340
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

Introducing the Many-Analysts Religion Project

, , &

References

  • Atkinson, Q. D., Claessens, S., Fischer, K., Forsyth, G. L., Kyritsis, T., Wiebels, K., & Moreau, D. (2022). Being specific about generalisability. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 284–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070251
  • Bastiaansen, J. A., Kunkels, Y. K., Blaauw, F. J., Boker, S. M., Ceulemans, E., Chen, M., Chow, S.-M., de Jonge, P., Emerencia, A. C., Epskamp, S., Fisher, A. J., Hamaker, E. L., Kuppens, P., Lutz, W., Meyer, M. J., Moulder, R., Oravecz, Z., Riese, H., Rubel, J., … Bringmann, L. F. (2020). Time to get personal? The impact of researchers choices on the selection of treatment targets using the experience sampling methodology. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 137, 110211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110211
  • Botvinik-Nezer, R., Holzmeister, F., Camerer, C. F., Dreber, A., Huber, J., Johannesson, M., Kirchler, M., Iwanir, R., Mumford, J. A., Adcock, R. A., Avesani, P., Baczkowski, B. M., Bajracharya, A., Bakst, L., Ball, S., Barilari, M., Bault, N., Beaton, D., Beitner, J., … Schonberg, T. (2020). Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams. Nature, 582(7810), 84–88. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2314-9
  • Bulbulia, J. A. (2022). A workflow for causal inference in cross-cultural psychology. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070245
  • Fischer, R., & Karl, J. A. (2019). A primer to (cross-cultural) multi-group invariance testing possibilities in R. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01507
  • Hoogeveen, S., Sarafoglou, A., Aczel, B., Aditya, Y., Alayan, A., Allen, P., Altay, S., Alzahawi, S., Amir, Y., Anthony, F.-V., Appiah, O., Atkinson, Q. D., Baimel, A., Balkaya-Ince, M., Balsamo, M., Banker, S., Bartoš, F., Becerra, M., Beffara, B., … Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2022). A many-analysts approach to the relation between religiosity and well-being. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 237–283. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/pbfye
  • Hoogeveen, S., Sarafoglou, A., van Elk, M., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2022). Many-Analysts Religion Project: Reflection and conclusion. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 356–363.
  • Hoogeveen, S., & van Elk, M. (2021). Advancing the cognitive science of religion through replication and open science. Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion, 6, 158–190. https://doi.org/10.1558/jcsr.39039
  • Hussey, I., & Hughes, S. (2020). Hidden invalidity among 15 commonly used measures in social and personality psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 166–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919882903
  • Pearl, J. (1995). Causal diagrams for empirical research. Biometrika, 82(4), 669–688. doi:10.1093/biomet/82.4.669
  • Rohrer, J. M. (2018). Thinking clearly about correlations and causation: Graphical causal models for observational data. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917745629
  • Ross, R. M., Sulik, J., Buczny, J., & Schivinski, B. (2022). Many analysts and few incentives. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070248
  • Schreiner, M. R., Mercier, B., Frick, S., Wiwad, D., Schmitt, M. C., Kelly, J. M., & Quevedo Pütter, J. (2022). Measurement issues in the Many Analysts Religion Project. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 339–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070260
  • Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahnik, Š, Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., Carlsson, R., Cheung, F., Christensen, G., Clay, R., Craig, M. A., Dalla Rosa, A., Dam, L., Evans, M. H., Flores Cervantes, I., … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many analysts, one data set Making transparent how variations in analytic choices affect results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646
  • van Lissa, C. J. (2022). Complementing preregistered confirmatory analyses with rigorous, reproducible exploration using machine learning. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 347–351. doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070254
  • Wagenmakers, E.-J., Sarafoglou, A., & Aczel, B. (2022). One statistical analysis must not rule them all. Nature, 605(7910), 423–425. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-01332-8

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.