Core Skills for Effective Science Communication: A Teaching Resource for Undergraduate Science Education

References

• Academic Council of Deans of Science (ACDS). (2013). Background: Science threshold learning outcomes. Retrieved from http://www.acds.edu.au/tlcentre/centreprojects/current/
   Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (2009). Cultivating biological literacy. In C. A. Brewer & Smith, D. (Eds.), Vision and change in undergraduate biology: A call to action (pp. 10–19). Author: Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). 2014. Communicating science: Tools for scientists and engineers. Retrieved from http://www.aaas.org/communicatingscience
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government Department of Industry. (2013). Higher education statistics. Retrieved from http://www.innovation.gov.au/highereducation/HigherEducationStatistics/Pages/default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Australian Qualifications Framework (AQF). (2013). AQF specification for the masters degree. Retrieved from http://www.aqf.edu.au/
   Google Scholar
• Baram-Tsabari, A., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2013). An instrument for assessing scientists’ written skills in public communication of science. Science Communication, 35(1), 56–85. doi:10.1177/1075547012440634
   Google Scholar
• Barrie, S., Hughes, C., Smith, C., & Thomson, K. (2009). Key issues to consider in the renewal of learning and teaching experiences to foster Graduate Attributes. Retrieved from http://www.itl.usyd.edu.au/projects/nationalgap/resources/GAPpdfs/NationalGAP_issues_Papers.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Besley, J. C., & Tanner, A. H. (2011). What science communication scholars think about training scientists to communicate. Science Communication, 33(2), 239–263. doi:10.1177/1075547010386972
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Bray, B., France, B., & Gilbert, J. K. (2012). Identifying the essential elements of effective science communication: What do the experts say? International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 2(1), 23–41. doi:10.1080/21548455.2011.611627
   Google Scholar
• Brownell, S. E., Price, J. V., & Steinman, L. (2013a). A writing-intensive course improves biology undergraduates’ perception and confidence of their abilities to read scientific literature and communicate science. Advances in Physiology Education, 37(1), 70–79. doi:10.1152/advan.00138.2012
   Google Scholar
• Brownell, S. E., Price, J. V., & Steinman, L. (2013b). Science communication to the general public: Why we need to teach undergraduate and graduate students this skill as part of their formal scientific training. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 12(1), E6–E10.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, T. W., O'Connor, D. J., & Stocklmayer, S. M. (2003). Science communication: A contemporary definition. Public Understanding of Science, 12(2), 183–202. doi:10.1177/09636625030122004
   Google Scholar
• Carrada, G. (2006). A scientist's survival kit: Communicating science. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/pdf/communicating-science_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Colthorpe, K., Rowland, S., & Leach, J. (2013). Good practice guide (Science): Threshold learning outcome 4: Communication. Retrieved from ACDS http://www.acds.edu.au/tlcentre/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Science-Good-Practice-Guide-2013-TLO4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, T. (2013). Bringing values and deliberation to science communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. doi:10.1073/pnas.1212740110
   Google Scholar
• Divan, A., & Mason, S. (2015). A programme-wide training framework to facilitate scientific communication skills development amongst biological sciences Masters students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 1–25. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2014.1000276
   Google Scholar
• Ewan, C. (2009). Learning and teaching in Australian universities: A thematic analysis of cycle 1 AUQA Audits. Retrieved from VOCEDplus http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/238815
   Google Scholar
• Fischhoff, B. (2013). The sciences of science communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 14033–14039. doi:10.1073/pnas.1213273110
   Google Scholar
• Fog, K., Budtz, C., Munch, P., & Blanchette, S. (2010). Storytelling: Branding in practice. Frederiksberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Graduate Careers Australia. (2011). Graduate destinations 2011: A report on the work and study outcomes of recent higher education graduates. Retrieved from www.graduatecareers.com.au
   Google Scholar
• Gray, F. E., Emerson, L., & MacKay, B. (2005). Meeting the demands of the workplace: Science students and written skills. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(4), 425–435. doi:10.1007/s10956-005-8087-y
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, M., & Riordan, D. (2001). Civic scientist/civic duty. Science Communication, 23, 28–40. doi:10.1177/1075547001023001003
   Google Scholar
• Herok, G., Chuck, J., & Millar, T. (2013). Teaching and evaluating graduate attributes in science based disciplines. Creative Education, 4(7), 42–49. Retrieved from http://researchdirect.uws.edu.au/islandora/object/uws:16641 doi: 10.4236/ce.2013.47A2008
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S., Yates, B., & Kelder, J. A. (2011). Learning and teaching academic standards project: Science learning and teaching academic standards statement. Retrieved from ABDC: http://www.abdc.edu.au/data/Accounting_LS/Accounting_Learning_Standards_-_February_2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Knight, P. T. (2001). Complexity and curriculum: A process approach to curriculum-making. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(3), 369–381. doi:10.1080/13562510120061223
   Google Scholar
• Kuchel, L., Stevens, S. K., Wilson, R., & Cokley, J. (2014). A documentary video assignment to enhance learning in large first-year science classes. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 22(4), 48–64.
   Google Scholar
• Lauer, T., & Hendrix, J. (2009). A Model for quantifying student learning via repeated writing assignments and discussions. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(3), 425–437. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ869327
   Google Scholar
• Leshner, A. (2003). Public engagement with science. Science, 299, 977. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3833513 doi: 10.1126/science.299.5609.977
   Google Scholar
• Mayhew, M. A., & Hall, M. K. (2012). Science communication in a café scientifique for high school teens. Science Communication, 34(4), 546–554. doi:10.1177/1075547012444790
   Google Scholar
• McInnis, C., Hartley, R., & Anderson, M. (2000). What did you do with your science degree? A national study of employment outcomes for science degree holders 1990–2000. Retrieved from the University of Melbourne Centre for the Study of Higher Education https://cshe.unimelb.edu.au/research/disciplines/docs/ScienceR.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McKinnon, M., Orthia, L. A., Grant, W. J., & Lmberts, R. (2014). Real-world assessment as an integral component of an undergraduate science communication program. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 22(5), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer-Mapstone, L., & Kuchel, L. (2015). Integrating communication skills into undergraduate science degrees: A practical and evidence-based approach. Teaching and Learning Inquiry. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer-Mapstone, L., & Kuchel, L. (2015). Teaching scientists to communicate: Evidence-based assessment for undergraduate science education. International Journal of Science Education, 37(10), 1613–1638. doi:10.1080/09500693.2015.1045959
   Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, J., & Gascoigne, T. (1995). Science journalism in Australia. Public Understanding of Science, 4(4), 411–428. doi:10.1088/0963-6625/4/4/005
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S., Fahy, D., & Team, T. E. (2009). Can science communication workshops train scientists for reflexive public engagement?: The ESConet Experience. Science Communication, 31(1), 116–126. doi:10.1177/1075547009339048
   Google Scholar
• Mulder, H. A. J., Longnecker, N., & Davis, L. S. (2008). The state of science communication programs at Universities around the world. Science Communication, 30(2), 277–287. doi:10.1177/1075547008324878
   Google Scholar
• Murry, J. W., & Hammons, J. O. (1995). Delphi—a versatile methodology for conducting qualitative research. Review of Higher Education, 18(4), 423–436. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ508592 doi: 10.1353/rhe.1995.0008
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Council of Graduate Studies (OCGS). (2005). Graduate degree level expectations. Retrieved from http://cou.on.ca/
   Google Scholar
• Panitz, T. (2001). Learning together: Keeping teachers and students actively involved in learning by writing across the curriculum. A sourcebook of ideas and exercises. Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Pope-Ruark, R. (2011). Know thy audience: Helping students engage a threshold concept using audience-based pedagogy. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 6. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl/vol5/iss1/6 doi: 10.20429/ijsotl.2011.050106
   Google Scholar
• Quality Assurance Agency UK (QAA). (2007). Subject benchmark statement: Biosciences. Retrieved from http://www.qaa.ac.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. (2004). Narrative across media: The languages of storytelling. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• van der Sanden, M. C. A., & Meijman, F. J. (2008). Dialogue guides awareness and understanding of science: An essay on different goals of dialogue leading to different science communication approaches. Public Understanding of Science, 17(1), 89–103. doi:10.1177/0963662506067376
   Google Scholar
• Sevian, H., & Gonsalves, L. (2008). Analysing how scientists explain their research: A rubric for measuring the effectiveness of scientific explanations. International Journal of Science Education, 30(11), 1441–1467. doi:10.1080/09500690802267579
   Google Scholar
• Sharpe, P., & Blanchfield, J. (2014). Chemistry for the masses. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 22(4), 33–47.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, S. (2013). What communication skills are taught in Australian science degrees and what else do students learn from “communication to non-scientists” tasks? (Unpublished honours thesis). University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Tuten, H., & Temesvari, L. (2013). Popular science journalism: Facilitating learning through peer review and communication of science news. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(4), 46–49. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1011748
   Google Scholar
• Universities Australia. (2014). Student numbers and characteristics. Retrieved from https://www.universitiesaustralia.edu.au/australias-universities/key-facts-and-data/Student-Numbers---Characteristics#.Ux_aioaQbz0
   Google Scholar
• University of Sydney (2008). Graduate destination report 2008. Retrieved from http://sydney.edu.au/careers/
   Google Scholar
• West, M. (2012). STEM education and the workplace. Office of the Chief Scientist, Australian Government. Retrieved from http://www.chiefscientist.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/OPS4-STEMEducationAndTheWorkplace-web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Whittington, C. P., Pellock, S. J., Cunningham, R. L., & Cox, J. R. (2014). Combining content and elements of communication into an upper-level biochemistry course. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 42(2), 136–141. doi:10.1002/bmb.20770
   Google Scholar
• Zou, B. (2014). Teaching communication for science engagement with non-scientists in tertiary science education: Student, lecturer and employer beliefs (Unpublished honours thesis). University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
   Google Scholar