References
- Andersen, M. M. (2017a). Predictive coding in agency detection. Religion, Brain and Behavior. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/2153599X.2017.1387170
- Andersen, M. M. (2017b). The Baysian observer and supernatural agents. Religion, Brain and Behavior. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/2153599X.2017.1387597
- Andersen, M., Pfeiffer, T., Müller, S., & Schjoedt, U. (2017). Agency detection in predictive minds: A virtual reality study. Religion, Brain & Behavior. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/2153599X.2017.1378709
- Andersen, M., Schjoedt, U., Nielbo, K. L., & Sørensen, J. (2014). Mystical experience in the lab. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, 26(3), 217–245. doi: 10.1163/15700682-12341323
- Bader, C. D., Mencken, F. C., & Baker, J. O. (2017). Paranormal America: Ghost encounters, UFO sightings, bigfoot hunts, and other curiosities in religion and culture. New York: New York University Press.
- Barrett, J. L., & Keil, F. C. (1996). Conceptualizing a nonnatural entity: Anthropomorphism in God concepts. Cognitive Psychology, 31(3), 219–247. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1996.0017
- Epley, N., Converse, B. A., Delbosc, A., Monteleone, G. A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2009). Believers’ estimates of God’s beliefs are more egocentric than estimates of other people’s beliefs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(51), 21533–21538. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908374106
- Gervais, W. M. (2013). Perceiving minds and gods: How mind perception enables, constrains, and is triggered by belief in gods. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(4), 380–394. doi: 10.1177/1745691613489836
- Krueger, J., & Clement, R. W. (1994). The truly false consensus effect: An ineradicable and egocentric bias in social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 596–610. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.596
- Maij, D. L., & van Elk, M. (in preparation). Threat-induced agency detection in a virtual reality environment.
- Maij, D. L., van Schie, H. T., & van Elk, M. (2017). The boundary conditions of the hypersensitive agency detection device: An empirical investigation of agency detection in threatening situations. Religion, Brain & Behavior. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/2153599X.2017.1362662
- Riekki, T., Lindeman, M., Aleneff, M., Halme, A., & Nuortimo, A. (2013). Paranormal and religious believers are more prone to illusory face perception than skeptics and non-believers. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 150–155. doi: 10.1002/acp.2874
- Riekki, T., Lindeman, M., & Raij, T. T. (2014). Supernatural believers attribute more intentions to random movement than skeptics: An fMRI study. Social Neuroscience, 9(4), 400–411. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2014.906366
- van Elk, M. (2013). Paranormal believers are more prone to illusory agency detection than skeptics. Consciousness and Cognition, 22, 1041–1046. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.07.004
- van Elk, M., & Allen, P. (2015). Perceptual biases in relation to paranormal and conspiracy beliefs. PLoS One, 10(6), e0130422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130422
- van Elk, M., Rutjens, B. T., van der Pligt, J., & van Harreveld, F. (2016). Priming of supernatural agent concepts and agency detection. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 6(1), 4–33. doi: 10.1080/2153599X.2014.933444