Faith and fertility in evolutionary perspective

References

• Alcorta, C. S., & Sosis, R. (2005). Ritual, emotion, and sacred symbols: The evolution of religion as an adaptive complex. Human Nature, 16(4), 323–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-005-1014-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, A. V., Hinde, K., & Newson, L. (2013). Who was helping? The scope for female cooperative breeding in early homo. PloS One, 8(12), e83667. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Porath, Y. (1973). Economic analysis of fertility in Israel: Point and counterpoint. Journal of Political Economy, 81(2), S202–S233. https://doi.org/10.1086/260162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulbulia, J. (2004). Religious costs as adaptations that signal altruistic intention. Evolution and Cognition, 10(1), 19–38.
   Google Scholar
• Colleran, H. (2020). Market integration reduces kin density in women’s ego-networks in rural Poland. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14158-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coontz, S. (1993). The way we never were: American families and the nostalgia trap (reprint edition). Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Creighton, C. (1996). The rise of the male breadwinner family: A reappraisal. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 38(2), 310–337. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500020296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durkheim, É. (1915). The elementary forms of religious life. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ebenstein, A., Hazan, M., & Simhon, A. (2016). Changing the cost of children and fertility: Evidence from the Israeli kibbutz. The Economic Journal, 126(597), 2038–2063. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmott, E. H., & Mace, R. (2021). Why the son-bias in caregiving? Testing sex-differences in the associations between paternal caregiving and child outcomes in England. Journal of Family Issues, 42(6), 1354–1383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X20941902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frejka, T., & Westoff, C. F. (2008). Religion, religiousness and fertility in the US and in Europe. European Journal of Population / Revue Européenne de Démographie, 24(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-007-9121-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galdikas, B. M. F., & Wood, J. W. (1990). Birth spacing patterns in humans and apes. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 83(2), 185–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330830207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geary, David C. (2000). Evolution and the proximate expression of human paternal investment. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 55–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, B. G., Workman, J., & Downey, D. B. (2016). The (conditional) resource dilution model: State-and community-level modifications. Demography, 53(3), 723–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-016-0471-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, M. A., & Lawson, D. W. (2011). “Modernization” increases parental investment and sibling resource competition: Evidence from a rural development initiative in Ethiopia. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32(2), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, A., Koupil, I., & Lawson, D. W. (2012). Low fertility increases descendant socioeconomic position but reduces long-term fitness in a modern post-industrial society. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279(1746), 4342–4351. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.1415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan, A., Lawson, D., Schaffnit, S., Urassa, M., Sear, Rebecca. (In preparation). Childcare in transition: Evidence that patterns of childcare differ by degree of market integration in north-western Tanzania.
   Google Scholar
• Hewlett, B. S. (1991). Demography and childcare in preindustrial societies. Journal of Anthropological Research, 47(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1086/jar.47.1.3630579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewlett, B. S. (2004). Fathers in forager, farmer, and pastoral cultures.
   Google Scholar
• Hrdy, S. B. (2005). Cooperative breeders. Grandmotherhood: The evolutionary significance of the second half of female life, 295.
   Google Scholar
• Hrdy, S. B. (2011). Mothers and others. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Irons, W. (2001). Religion as a hard-to-fake sign of commitment. In R. Nesse (Ed.), Evolution and the capacity for commitment (pp. 292–309). Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, P. (2020). Fertility and faith: The demographic revolution and the transformation of world religions. Baylor University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, H. (1996). A theory of fertility and parental investment in traditional and modern human societies. American Journal of Physical Anthropology: The Official Publication of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists, 101(S23), 91–135. http://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(1996)23+%3C91::AID-AJPA4%3E3.0.CO;2-C
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, K. L. (2010). Cooperative breeding and its significance to the demographic success of humans. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39(1), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.105054
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, K. L. (2019). How there got to be so many of us: The evolutionary story of population growth and a life history of cooperation. Journal of Anthropological Research, 75(4), 472–497. https://doi.org/10.1086/705943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzawa, C. W., & Bragg, J. M. (2012). Plasticity in human life History strategy: Implications for contemporary human variation and the evolution of genus homo. Current Anthropology, 53(S6), S369–S382. https://doi.org/10.1086/667410
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, D. W. (2009). The behavioural ecology of modern families: A longitudinal study of parental investment and child development. UCL (University College London).
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, D. W., & Mace, R. (2008). Sibling configuration and childhood growth in contemporary British families. International Journal of Epidemiology, 37(6), 1408–1421. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyn116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, D. W., & Mace, R. (2009). Trade-offs in modern parenting: A longitudinal study of sibling competition for parental care. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(3), 170–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, R. F. (2016). Parents face quantity–quality trade-offs between reproduction and investment in offspring in Iceland. Royal Society Open Science, 3(5), 160087. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, R. F., Schaffnit, S., Sear, R., Sosis, R., Shaver, J., Alam, N., Blumenfield, T., Mattison, S., & Shenk, M. (In preparation). Religiosity increases the size and number of kin, but not non-kin, in one’s social network in a country undergoing rapid market integration.
   Google Scholar
• Marlowe, F. (2001). Male contribution to diet and female reproductive success among foragers. Current Anthropology, 42(5), 755–760. https://doi.org/10.1086/323820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlowe, F. W. (2003). A critical period for provisioning by Hadza men: Implications for pair bonding. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24(3), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(03)00014-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlowe, F. W. (2007). Hunting and gathering: The human sexual division of foraging labor. Cross-Cultural Research, 41(2), 170–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397106297529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meehan, C. L. (2005). The effects of residential locality on parental and alloparental investment among the Aka foragers of the Central African Republic. Human Nature, 16(1), 58–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-005-1007-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. G. (2020). Beyond the household: Caribbean families and biocultural models of alloparenting. Annual Review of Anthropology, 49(1), 355–372. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011140
   Google Scholar
• Nettle, D. (2008). Why do some dads get more involved than others? Evidence from a large British cohort. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(6), 416–423.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newson, L., Postmes, T., Lea, S. G., & Webley, P. (2005). Why are modern families small? Toward an evolutionary and cultural explanation for the demographic transition. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(4), 360–375. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0904_5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, E. A. (2018). Collective ritual and social support networks in rural South India. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 285(1879), 20180023. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.0023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scelza, B. A. (2010). Fathers’ presence speeds the social and reproductive careers of sons. Current Anthropology, 51(2), 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1086/651051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sear, R. (2015). Evolutionary contributions to the study of human fertility. Population Studies, 69(sup1), S39–S55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2014.982905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sear, R. (2021). The male breadwinner nuclear family is not the ‘traditional’ human family, and promotion of this myth may have adverse health consequences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 376(1827), 20200020. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sear, R., & Coall, D. (2011). How much does family matter? Cooperative breeding and the demographic transition. Population and Development Review, 37, 81–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00379.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sear, R., Lawson, D. W., Kaplan, H., & Shenk, M. K. (2016). Understanding variation in human fertility: What can we learn from evolutionary demography? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371(1692), 20150144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sear, R., & Mace, R. (2008). Who keeps children alive? A review of the effects of kin on child survival. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaver, J. H. (2017). Why and how do religious individuals, and some religious groups, achieve higher relative fertility? Religion, Brain & Behavior, 7(4), 324–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2016.1249920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaver, J. H., Power, E. A., Purzycki, B. G., Watts, J., Sear, R., Shenk, M. K., Sosis, R., & Bulbulia, J. A. (2020). Church attendance and alloparenting: An analysis of fertility, social support and child development among English mothers. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 375(1805), 20190428. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaver, J. H., Sibley, C. G., Sosis, R., Galbraith, D., & Bulbulia, J. (2019). Alloparenting and religious fertility: A test of the religious alloparenting hypothesis. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40(3), 315–324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2019.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenk, M., & Scelza, B. (2012). Paternal investment and status-related child outcomes: Timing of father’s death affects offspring success. Journal of Biosocial Science, 44(5), 549–569. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932012000053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosis, R., & Ruffle, B. J. (2003). Religious ritual and cooperation: Testing for a relationship on Israeli religious and secular kibbutzim. Current Anthropology, 44(5), 713–722. https://doi.org/10.1086/379260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spake, L., Schaffnit, S. B., Sear, R., Shenk, M. K., Sosis, R., & Shaver, J. H. (2021). Mother’s partnership status and allomothering networks in the United Kingdom and United States. Social Sciences, 10(5), 182. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10050182
   Google Scholar
• Spake, L., Watts, J., Hassan, A., Schaffnit, S., Lynch, R., Sosis, R., Sear, R., Shenk, M., & Shaver, J. H. (in preparation). Kin orientation in religious and non-religious women: A potential pathway to explain increased fertility of religious groups in low-fertility societies.
   Google Scholar
• Stack, C. B. (1983). All our kin: Strategies for survival in a black community (60837th edition). Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ukwatta, S. (2010). Sri Lankan female domestic workers overseas: Mothering their children from a distance. Journal of Population Research, 27(2), 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12546-010-9035-0
   Google Scholar
• Walker, R. S., Gurven, M., Burger, O., & Hamilton, M. J. (2008). The trade-off between number and size of offspring in humans and other primates. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275(1636), 827–834. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.1511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelinsky, W. (1971). The hypothesis of the mobility transition. Geographical Review, 61(2), 219–249. https://doi.org/10.2307/213996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar