A national-scale typology of orientations to religion poses new challenges for the cultural evolutionary study of religious groups

References

• Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addision-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5(4), 432–443. doi: 10.1037/h0021212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 113–133. doi: 10.1207/s15327582ijpr0202_5
   Google Scholar
• Bainbridge, W. S., & Stark, R. (1980). Client and audience cults in America. Sociology of Religion, 41(3), 199–214. doi: 10.2307/3710398
   Google Scholar
• Batson, C. D., Daniel Batson, C., & Schoenrade, P. A. (1991). Quest scale. PsycTESTS Dataset. doi: 10.1037/t04434-000
   Google Scholar
• Batson, C. D., Schoenrade, P., & Ventis, W. L. (1993). Religion and the individual: A social-psychological perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Batson, C. D., & Schoenrade, P. A. (1991). Measuring religion as quest: 1) Validity concerns. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 30, 416–429. doi: 10.2307/1387277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulbulia, J., Geertz, A. W., Atkinson, Q. D., Cohen, E., Evans, N., Francois, P., Gintis, H., … Wilson, D. S. (2013). The cultural evolution of religion. In P. J. Richerson & M. Christiansen (Eds.), Cultural evolution (pp. 381–404). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bulbulia, J., Osborne, D., & Sibley, C. G. (2013). Moral foundations predict religious orientations in New Zealand. PLoS One, 8(12), e80224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulbulia, J. A., Shaver, J., Greaves, L., Sosis, R., & Sibley, C. G. (2015). Religion and parental cooperation: An empirical test of Slone’s sexual signaling model. In D. J. Slone & J. Van Slyke (Eds.), The attraction of religion: A sexual selectionist account (pp. 29–62). New York, NY: Bloomsbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dittes, J. E. (1971). Typing the typologies: Some parallels in the career of church-sect and extrinsic-intrinsic. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 10(4), 375–383. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1384784 doi: 10.2307/1384784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eister, A. W. (1973). H. Richard Niebuhr and the paradox of religious organizations: a radical critique. In C. Y. Glock & P. E. Hammond (Eds.), Beyond the classics? Essays in the social scientific study of religion (pp. 355–408). New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Gervais, W. M., Willard, A., Norenzayan, A., & Henrich, J. (2011). The cultural transmission of faith: Why innate intuitions are necessary, but insufficient to explain religious belief. Religion, 41(3), 389–410. doi: 10.1080/0048721X.2011.604510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorsuch, R. L., & McPherson, S. E. (1989). Intrinsic/extrinsic measurement: I/E-revised and single-item scales. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28(3), 348–354. doi: 10.2307/1386745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, R. W., Hill, P. C., & Spilka, B. (2009). The psychology of religion: An empirical approach (4th ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoverd, W. J., Bulbulia, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2013). Does poverty predict religion? Religion, Brain & Behavior, 3(3), 185–200. doi: 10.1080/2153599X.2012.762937
   Google Scholar
• Hoverd, W. J., & Sibley, C. G. (2010). Religious and denominational diversity in New Zealand 2009. New Zealand Sociology, 25(2), 59–87.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. (1963). On church and sect. American Sociological Review, 28, 539–549. doi: 10.2307/2090070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. D. P. (2005). God’s punishment and public goods. Human Nature, 16(4), 410–446. doi: 10.1007/s12110-005-1017-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, Y., Mendell, N. R., & Rubin, D. B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88(3), 767–778. doi: 10.1093/biomet/88.3.767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, L. J. (2012). The recognition signal hypothesis for the adaptive evolution of religion. Human Nature, 23(2), 218–249. doi: 10.1007/s12110-012-9138-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niebuhr, H. R. (1957). The social sources of denominationalism. New York: Meridian Books.
   Google Scholar
• Norenzayan, A., Shariff, A. F., Gervais, W. M., Willard, A. K., McNamara, R. A., Slingerland, E., & Henrich, J. (2016). The cultural evolution of prosocial religions. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, e1. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X14001356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., & Sibley, C. G. (2017). Identifying “types” of ideologies and intergroup biases: Advancing a person-centred approach to social psychology. European Review of Social Psychology, 28(1), 288–332. doi: 10.1080/10463283.2017.1379265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, M. R., Bravo, A. J., Conner, B. T., & Marijuana Outcomes Study Team. (2016). Distinguishing subpopulations of marijuana users with latent profile analysis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 172, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.10.043
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2018). The religious typology. A new way to categorize Americans by religion. Retrieved from https://www.pewforum.org/2018/08/29/the-religious-typology/
   Google Scholar
• Salmond, C. E., Crampton, P., & Atkinson, J. (2007). NZDep2006 index of deprivation. Wellington: Department of Public Health, University of Otago.
   Google Scholar
• Shaver, J. H., Troughton, G., Sibley, C. G., & Bulbulia, J. A. (2016). Religion and the unmaking of prejudice toward Muslims: Evidence from a large national sample. PLoS One, 11(3), e0150209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibley, C. G., & Bulbulia, J. A. (2014). How do religious identities and basic value orientations affect each other over time? The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 24(1), 64–76. doi:10.1080/10508619.2013.771600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, R., & Bainbridge, W. S. (1979). Of churches, sects, and cults: Preliminary concepts for a theory of religious movements. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 18, 117–131. doi: 10.2307/1385935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, R., & Bainbridge, W. S. (1985). The future of religion: Secularization, revival and cult formation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Troeltsch, E. (1992). The social teaching of the Christian churches. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press.
   Google Scholar
• Troughton, G., Bulbulia, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2014). Strength of religion and the future of the churches. Stimulus, 21(2), 27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Villalobos-Gallegos, L., Marín-Navarrete, R., Roncero, C., & González-Cantú, H. (2017). Latent class profile of psychiatric symptoms and treatment utilization in a sample of patients with co-occurring disorders. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, 39(4), 286–292. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2016-1972
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, J., Greenhill, S. J., Atkinson, Q. D., Currie, T. E., Bulbulia, J., & Gray, R. D. (2015). Broad supernatural punishment but not moralizing high gods precede the evolution of political complexity in Austronesia. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282(1804), 20142556, doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.2556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1993). The sociology of religion. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. S., Hartberg, Y., MacDonald, I., Lanman, J. A., & Whitehouse, H. (2017). The nature of religious diversity: A cultural ecosystem approach. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 7(2), 134–153. doi: 10.1080/2153599X.2015.1132243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. S., Bulbulia, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2014). Differences and similarities in religious and paranormal beliefs: A typology of distinct faith signatures. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 4(2), 104–126. doi: 10.1080/2153599X.2013.779934
   Google Scholar
• de Zavala, A. G., Cichocka, A., Eidelson, R., & Jayawickreme, N. (2009). Collective narcissism and its social consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1074–1096. doi: 10.1037/a0016904
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar