.org
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2015d). U.S. public becoming less religious. Retrieved December 31, 2015, from www.pewforum.org
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center (2017). U.S. students’ academic achievement still lags that of their peers in many other countries. Retrieved May 24, 2017, from www.pewforum.org.
   Google Scholar
• Preston, J., & Epley, N. (2009). Science and God: An automatic opposition between ultimate explanations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1), 238–241. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, J. L., Ritter, R. S., & Hepler, J. (2013). Neuroscience and the soul: Competing explanations for the human experience. Cognition, 127(1), 31–37. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rios, K., Cheng, Z. H., Totton, R. R., & Shariff, A. F. (2015). Negative stereotypes cause christians to underperform in and disidentify with science. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(8), 959–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rissler, L. J., Duncan, S. I., & Caruso, N. M. (2014). The relative importance of religion and education on university students’ views of evolution in the deep south and state science standards across the United States. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 7(1), 1–17. doi: 10.1186/s12052-014-0024-1
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, S. J., Gow, A. J., & Deary, I. J. (2014). Religiosity is negatively associated with later-life intelligence, but not with age-related cognitive decline. Intelligence, 46, 9–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheitle, C. P. (2011). Religious and spiritual change in college assessing the effect of a science education. Sociology of Education, 84(2), 122–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheitle, C. P., & Ecklund, E. H. (2016). Recommending a child enter a STEM career: The role of religion. Journal of Career Development, 44(3), 251–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheitle, C. P., & Ecklund, E. H. (2017). The influence of science popularizers on the public’s view of religion and science: An experimental assessment. Public Understanding of Science, 26(1), 25–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., Corley, E. A., Shih, T. J., Dalrymple, K. E., & Ho, S. S. (2009). Religious beliefs and public attitudes toward nanotechnology in Europe and the United States. Nature Nanotechnology, 4(2), 91–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedikides, C. (2010). Why does religiosity persist? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 3–6. doi: 10.1177/1088868309352323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selman v. Cobb County School District. (2006). No. 05-10341 (11th Cir. May 25, 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Shariff, A. F., Cohen, A. B., & Norenzayan, A. (2008). The devil’s advocate: Secular arguments diminish both implicit and explicit religious belief. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 8(3), 417–423.
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, R. C., Snavely, A. C., De Jesus, M., Othus, M. D., & Allen, J. D. (2013). HPV vaccine decision-making and acceptance: Does religion play a role? Journal of Religion and Health, 52(4), 1120–1130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenhav, A., Rand, D. G., & Greene, J. D. (2012). Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in God. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(3), 423–428. doi: 10.1037/a0025391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherkat, D. E. (2011). Religion and scientific literacy in the United States. Social Science Quarterly, 92(5), 1134–1150. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2011.00811.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shtulman, A., & Calabi, P. (2008). Learning, understanding, and acceptance: the case of evolution. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the thirtieth annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 235–240). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Shtulman, A., & Calabi, P. (2012). Cognitive constraints on the understanding and acceptance of evolution. In K. S. Rosengren, S. K. Brem, E. M. Evans, & G. M. Sinatra (Eds.), Evolution challenges: Integrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution (pp. 47–65). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shtulman, A., & Valcarcel, J. (2012). Scientific knowledge suppresses but does not supplant earlier intuitions. Cognition, 124(2), 209–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subbotsky, E. (2011). The ghost in the machine: Why and how the belief in magic survives in the rational mind. Human Development, 54(3), 126–143. doi: 10.1159/000329129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Texas Education Agency (2015). Proclamations. Retrieved December 31, 2015, from: tea.texas.gov
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, V. A., Turner, J. A. P., & Pennycook, G. (2011). Intuition, reason, and metacognition. Cognitive Psychology, 63(3), 107–140. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobia, K. P. (2016). Does religious belief infect philosophical analysis? Religion, Brain & Behavior, 6(1), 56–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tullett, A. M., Hart, W. P., Feinberg, M., Fetterman, Z. J., & Gottlieb, S. (2016). Is ideology the enemy of inquiry? Examining the link between political orientation and lack of interest in novel data. Journal of Research in Personality, 63, 123–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. (2011) Human life and dignity. Retrieved December 15, 2015, from http://www.usccb.org
   Google Scholar
• Vaden, V. C., & Woolley, J. D. (2011). Does God make It real? Children’s belief in religious stories from the judeo-christian tradition. Child Development, 82(4), 1120–1135. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01589.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Elk, M., Rutjens, B. T., Pligt, J., & Harreveld, F. (2016). Priming of supernatural agent concepts and agency detection. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 6(1), 4–33. doi: 10.1080/2153599X.2014.933444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vess, M., Arndt, J., Cox, C. R., Routledge, C., & Goldenberg, J. L. (2009). Exploring the existential function of religion: The effect of religious fundamentalism and mortality salience on faith-based medical refusals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(2), 334–350. doi: 10.1037/a0015545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilaythong, T., Lindner, N. M., & Nosek, B. A. (2010). “Do unto others”: effects of priming the golden rule on Buddhists’ and Christians’ attitudes toward gay people. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49(3), 494–506. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2010.01524.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willard, A. K., & Norenzayan, A. (2013). Cognitive biases explain religious belief, paranormal belief, and belief in life’s purpose. Cognition, 129(2), 379–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolley, J. D., & Cox, V. (2007). Development of beliefs about storybook reality. Developmental Science, 10(5), 681–693. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00612.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, O., & Bahçekapili, H. G. (2015). When science replaces religion: Science as a secular authority bolsters moral sensitivity. PloS one, 10(9), e0137499. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, M., Silberman, J., & Hall, J. A. (2013). The relation between intelligence and religiosity a meta-analysis and some proposed explanations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1088868313497266. doi: 10.1177/1088868313497266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, P. (2007). Atheism: Contemporary numbers and patterns. In M. Martin (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to atheism. Cambridge companions to philosophy. (pp. 47–65). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. http://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521842700.004
   Google Scholar