Investigating Visitor Profiles as a Valuable Addition to Museum Research

References

• Anderson, D., Piscitelli, B., & Everett, M. (2008). Competing agendas: Young children's museum field trips. Curator: The Museum Journal, 51(3), 253–273. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.2008.tb00311.x
   Google Scholar
• Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Black, G. (2005). The engaging museum: Developing museums for visitor involvement. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn: Mind, brain, experience and school, expanded edition. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bromme, R., Kienhues, D., & Stahl, E. (2008). Knowledge and epistemological beliefs: An intimate but complicate relationship. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Knowing, knowledge and beliefs (pp. 423–441). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Budner, S. (1962). Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. Journal of Personality, 30, 29–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1962.tb02303.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, L. M., & Lanza, S. T. (2010). Latent class and latent transition analysis: With applications in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Conley, A. E., Pintrich, P. R., Vekiri, I., & Harrison, D. (2004). Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 186–204. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, E., & Jensen, E. (2011). Towards a contextual turn in visitor studies: Evaluating visitor segmentation and identity-related motivations. Visitor Studies, 14(2), 127–140. doi: 10.1080/10645578.2011.608001
   Google Scholar
• Dochy, F. (1992). Assessment of prior knowledge as a determinant for future learning. The use of prior knowledge state tests and knowledge profiles. Utrecht: Uitgeverij Lemma B. V.
   Google Scholar
• Doering, Z. D., & Pekarik, A. J. (1996). Questioning the entrance narrative. Journal of Museum Education, 21(3), 20–25.
   Google Scholar
• Dudzinska-Przesmitzki, D., & Grenier, R. S. (2008). Nonformal and informal adult learning in museums: A literature review. Journal of Museum Education, 33(1), 9–22. doi: 10.1179/jme.2008.33.1.9
   Google Scholar
• Durant, J. (2004). The challenge and the opportunity of presenting ‘unfinished science’. In D. Chittenden, G. Farmelo, & B. V. Lewenstein (Eds.), Creating connections: Museums and the public understanding of current research (pp. 47–60). Lahnham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., & Adelman, L. M. (2003). Investigating the impact of prior knowledge, experience and interest on aquarium visitor learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 163–176. doi: 10.1002/tea.10070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (1992). The museum experience. Washington, DC: Whalesback Books.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2000). Learning from museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., Dierking, L. D., & Foutz, S. (2007). In principle, in practice. Forbes: Alta Mira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., Heimlich, J., & Bronnenkant, K. (2008). Using identity-related visit motivations as a tool for understanding adult zoo and aquarium visitors’ meaning-making. Curator: The Museum Journal, 51(1), 55–79. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.2008.tb00294.x
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., & Storksdieck, M. (2005). Using the contextual model of learning to understand visitor learning from a science center exhibition. Science Education, 89(5), 744–778. doi: 10.1002/sce.20078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feder, M. A., Shouse, A. W., Lewenstein, B., & Bell, P. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, L., & Webb, P. (1994). Vivent les differences: Identifying audiences for a museum Exhibition. Public Understanding of Science, 3, 277–290. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/3/3/003
   Google Scholar
• Frenkel-Brunswick, E. (1949). Intolerance of ambiguity as an emotional and perceptual personality variable. Journal of Personality, 18, 108–143. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1949.tb01236.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, A., Taskinen, P., Schütte, K., & PISA-Konsortium, Deutschland. (2009). PISA 2006 Skalenhandbuch - Dokumentation der Erhebungsinstrumente. Münster: Waxmann-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, R. M. (1965). The conditions of learning. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, K., Sani, M., & Thompson, J. (2006). Lifelong learning in museums: A European handbook. Bologna: IBC-CLUEB.
   Google Scholar
• Goulding, C. (2000). The museum environment and the visitor experience. European Journal of Marketing, 34(3/4), 261–278. doi: 10.1108/03090560010311849
   Google Scholar
• Graf, B., & Noschka-Roos, A. (2009). Stichwort: Lernen im Museum. Oder: Eine Kamerafahrt mit der Besucherforschung. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaften, 12, 7–27. doi: 10.1007/s11618-009-0059-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grenier, S., Barrette, A. M., & Ladouceur, R. (2005). Intolerance of uncertainty and intolerance of ambiguity: Similarities and differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(3), 593–600. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grüninger, R., Specht, I., Schnotz, W., & Lewalter, D. (2013). Personale Bedingungen der Verarbeitung von fragilem Wissen in Museen [Personal conditions of dealing with fragile knowledge in museums]. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 41(1), 2–19.
   Google Scholar
• Hein, G. E. (1998). Learning in the museum. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hidi, S. (2000). An interest researcher's perspective: The effects of extrinsic and intrinsic factors on motivation. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 309–339). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer, B. K. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 378–405. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper-Greenhill, E. (1994). The past, the present and the future: Museum education from 1790s to the 1990s. In E. Hooper-Greenhill (Ed.), The educational role of the museum (pp. 258–262). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper-Greenhill, E. (1999). The educational role of the museum. London: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper-Greenhill, E. (2013). Museums and their visitors. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, E., Dawson, E., & Falk, J. H. (2011). Dialogue and synthesis: Developing consensus in visitor research methodology. Visitor Studies, 14(2), 158–161. doi: 10.1080/10645578.2011.608003
   Google Scholar
• Kirchberg, V. (1996). Museum visitors and non-visitors in Germany: A representative survey. Poetics, 24, 239–258. doi: 10.1016/S0304-422X(96)00007-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchberg, V. (2005). Gesellschaftliche Funktionen von Museen. Makro- meso- und mikrosoziologische Perspektiven. Berliner Schriften zur Museumskunde, Band 20. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, H.-J. (1990). Der gläserne Besucher: Publikumsstrukturen einer Museumslandschaft. Berliner Schriften zur Museumskunde 8. Berlin: Staatliche Museen Preußischer Kulturbesitz.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, H.-J. (2000). Go West: Die Besucher des Deutschen Museums und ihre Meinungen über das Neue Verkehrsmuseum. Karlsruhe: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, A. (2011). Kulturmarketing. In A. Klein (Ed.), Kompendium Kulturmanagement – Handbuch für Studium und Praxis (pp. 539–558). München: Verlag Franz Vahlen.
   Google Scholar
• Kotler, N. G., Kotler, P., & Kotler, W. I. (2008). Museum marketing and strategy: Designing missions, building audiences, generating revenue and resources. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Krapp, A. (2002). Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: Theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Learning and Instruction, 12, 383–409. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00011-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruglanski, A. W., Webster, D. M., & Klem, A. (1993). Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(5), 861–876. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leinhardt, G., Crowley, K., & Knutson, K. (2002). Learning conversations in museums. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lewalter, D., Geyer, C., & Neubauer, K. (2014). Comparing the effectiveness of two communication formats on visitors’ understanding of nanotechnology. Visitor studies, 17(2), 159–176. doi: 10.1080/10645578.2014.945345
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, A. P. (1970). Revised scale for ambiguity tolerance: Reliability and validity. Psychological Reports, 26, 791–798. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1970.26.3.791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, S. (2011). Museumsbesuch und Ausstellungsdesign: Wechselseitige Verbindung und Austausch [Visit to a museum and exhibition design: Reciprocal bond and exchange]. In D. Harasser, K. Harrasser, St. Kiessling, K. Schneider, S. Sölkner, & V. Wöhrer (Eds.), Wissen Spielen: Untersuchungen zur Wissensaneignung von Kindern im Museum (pp. 237–259). Bielefeld: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535–569. doi: 10.1080/10705510701575396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekarik, A. J., & Schreiber, J. B. (2012). The power of expectation. Curator: The Museum Journal, 55(4), 487–496. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.2012.00171.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (1999). Motivational beliefs as resources for and constraints on conceptual change. In W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou, & M. Carretero (Eds.), New perspectives on conceptual change (advances in learning and instruction series) (pp. 33–50). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63, 167–199. doi: 10.3102/00346543063002167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radant, M., & Dalbert, C. (2006, September). Dimensionen der Komplexitätstoleranz: Ergebnisse einer Synopse von Persönlichkeitskonstrukten. Poster session presented at the 45. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie, Nuremberg.
   Google Scholar
• Reis, J. (1996). Inventar zur Messung der Ambiguitätsintoleranz (IMA). Heidelberg: Asanger.
   Google Scholar
• Roschelle, J. (1995). Learning in interactive environments: Prior knowledge and new experience. In J. H. Falk & L. D. Dierking (Eds.), Public institutions for personal learning (pp. 37–51). Washington, DC: American Association of Museums.
   Google Scholar
• Rounds, J. (2004). Strategies for the curiosity-driven museum visitor. Curator: The Museum Journal, 47, 389–412. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.2004.tb00135.x
   Google Scholar
• Schiefele, U. (1990). Thematisches Interesse, Variablen des Leseprozesses und Textverstehen. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 37(2), 304–332.
   Google Scholar
• Schiefele, U. (1996). Motivation und Lernen mit Texten. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Schommer-Aitkins, M. (2002). An evolving theoretical framework for an epistemological belief system. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology (pp. 103–118). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Schwan, S., Grajal, A., & Lewalter, D. (2014). Understanding and engagement in places of science experience: Science museums, science centers, zoos and aquariums. Special issue: Psychological dimensions of PUS and PES – psychological approaches for research on PUS. Educational Psychologist, 49(2), 70–85. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2014.917588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sippel, S. (2007). Ambiguität und Ambiguitäts(in)toleranz. München: GRIN Verlag GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Todd, S., & Lawson, R. (2001). Lifestyle segmentation and museum/gallery visiting behaviour. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 6(3), 269–277. doi: 10.1002/nvsm.152
   Google Scholar
• Westerberg, K. (1997). New audience research and development efforts at Shedd aquarium. Visitor Behavior, 12, 16.
   Google Scholar
• Yaneva, A., Rabesandratana, T. M., & Greiner, B. (2009). Staging scientific controversies: A gallery test on science museums’ interactivity. Public Understanding of Science, 18(1), 79–90. doi: 10.1177/0963662507077512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar