Death Anxiety and Religious Belief: responses to commentaries

References

• Atran, S. (2002). In gods we trust: The evolutionary landscape of religion. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, L. F. (2017). The theory of constructed emotion: An active inference account of interoception and categorization. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12, 1–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, L. F., & Russell, J. A. (Eds.). (2014). The psychological construction of emotion. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, E. (1973). The denial of death. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Bullivant, S., & Ruse, M. (Eds.). (2013). The Oxford handbook of atheism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, W. A., Preacher, K. J., & Banaji, M. R. (2001). Implicit attitude measures: Consistency, stability, and convergent validity. Psychological Science, 12, 163–170. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J., Teige-Mocigemba, S., Spruyt, A., & Moors, A. (2009). Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 347–368. doi: 10.1037/a0014211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., & Gaertner, S. L. (2002). Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 62–68. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., Johnson, C., Johnson, B., & Howard, A. (1997). On the nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 510–540. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1997.1331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. H. (2007). Attitudes as object–evaluation associations of varying strength. Social Cognition, 25, 603–637. doi: 10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feifel, H. (1974). Religious conviction and fear of death among the healthy and the terminally ill. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 13, 353–360. doi: 10.2307/1384763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiedler, K., & Bluemke, M. (2005). Faking the IAT: Aided and unaided response control on the Implicit Association Tests. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 307–316. doi: 10.1207/s15324834basp2704_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiedler, K., Messner, C., & Bluemke, M. (2006). Unresolved problems with the “I”, the “A”, and the “T”: A logical and psychometric critique of the Implicit Association Test (IAT). European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 74–147. doi: 10.1080/10463280600681248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B. (2002). What does the implicit association test measure? A test of the convergent and discriminant validity of prejudice-related IATs. Experimental Psychology, 49, 171–180. doi: 10.1026//1618-3169.49.3.171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692–731. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, A., & Lundsgaarde, E. (2004). State welfare spending and religiosity: A cross-national analysis. Rationality and Society, 16, 399–436. doi: 10.1177/1043463104046694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goranson, A., Ritter, R. S., Waytz, A., Norton, M. I., & Gray, K. (2017). Dying is unexpectedly positive. Psychological Science, 28, 988–999. doi: 10.1177/0956797617701186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (1986). The causes and consequences of a need for self-esteem: A terror management theory. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Public self and private self (pp. 189–212). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17–41. doi: 10.1037/a0015575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groth-Marnat, G., & Summers, R. (1998). Altered beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors following near-death experiences. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 38, 110–125. doi: 10.1177/00221678980383005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, S., Qin, J., & Ma, Y. (2010). Neurocognitive processes of linguistic cues related to death. Neuropsychologia, 48, 3436–3442. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.07.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmon-Jones, E., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., & Simon, L. (1996). The effects of mortality salience on intergroup bias between minimal groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 677–681. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199607)26:4<677::AID-EJSP777>3.0.CO;2-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, J., Schimel, J., Arndt, J., & Faucher, E. H. (2010). A theoretical and empirical review of the death-thought accessibility concept in terror management research. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 699–739. doi: 10.1037/a0020524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwendner, T., Le, H., & Schmitt, M. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1369–1385. doi: 10.1177/0146167205275613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jong, J. (2014). Ernest Becker’s psychology of religion forty years on: A view from social cognitive psychology. Zygon, 49, 875–889. doi: 10.1111/zygo.12127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jong, J. (2017). “Belief in spiritual beings": E. B. Tylor’s (primitive) cognitive theory of religion. In P-F. Tremlett, G. Harvey, & L. T. Sutherland (Eds.), Edward Burnett Tylor, Religion and Culture (pp. 47–61). London, UK: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Jong, J., & Halberstadt, J. (2016). Death anxiety and religious belief: An existential psychology of religion. London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jong, J., Halberstadt, J., & Bluemke, M. (2012). Foxhole atheism, revisited: The effects of mortality salience on explicit and implicit religious belief. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 983–989.
   Google Scholar
• Jong, J., Zahl, B. P., & Sharp, C. A. (2017). Indirect and implicit measures of religiosity. In Faithful Measures: New Methods in the Measurement of Religion (pp. 78–107). New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klackl, J., Jonas, E., & Kronbichler, M. (2014). Existential neuroscience: self-esteem moderates neuronal responses to mortality-related stimuli. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9, 1754–1761. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman, M. D., & Cunningham, W. A. (2009). Type I and Type II error concerns in fMRI research: Re-balancing the scale. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4, 423–428. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsp052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lifshin, U., Greenberg, J., Soenke, M., Darrell, A., & Pyszczynski, T. (2017). Mortality salience, religiosity, and indefinite life extension: Evidence of a reciprocal relationship between afterlife beliefs and support for forestalling death. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 8(1), 31–43. doi: 10.1080/2153599X.2016.1238841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindeman, M., Svedholm-Häkkinen, A. M., & Lipsanen, J. (2015). Ontological confusions but not mentalizing abilities predict religious belief, paranormal belief, and belief in supernatural purpose. Cognition, 134, 63–76. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norenzayan, A., & Hansen, I. G. (2006). Belief in supernatural agents in the face of death. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 174–187. doi: 10.1177/0146167205280251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2004). Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., & Smyth, F. L. (2007). A multitrait-multimethod validation of the implicit association test. Experimental Psychology, 54, 14–29. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.54.1.14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., & DeMarree, K. G. (2007). The Meta–Cognitive Model (MCM) of attitudes: Implications for attitude measurement, change, and strength. Social Cognition, 25, 657–686. doi: 10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., & Solomon, S. (1999). A dual-process model of defense against conscious and unconscious death-related thoughts: An extension of terror management theory. Psychological Review, 106, 835–845. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quirin, M., Loktyushin, A., Arndt, J., Küstermann, E., Lo, Y. Y., Kuhl, J., & Eggert, L. (2012). Existential neuroscience: A functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of neural responses to reminders of one’s mortality. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7, 193–198. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsq106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russac, R. J., Gatliff, C., Reece, M., & Spottswood, D. (2007). Death anxiety across the adult years: An examination of age and gender effects. Death studies, 31, 549–561. doi: 10.1080/07481180701356936
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, Z., & Han, S. (2013). Transient and sustained neural responses to death-related linguistic cues. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8, 573–578. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (2015). The worm at the core: On the role of death in life. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Vail, K. E., Arndt, J., & Abdollahi, A. (2012). Exploring the existential function of religion and supernatural agent beliefs among Christians, Muslims, Atheists, and Agnostics. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1288–1300. doi: 10.1177/0146167212449361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vail, K. E., Rothschild, Z. K., Weise, D. R., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., & Greenberg, J. (2010). A terror management analysis of the psychological functions of religion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 84–94. doi: 10.1177/1088868309351165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Elk, M. T., Rutjens, B., & van Harreveld, F. (2017). Why are Protestants more prosocial than Catholics? A comparative study among orthodox Dutch believers. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 27, 65–81. doi: 10.1080/10508619.2017.1245023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Lommel, P., van Wees, R., Meyers, V., & Elfferich, I. (2001). Near-death experience in survivors of cardiac arrest: A prospective study in the Netherlands. The Lancet, 358, 2039–2045. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)07100-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber, D., Schimel, J., Faucher, E. H., Hayes, J., Zhang, R., & Martens, A. (2015). Emotion as a necessary component of threat-induced death thought accessibility and defensive compensation. Motivation and Emotion, 39, 142–155. doi: 10.1007/s11031-014-9426-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar