Perceived characteristics of outpatient appointment scheduling association with patient satisfaction and treatment adherence: An innovation theory application

References

• Barghash M, Saleet H. Enhancing outpatient appointment scheduling system performance when patient no-show percent and lateness rates are high. Int J Health Care Qual Assurance. 2018;31(4):309–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chew SF. Outpatient appointment scheduling with variable interappointment times. Model Simul Eng. 2011;2011:23.
   Google Scholar
• Stam P. Outpatient scheduling outpatient scheduling for a general practitioner. Amsterdam: VU University Amsterdam; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Lotfi V, Torres E. Improving an outpatient clinic utilization using decision analysis-based patient scheduling. Socio Econ Plan Sci. 2014;48(2):115–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akosen G. Assessment of follow-up appointments and visits system at the neurology clinic of Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital: Clients and providers perspectives.Masters Thesis. University of Ghana, Legon; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. Elements of diffusion. New York: Free Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Brandenburg L, Gabow P, Steele G, et al. Innovation and best practices in health care scheduling. Technical Report. Institute of Medicine of National Academy of Sciences: Washington; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Kohles JC, Bligh MC, Carsten MK. The vision integration process: applying Rogers’ diffusion of innovations theory to leader–follower communications. Leadership. 2013;9(4):466–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aizstrauta D, Ginters E, Eroles M-AP. Applying theory of diffusion of innovations to evaluate technology acceptance and sustainability. Proc Comp Sci. 2015;43:69–77.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson NL. Developing a questionnaire to measure perceived attributes of eHealth innovations. Am J Health Behav. 2007;31(6):612–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlfjord S, Lindberg M, Bendtsen P, et al. Key factors influencing adoption of an innovation in primary health care: a qualitative study based on implementation theory. BMC Fam Pract. 2010;11(1). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-11-60
   Google Scholar
• Wu I-L, Hsieh P-J. Hospital innovation and its impact on customer-perceived quality of care: a process-based evaluation approach. Total Qual Manag Bus Excel. 2015;26(1–2):46–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roham M, Gabrielyan AR, Archer NP. Predicting the impact of hospital health information technology adoption on patient satisfaction. Artif Intell Med. 2012;56(2):123–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuentes S, Berlioz M, Damián F, et al. Patient and healthcare professional satisfaction with 3D imaging new technologies for medical purposes. Radiología. 2020;62(1):46–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee D. Strategies for technology-driven service encounters for patient experience satisfaction in hospitals. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2018;137:118–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamal A, McKenzie K, Clark M. The impact of health information technology on the quality of medical and health care: a systematic review. Health Inform Manag J. 2009;38(3):26–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Yu P, Yan J, et al. Using diffusion of innovation theory to understand the factors impacting patient acceptance and use of consumer e-health innovations: a case study in a primary care clinic. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0726-2
   Google Scholar
• Fleuren M, Wiefferink K, Paulussen T. Determinants of innovation within health care organizations: literature review and Delphi study. Int J Qual Health Care. 2004;16(2):107–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plsek P. Complexity and the adoption of innovation in health care. In: Accelerating Quality Improvement in Health Care Strategies to Speed the Diffusion of Evidence-Based Innovations: 27–28 2003; Washington D.C.; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Sanson‐Fisher RW. Diffusion of innovation theory for clinical change. Med J Aust. 2004;180:S55–S56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Restuccia JD, Cohen AB, Horwitt JN, et al. Hospital implementation of health information technology and quality of care: are they related? BMC Med Inform Decis Making. 2012;12(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-109.
   Google Scholar
• Emani S, Peters E, Desai S, et al. Perceptions of adopters versus non-adopters of a patient portal: an application of diffusion of innovation theory. J Innov Health Inform. 2018;25(3):149–157. .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Friedman DS, Hahn SR, Gelb L, et al. Doctor–Patient communication, health-related beliefs, and adherence in Glaucoma: results from the Glaucoma adherence and persistency study. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:1320–1327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen JD, King AJ, Guntzviller LM, et al. Patient–provider communication and low-income adults: age, race, literacy, and optimism predict communication satisfaction. Patient Educ Counsel. 2010;79(1):30–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack LA, Treiman K, Rupert D, et al. Measuring patient-centered communication in cancer care: a literature review and the development of a systematic approach. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72:1085–1095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dibbelt S, Schaidhammer M, Fleischer C, et al. Patient–doctor interaction in rehabilitation: the relationship between perceived interaction quality and long-term treatment results. Patient Educ Counsel. 2009;76:328–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagosh J, Donald Boudreau J, Steinert Y, et al. The importance of physician listening from the patients’ perspective: enhancing diagnosis, healing, and the doctor–patient relationship. Patient Educ Counsel. 2011;85:369–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kock N, Hadaya P. Minimum sample size estimation in PLS‐SEM: the inverse square root and gamma‐exponential methods. Inform Syst J. 2018;28(1):227–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott SD, Plotnikoff RC, Karunamuni N, et al. Factors influencing the adoption of an innovation: an examination of the uptake of the Canadian Heart Health Kit (HHK). Implement Sci. 2008;3(1). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-3-41
   Google Scholar
• Boquiren VM, Hack TF, Beaver K, et al. What do measures of patient satisfaction with the doctor tell us? Patient Educ Counsel. 2015;98:1465–1473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson E, Sharma J, Bohren MA, et al. When the patient is the expert: measuring patient experience and satisfaction with care. Bull World Health Organization. 2019;97(8):563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMatteo MR. Variations in patients’ adherence to medical recommendations: a quantitative review of 50 years of research. Med Care. 2004;42:200–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trummer UF, Mueller UO, Nowak P, et al. Does physician–patient communication that aims at empowering patients improve clinical outcome?: a case study. Patient Educ Counsel. 2006;61(2):299–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J Market Theory Pract. 2011;19(2):139–152.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. Partial least squares structural equation modeling: rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Plan. 2013;46(1–2):1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer KE. Decision-making in healthcare: a practical application of partial least square path modeling to coverage of newborn screening programmes. BMC Med Inform Decis Making. 2012;12(1):1–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dang BN, Westbrook RA, Black WC, et al. Examining the link between patient satisfaction and adherence to HIV care: a structural equation model. PloS One. 2013;8(1):e54729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avkiran NK. An in-depth discussion and illustration of partial least squares structural equation modeling in health care. Health Care Manag Sci. 2018;21(3):401–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Risher JJ, Sarstedt M, et al. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur Bus Rev. 2019;31(1):2–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field A. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. London: Sage; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Jöreskog KG. Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika. 1971;36(4):409–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Market Res. 1981;18(1):39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Acad Market Sci. 2015;43(1):115–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao P, Yoo I, Lavoie J, et al. Web-based medical appointment systems: a systematic review. J Med Inter Res. 2017;19(4):e134.
   Google Scholar
• Chalker JC, Wagner AK, Tomson G, et al. Appointment systems are essential for improving chronic disease care in resource-poor settings: learning from experiences with HIV patients in Africa. Int Health. 2013;5(3):163–165. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katre AN. Assessment of the correlation between appointment scheduling and patient satisfaction in a pediatric dental setup. Int J Dent. 2014;2014:2014.
   Google Scholar
• Bardhan IR, Thouin MF. Health information technology and its impact on the quality and cost of healthcare delivery. Decis Supp Syst. 2013;55(2):438–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan X, Tang J, Yan C. Appointment scheduling optimization with two stages diagnosis for clinic outpatient. Computat Stat. 2020;35(2):469–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cvengros JA, Christensen AJ, Hillis SL, et al. Patient and physician attitudes in the health care context: attitudinal symmetry predicts patient satisfaction and adherence. Ann Behav Med. 2007;33(3):262–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milky G, Thomas J. Shared decision making, satisfaction with care and medication adherence among patients with diabetes. Patient Educ Counsel. 2020;103(3):661–669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhazzani AA, Alqahtani M, Alkhashrami S, et al. Treatment adherence and satisfaction among multiple sclerosis patients, cross sectional study, Saudi Arabia. J Neurol Sci. 2017;381:237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra P, Hansen EH, Sabroe S, et al. Adherence is associated with the quality of professional–patient interaction in Directly Observed Treatment Short-course, DOTS. Patient Educ Counsel. 2006;63(1–2):29–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider J, Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, et al. Better physician-patient relationships are associated with higher reported adherence to antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV infection. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19(11):1096–1103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zolnierek KBH, DiMatteo MR. Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: a meta-analysis. Med Care. 2009;47(8):826–834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paternotte E, Van Dulmen S, Van Der Lee N, et al. Factors influencing intercultural doctor–patient communication: a realist review. Patient Educ Counsel. 2015;98:420–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi-Javid A, Jalali Z, Klassen KJ. Outpatient appointment systems in healthcare: a review of optimization studies. Eur J Operation Res. 2017;258(1):3–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar