Experiential learning theory: the importance of outdoor classrooms in environmental education

References

• Alerby, E. (2000). A way of visualizing children’s and young people’s thoughts about the environment: A study of drawings. Environmental Education Research, 6(3), 205–222. doi: 10.1080/13504620050076713
   Google Scholar
• Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Bamberger, Y., & Tal, T. (2006). What do students learn on class visits to natural history museums? Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. San Francisco, California.
   Google Scholar
• Barraza, L. (1999). Children’s drawings about the environment. Environmental Education Research, 5(1), 49–66. doi: 10.1080/1350462990050103
   Google Scholar
• Behrendt, M., & Franklin, T. (2014). A review of research on school field trips and their value in education. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 9, 235–245. doi:10.12973/ijese.2014.213a
   Google Scholar
• Bhat, V. D. (2004). Experiential learning: A handout for teacher educators. New Delhi: Regional Institute of Education, Mysore.
   Google Scholar
• Blatt, E., & Patrick, P. G. (2014). An exploration of pre-service teachers’ experiences in outdoor ‘places’ and intentions for teaching in the outdoors. International Journal of Science Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/09500693.2014.918294
   Google Scholar
• Bogner, F. (1998). The influence of short-term outdoor ecology education on long-term variables of environmental perspective. Journal of Environmental Education, 29(4), 17–29. doi: 10.1080/00958969809599124
   Google Scholar
• Bottinelli, C. (1976). A brief summary of the status of secondary environmental education in Colorado. Journal of Environmental Education, 7(4), 38–45. doi: 10.1080/00958964.1976.9941545
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, R. (2007). Children's perceptions and learning about tropical rainforests: An analysis of their drawings. Journal of Environmental Education Research, 13(1), 75–96. doi:10.1080/13504620601122731
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, M. (1967). Biology out-of-doors in the elementary school. The American Biology Teacher, 29, 207–210. doi: 10.2307/4441661
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cainey, J., Bowker, R., Humphrey, L., & Murray, N. (2012). Assessing informal learning in an aquarium using pre- and post-visit drawings. Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice, 18(3), 265–281. doi:10.1080/13803611.2012.670400
   Google Scholar
• Carnes, G. (2000). M.A.T. intern’s views of scientists. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of the Educators for Teachers of Science, Austin, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, D. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The draw-a-scientist test. Science Education, 67(2), 255–265. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730670213
   Google Scholar
• Chang, N. (2012). The role of drawing in young children’s construction of science concepts. Early Childhood Education Journal, 40, 187–193. doi:10.1007/s10643-012-0511-3
   Google Scholar
• Chawla, L., & Cushing, D. F. (2007). Education for strategic environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Education Research, 13(4), 437–452. doi:10.1080/13504620701581539
   Google Scholar
• Colburn, A. (2000). Constructivism: Science education’s “grand unifying theory”. The Clearing House, 74(1), 9–12. doi: 10.1080/00098655.2000.11478630
   Google Scholar
• Cole, A. G. (2007). Expanding the field: Revisiting environmental education principles through multidisciplinary frameworks. Journal of Environmental Education, 38(2), 35–44. doi: 10.3200/JOEE.38.1.35-46
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, S. K., Passmore, C., & Anderson, D. (2010). Learning on zoo field trips: The interaction of the agendas and practices of students, teachers, and zoo educators. Science Education, 94, 122–141. doi:10.1002/sce.20356
   Google Scholar
• DeWitt, J., & Storksdieck, M. (2008). A short review of school field trips: Key findings from the past and implications for the future. Visitor Studies, 11(2), 181–197. doi:10.1080/10645570802355562
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, J., Rickinson, M., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., & Sanders, D. (2006). The value of outdoor learning: Evidence from research in the UK and elsewhere. School Science Review, 87(320), 107–110.
   Google Scholar
• Disinger, J. (1984). What research says: Learning in the environment. School Science and Mathematics, 84, 158–163. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1984.tb09535.x
   Google Scholar
• Dolan, A. M. (2016). Place-based curriculum making: Devising a synthesis between primary geography and outdoor learning. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 16(1), 49–62. doi: 10.1080/14729679.2015.1051563
   Google Scholar
• Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Children’s ideas in science. Milton Keynes: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eaton, S. E. (2010). Formal, Non-formal and informal learning: The case of literacy, essential skills, and language learning in Canada. Calgary: Eaton International Consulting.
   Google Scholar
• Eick, C. J. (2012). Use of the outdoor classroom and nature-study to support science and literacy learning: A narrative case study of a third-grade classroom. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23, 789–803. doi:10.1007/s10972-011-9236-1
   Google Scholar
• Endreny, A. H. (2010). Urban 5th graders conceptions during a place-based inquiry unit on watersheds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 501–517. doi:10.1002/tea.20348
   Google Scholar
• Ernst, C. M., Buddle, C. M., & Soluk, L. (2014). The value of introducing natural history field research into undergraduate curricula: A case study. Bioscience Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.11120/beej.2014.00023
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., & Balling, J. D. (1982). The field trip milieu: Learning and behavior as a function of contextual events. Journal of Educational Research, 76(1), 22–28. doi: 10.1080/00220671.1982.10885418
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2000). Visitor experiences and the making of meaning. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, J., Knapp, D., & Benton, G. M. (2007). An elementary school environmental education field trip: Long-term effects on ecological and environmental knowledge and attitude development. The Journal of Environmental Education, 38(3), 33–42. doi:10.3200/JOEE.38.3.33-42
   Google Scholar
• Finson, K. (2002). Drawing a scientist: What we do and do not know after fifty years of drawings. School Science and Mathematics, 102, 335–346. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb18217.x
   Google Scholar
• Finson, K., Beaver, J., & Cramond, B. (1995). Development and field test of a checklist for the draw-a-scientist test. School Science and Mathematics, 95, 335–346. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1995.tb15762.x
   Google Scholar
• Flick, L. (1990). Scientist in residence program improving children’s image of science and scientists. School Science and Mathematics, 90, 204–214. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1990.tb15536.x
   Google Scholar
• Gamer, M., Lemon, J., & Singh, I. F. P. (2012). Irr: Various coefficients of interrater reliability and agreement. R package version 0.84. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=irr
   Google Scholar
• Geelan, D. R. (1997). Prior knowledge, prior conceptions, prior constructs: What do constructivists really mean, and are they practicing what they preach? Australian Science Teachers Journal, 43(3), 26–28.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, B. L., Marek, E. A. & Cavallo, A. M. (2001). Development of an informal learning opportunities assay. International Journal of Science Education, 23(6), 569–583. doi: 10.1080/09500690116959
   Google Scholar
• Gotelli, N. J., & Ellison, A. M. (2004). Framing and testing hypotheses. In A primer of ecological statistics (pp. 79–106). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
   Google Scholar
• Hallgren, K. A. (2012). Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: An overview and tutorial. Tutorials in Qualitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 23–34. doi: 10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p023
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, H. W. (1990). An experimental study of the effect of field trips upon the development of scientific attitudes in a ninth grade general science class. Science Education, 35(5), 242–248. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730350504
   Google Scholar
• Hill, D., & Wheeler, A. (1991). Towards a clearer understanding of students’ ideas about science and technology: An exploratory study. Research in Science and Technological Education, 9(2), 125–138. doi: 10.1080/0263514910090202
   Google Scholar
• Hofstein, A., & Rosenfeld, S. (1996). Bridging the gap between formal and informal science learning. Studies in Science Education, 28, 87–112. doi: 10.1080/03057269608560085
   Google Scholar
• Huber, R., & Burton, G. (1995). What do students think scientists look like? School Science and Mathematics, 9, 371–376. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1995.tb15804.x
   Google Scholar
• Idema, J., & Patrick, P. G. (2016). Visitor experiences during a science-themed community event. In J. Lavonen, K. Juuti, J. Lampiselkä, A. Uitto, & K. Hahl (Eds.), Electronic proceedings of the ESERA 2015 Conference. Science education research: Engaging learners for a sustainable future, Part 9 (co-ed. M, Achiam & G. Carvalho), (pp. 1241–1250). Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, L. J. W. (2014). Evaluating learning on the edge teacher workshops (Unpublished master’s thesis). Lesley University, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. G., & Brader-Araje, L. (2002). The impact of constructivism on education: Language, discourse, and meaning. American Communication Journal, 5(3), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Karahan, E., & Roehrig, G. (2015). Constructing media artifacts in a social constructivist environment to enhance students’ environmental awareness and activism. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24, 103–118. doi:10.1007/s10956-014-9525-5
   Google Scholar
• Kendrick, M., & McKay, R. (2004). Drawings as an alternative way of understanding young children’s constructions of literacy. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 4, 109–128. doi: 10.1177/1468798404041458
   Google Scholar
• Knapp, D., & Barrie, E. (2001). Content evaluation of an environmental science field trip. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(4), 351–357. doi: 10.1023/A:1012247203157
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kossack, A., & Bogner, F. X. (2012). How does a one-day environmental education programme support individual connectedness with nature? Journal of Biological Education, 46(3), 180–187. doi:10.1080/00219266.2011.634016
   Google Scholar
• Krepel, W. J., & DuVall, C. R. (1981). Field trips: A guide for planning and conducting educational experiences: Analysis and action series. West Haven, CN: NEA Distribution Center.
   Google Scholar
• Leftridge, A., & James, R. (1980). A study of the perceptions of environmental issues of urban and rural high school students. Journal of Environmental Education, 12(1), 3–7. doi: 10.1080/00958964.1980.9941910
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein, M., Pruski, L., Marshall, C., Blalock, C., Liu, Y., & Plaetke, R. (2005). Do middle school students really have fixed images of elders? The Journal of Gerontology, 60B(1), S37–S47. doi: 10.1093/geronb/60.1.S37
   Google Scholar
• Lisowski, M., & Disinger, J. (1991). The effect of field-based instruction on student understandings of ecological concepts. Journal of Environmental Education, 23(1), 19–23. doi: 10.1080/00958964.1991.9943065
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, A. (2010). Heavy thinking: Young children’s theorising about mass. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 15(4), 4–8.
   Google Scholar
• Market Research Partners, Edinburgh. (2008). Public perceptions of wild places and landscapes in Scotland. Commissioned Report No.291 (ROAME No. F06NC03).
   Google Scholar
• Matteson, S. M., Ganesh, B. S., Coward, F. L., & Patrick, P. (2012). Middle-level preservice mathematics teachers’ mental representations of classroom floor plans. Teaching Education, 23(4), 429–450. doi: 10.1080/10476210.2012.672407
   Google Scholar
• McCaw, S. (1980). Teacher attitudes toward environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 11(2), 18–23. doi: 10.1080/00958964.1980.9941364
   Google Scholar
• Meichtry, Y., & Smith, J. (2007). The impact of a place-based professional development program on teachers’ confidence, attitudes, and classroom practices. The Journal of Environmental Education, 38(2), 15–31. doi: 10.3200/JOEE.38.1.15-34
   Google Scholar
• Miglietta, A. M., Belmonte, G., & Boero, F. (2008). A summative evaluation of science learning: A case study of the marine biology museum “Pietro Parenzan” (South East Italy). Visitor Studies, 11(2), 213–219. doi: 10.1080/10645570802355984
   Google Scholar
• Moseley, C., Desjean-Perrotta, B., & Utley, J. (2010). The draw-an-environment test rubric (DALET-R): Exploring pre-service teachers’ mental models of the environment. Journal of Environmental Education Research, 16(2), 189–208. doi:10.1080/13504620903548674
   Google Scholar
• Moseley, C., & Norris, D. (1999). How pre-service teachers perceive scientists. Science and Children, 37, 50–56.
   Google Scholar
• Nadelson, L. S., & Jordan, J. R. (2012). Student attitudes toward and recall of outside day: An environmental science field trip. The Journal of Education Research, 105, 220–231. doi:10.1080/00220671.2011.5765715
   Google Scholar
• Nedovic, S., & Morrissey, A. (2013). Calm active and focused: Children’s responses to an organic outdoor learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 16, 281–295. doi:10.1007/s10984-013-9127-9
   Google Scholar
• North America Association for Environmental Education. (2004). Guidelines for the preparation and professional development of environmental educators. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://eelinked.naaee.net/n/elp
   Google Scholar
• Palmberg, I. E., & Kuru, K. (2000). Outdoor activities as a basis for environmental responsibility. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31(4), 32–36. doi: 10.1080/00958960009598649
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, P. (2014). Social interactions and familial relationships preservice science teachers describe during interviews about their drawings of the endocrine and gastrointestinal systems. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 9(2), 159–175.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, P., & Tunnicliffe, S. (2010). Science teachers' drawings of what is inside the human body. Journal of Biological Education, 44(2), 22–30. doi: 10.1080/00219266.2010.9656198
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, P., Matthews, C., & Tunnicliffe, S. (2011). Using a field trip inventory to determine if listening to elementary school students' conversations, while on a zoo field trip, enhances preservice teachers' abilities to plan zoo field trips. International Journal of Science Education, 1–25, iFirst Article. Available: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09500693.2011.620035
   Google Scholar
• Pedretti, E. (2002). T. Kuhn meets T. Rex: Critical conversations and new directions in science centres and science museums. Studies in Science Education, 37, 1–42. doi: 10.1080/03057260208560176
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Picker, S., & Berry, J. (2000). Investigating pupils’ images of mathematicians. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 43, 65–94. doi: 10.1023/A:1017523230758
   Google Scholar
• Prather, J. (1989). Review of the value of field trips in science instruction. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 1(1), 10–17. doi: 10.1007/BF03172958
   Google Scholar
• Prokop, P., Tuncer, G., & Kvasnicak, R. (2007). Short-term effects of field programme on students’ knowledge and attitude toward biology: A Slovak experience. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(3), 247–255. doi:10.1007/s10956-007-9044-8
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from: http://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Ramey-Gassert, L., Walberg, H. J. III & Walberg, H. J. (1994). Re-examining connections: Museums as science learning environments. Science Education, 78(4), 345–363. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730780403
   Google Scholar
• Randall, R. R. (2012). Go outside to learn: The value of outdoor learning environments. Educational Facility Planner, 46(2–3), 18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Reith, E. (1997). Drawing development. In A. M. Kindler (Ed.), Child development in art (pp. 59–79). Alexandria, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students’ practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89, 634–656. doi: 10.1002/sce.20065
   Google Scholar
• Scarce, R. (1997). Field trips as short-term experiential education. Teaching Sociology, 25, 219–226. doi: 10.2307/1319398
   Google Scholar
• Schwaab, K. (1983). Instructional methods: Their use and effectiveness in environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 14(2), 8–12. doi: 10.1080/00958964.1983.10801931
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. (2013). Best practices in experiential learning. Accessed from The Learning & Teaching Office at Ryerson University. Retrieved from: http://www.ryerson.ca/lt/resources/newsletters/best_practices/pasttopics/mar2013.html.
   Google Scholar
• Sharpe, P., Royce, S., Greaney, M., & Fields, R. (2004). Children’s drawings of physical implications for needs assessment and programming. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 75(3), 27–32. doi: 10.1080/07303084.2004.10609249
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, C., & Speelman, L. (1986). Affecting environmental attitudes through outdoor education. Journal of Environmental Education, 17(2), 20–23. doi: 10.1080/00958964.1986.9941405
   Google Scholar
• Shepardson, D. P. (2005). Student ideas: What is an environment? Journal of Environmental Education, 36(4), 49–58.
   Google Scholar
• Shepardson, D. P., Wee, B., Priddy, M., & Harbor, J. (2007). Students’ mental models of the environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(2), 327–348. doi:10.1002/tea.20161
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, D. (1998). Using natural settings for environmental education: Perceived benefits and barriers. Journal of Environmental Education, 29(3), 23–31. doi: 10.1080/00958969809599115
   Google Scholar
• Stapp, W. (1970). Environmental encounters. Journal of Environmental Education, 2(1), 35–41.
   Google Scholar
• Sturm, H., & Bogner, F. X. (2010). Learning at workstations in two different environments: A museum and a classroom. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 36, 14–19. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2010.09.002
   Google Scholar
• Tal, R. T. (2004). Using a field trip to a wetland as a guide for conceptual understanding in environmental education: A case study of a pre-service teacher’s research. Chemistry Education: Research & Practice, 5(2), 127–142.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J., & Hairston, R. (2003). Adolescent students’ images of an environmental scientist: An opportunity for constructivist teaching. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 7(4), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J., Pederson, J., & Finson, K. (2001). Validating the Draw-A-Science-Teacher-Test Checklist (DASTT-C): Exploring mental models and teacher beliefs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12(4), 295–310. doi: 10.1023/A:1014216328867
   Google Scholar
• Toumey, C., Besley, J., Blanchard, M., Brown, M., Cobb, M., Ecklund, E. H., … Lewenstein, B. (2010). Science in the service of citizens & consumers: The NSF workshop on public knowledge of science, October 2010. Retrieved from http://www.sc.edu/healthcomm/news/nano.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO-UNEP. (1976). The Belgrade Charter: A global framework for environmental education. Connect: UNESCO-UNEP Environmental Education Newsletter, 1(1), 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO-UNEP. (1978). Final report, intergovernmental conference on environmental education, Tbilisi (USSR), October 14–26, 1977. Paris: UNESCO-UNEP.
   Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S. (2001). How children learn. Brussels: International Academy of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, A., Glaspell, B., Christensen, N., Lachapelle, P., Sahanatien, V., & Gertsch, F. (2007). Giving voice to wild- lands visitors: Selecting indicators to protect and sustain experiences in the eastern Arctic of Nunavut. Environmental Management, 40, 880–888. doi: 10.1007/s00267-007-9019-9
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (2009). A social theory of learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists in their own words (pp. 209–218). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zeldin, A., & Pajares, F. (2000). Against the odds: Self-efficacy beliefs of women in mathematical, scientific, and technological careers. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 215–246. doi: 10.3102/00028312037001215
   Google Scholar