Reasoning about nature’s agency and design in the cultural context of China

References

• Anderson, D. L., Fisher, K. M., & Norman, G. J. (2002). Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 952–978. doi: 10.1002/tea.10053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, K., & Bloom, P. (2014). Why did this happen to me? Religious believers’ and non-believers’ teleological reasoning about life events. Cognition, 133(1), 277–303. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.06.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, J. L. (2004). Why would anyone believe in God? Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, J. L. (2012). Born believers: The science of children’s religious belief. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, P. (2007). Religion is natural. Developmental Science, 10(1), 147–151. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00577.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, P. (2003). Religious thought and behaviour as by-products of brain function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 119–124. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00031-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadge, W., Levitt, P., & Smilde, D. (2011). De-centering and re-centering: Rethinking concepts and methods in the sociological study of religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 50(3), 437–449. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2011.01585.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clément, P. (2015). Creationism, science and religion: A survey of teachers’ conceptions in 30 countries. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 167, 279–287. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.675
   Google Scholar
• Eidson, R. C., & Coley, J. D. (2014). Not so fast: Reassessing gender essentialism in young adults. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15(2), 382–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, E. M. (2001). Cognitive and contextual factors in the emergence of diverse belief systems: Creation versus evolution. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 217–266. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. St. B. T., & Curtis-Holmes, J. (2005). Rapid responding increases belief bias: Evidence for the dual-process theory of reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 11(4), 382–389. doi: 10.1080/13546780542000005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. St. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241. doi: 10.1177/1745691612460685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farha, M. (2012). Global gradations of secularism: The consociational, communal and coercive paradigms. Comparative Sociology, 11, 354–386. doi: 10.1163/156913312X638598
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, R. F., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2009). Developmental “roots” in mature biological knowledge. Psychological Science, 20(4), 480–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gries, P., Su, J., & Schak, D. (2012). Toward the scientific study of polytheism: Beyond forced-choice measures of religious belief. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 51(4), 623–637. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2012.01683.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grumbine, R. E., & Xu, J. (2011). Creating a “conservation with Chinese characteristics”. Biological Conservation, 144, 1347–1355. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, P. (2006). “Science” and “religion”: Constructing the boundaries. The Journal of Religion, 86(1), 81–106. doi: 10.1086/497085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzyan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2/3). doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heywood, B. T., & Bering, J. M. (2014). “Meant to be”: How religious beliefs and cultural religiosity affect the implicit bias to think teleologically. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 4(3), 183–201. doi: 10.1080/2153599X.2013.782888
   Google Scholar
• Hill, J. (2014a). National study of religion and human origins. BioLogos. Retrieved from https://biologos.org/uploads/projects/nsrho-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hill, J. (2014b). Rejecting evolution: The role of religion, education, and social networks. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 53(3), 575–594. doi: 10.1111/jssr.12127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homola, S. (2013). Pursue good fortune and avoid calamity: The practice and status of divination in contemporary Taiwan. Journal of Chinese Religions, 41(2), 124–147. doi: 10.1179/0737769X13Z.0000000005
   Google Scholar
• Hood, B. M. (2009). Supersense: Why we believe in the unbelievable. New York: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, A. (2016). Ancestor worship in contemporary China: An empirical investigation. China Review, 16(1), 169–186.
   Google Scholar
• Järnefelt, E. (2013). Created by some being: Theoretical and empirical exploration of adults’ automatic and reflective beliefs about the origin of natural phenomena. Doctoral thesis. Department of World Cultures, University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Järnefelt, E., Canfield, C. F., & Kelemen, D. (2015). The divided mind of a disbeliever: Intuitive beliefs about nature as purposefully created among different groups of non-religious adults. Cognition, 140, 72–88. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joreskog, K. (1978). Structural analysis of covariance and correlation matrices. Psychometrika, 43(4), 443–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. Straus and Giroux: Farrar.
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D. (1999a). The scope of teleological thinking in preschool children. Cognition, 70, 241–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D. (1999b). Why are rocks pointy?: Children’s preference for teleological explanations of the natural world. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1440–1452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D. (2004). Are children “intuitive theists”?. Reasoning about purpose and design in nature. Psychological Science, 15(5), 295–301. doi:10.1111/j.0956- 7976.2004.00672.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D., & Carey, S. (2007). The essence of artifacts: Developing the design stance. In S. Laurence & E. Margolis (Eds.), Creations of the mind: Theories of artifacts and their representation (pp. 212–230). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D., & DiYanni, C. (2005). Intuitions about origins: Purpose and intelligent design in children’s reasoning about nature. Journal of Cognition and Development, 6, 3–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D., & Rosset, E. (2009). The human function compunction: Teleological explanation in adults. Cognition, 111(1), 138–143. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D., Rottman, J., & Seston, R. (2013). Professional physical scientists display tenacious teleological tendencies: Purpose-based reasoning as a cognitive default. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(4), 1074–1083. doi:10.1037/ a0030399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legare, C., Zhu, L., & Wellman, H. M. (2013). Examining biological explanations in Chinese preschool children: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 13, 67–93. doi: 10.1163/15685373-12342085
   Google Scholar
• Liénard, P. (2006). The making of peculiar artifacts: Living kind, artifact and social order in the Turkana sacrifice. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 6(3-4), 343–373. doi: 10.1163/156853706778554940
   Google Scholar
• Lombrozo, T., & Carey, S. (2006). Functional explanation and the function of explanation. Cognition, 99(2), 167–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeal, R. (2012). Constructing myth in modern China. The Journal of Asian Studies, 71(3), 679–704. doi: 10.1017/S0021911812000630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. D., Scott, E. C., & Okamoto, S. (2006). Science communication: Public acceptance of evolution. Science, 313, 765–766. doi: 10.1126/science.1126746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867–872. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paper, J. (2008). Chinese traditional concepts of nature. In B. R. Taylor (Ed.), The encyclopedia of religion and nature (pp. 294–299). New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Paton, M. J. (2007). Fengshui: A continuation of “art of swindlers”? Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 34(3), 427–445. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6253.2007.00427.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2013). Public’s views on human evolution. Retrieved from http://www.pewforum.org/files/2013/12/Evolution-12-30.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pyysiäinen, I. (2012). Putting cognition and culture back together again: Religion in mind and society. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 24, 29–50. doi: 10.1163/157006811X609150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, M. J., & Newton, E. J. (2001). Inspection times, the change task, and the rapid-response selection task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 54(4), 1031–1048. doi: 10.1080/02724980143000082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosset, E. (2008). It’s no accident: Our bias for intentional explanations. Cognition, 108, 771–780. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008. 07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rottman, J., Zhu, L., Wang, W., Schillaci, R. S., Clark, K., & Kelemen, D. (2017). Cultural influences on the teleological stance: Evidence from China. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 7, 17–26. doi: 10.1080/2153599X.2015.1118402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schachner, A., Zhu, L., Li, J., & Kelemen, D. (2017). Is the bias for function-based explanations culturally universal? Children from China endorse teleological explanations of natural phenomena. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 157, 29–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebestény, A., & Emmons, N. (2017). Balinese Hindus’ afterlife beliefs as stable constructs: An effect of high frequency domestic rituals. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 5, 437–462. doi: 10.1163/15685373-12340013
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, J. (2001). Mao’s war against nature: Politics and the environment in revolutionary China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slingerland, E. (2008). What science offers the humanities: Integrating body & culture. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slingerland, E. (2013). Body and mind in early China: An integrated humanities-science approach. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 81(1), 6–55. doi: 10.1093/jaarel/lfs094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slingerland, E., & Collard, M. ( Eds.). (2012). Creating consilience: Integrating the sciences and the humanities. New Directions in Cognitive Science series. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sosis, R., & Kiper, J. (2014). Religion is more than belief: What evolutionary theories of religion tell us about religious commitments. In M. Bergmann, & P. Kain (Eds.), Challenges to religion and morality: Disagreements and evolution (pp. 256–276). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2001. Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Thoraval, J. (1996). The western misconception of Chinese religion: A Hong Kong example. China Perspectives, 3, 58–65.
   Google Scholar
• Wenfang, T. (2014). The worshipping atheist: Institutional and diffused religiosities in China. China: An International Journal, 12(3), 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willard, A., & Norenzayan, A. (2017). “Spiritual but not religious”: Cognition, schizotypy, and conversion in alternative beliefs. Cognition, 165, 137–146. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WIN-Gallup International. (2012). Global index of religiosity and atheism. Retrieved from http://www.wingia.com/web/files/news/14/file/14.pdf
   Google Scholar
• WIN-Gallup International. (2015). Losing our religion? Two thirds of people still claim to be religious. Retrieved from http://www.wingia.com/web/files/news/290/file/290.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wolpert, L. (2006). Six impossible things before breakfast. The evolutionary origins of belief. London: Faber and Faber Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, W. Y. (2011). Defining Chinese folk religion: A methodological interpretation. Asian Philosophy, 21(2), 153–170. doi: 10.1080/09552367.2011.563993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, F., & Hu, A. (2012). Mapping Chinese folk religion in mainland China and Taiwan. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 51(3), 505–521. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2012.01660.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh, K. H., Yi, C. C., Tsao, W. C., & Wan, P. S. (2013). Filial piety in contemporary Chinese societies: A comparative study of Taiwan, Hong Kong, and China. International Sociology, 28(3), 277–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar