352
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Analysing the multiplicity of voices in the agora: using actor-network theory to unravel a complex issue

, ORCID Icon &
Pages 323-340 | Received 08 Dec 2015, Accepted 11 Jun 2017, Published online: 07 Jul 2017

References

  • Ashley, M. (2000). Science: An unreliable friend to environmental education? Environmental Education Research, 6(3), 269–280. doi: 10.1080/713664678
  • Bencze, L., & Carter, L. (2011). Globalizing students acting for the common good. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 638–669. doi: 10.1002/tea.20419
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • Callon, M. (1990). Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. The Sociological Review, 38(S1), 132–161. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03351.x
  • Department of Conservation. (2015). Battle for our birds programme. Retrieved from www.doc.govt.nz/ourwork/battle-for-our-birds/
  • Eason, C., Miller, A., Ogilvie, S., & Fairweather, A. (2011). An updated review of the toxicology and ecotoxicology of sodium fluoracetate (1080) in relation to its use as a pest control tool in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 35(1), 1–20. Retrieved from www.newzealandecology.org/nzje
  • Eichelbaum, T., Allan, J., Fleming, J., & Randerson, R. (2001). Report of the royal commission on genetic modification. Report and recommendations. Wellington: Royal Commission on Genetic Modification. Retrieved from http://www.mfe.govt.nz/publications/hazards/report-royal-commission-genetic-modification
  • Environmental Risk Management Authority (ERMA). (2007). The reassessment of 1080. Wellington: Author. Retrieved from http://www.epa.govt.nz/Publications/ERMA-1080-Reassessment.pdf
  • France, B. (2011). How post normal views of science have contributed to a model of biotechnology. Futures, 43, 166–172. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2010.10.005
  • Fraser, W. (2001). Introduced wildlife in New Zealand: A survey of general public views. Landcare Research Science Series, No 23. Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand. Landcare Research- Manaaki Whenua.
  • Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25(7), 735–755. doi: 10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L
  • Gallopin, G. C., Funtowicz, S., O’Connor, M., & Ravetz, J. (2001). Science for the twenty-first century: From social contract to the scientific core. International Social Science Journal, 53(168), 219–229. doi:10.1111/issj.2001.53.issue-168/issuetoc doi: 10.1111/1468-2451.00311
  • Gibbons, M. (1999). Science’s new social contract with society. Nature, 402, C81–C82. Supplement. Retrieved from www.nature.com. EBSCO. doi: 10.1038/35011576
  • Graf, C. (2016). Are Maori being misled over 1080 poison drops? Scoop News. Retrieved from www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO10603/SOO364/are-maori-being-misled-over-1080-poison-drops.htm
  • Green, W., & Rohan, M. (2012). Oppositions to aerial 1080 poisoning for control of invasive mammals in New Zealand: Risk perceptions and agency responses. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 42(3), 185–213. doi:10.1080/03036785.2011.556130 doi: 10.1080/03036758.2011.556130
  • Harmsworth, G. R., & Awatere, S. (2013). Indigenous Māori knowledge and perspectives of ecosystems. In J. R. Dymond (Ed.), Ecosystems services in New Zealand – conditions and trends (pp. 274–286). Lincoln: Whenua Press.
  • Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645–670. doi: 10.1080/09500690305021
  • Kapiti Independent Reporters. (2016). Ngāi Tahu’s Surprising stance on 1080. Retrieved from http://kapitiindependentnews.net.nz/ngai-tahus-surprising-stance-on-1080/
  • Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the social. An introduction to actor-network-theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life. The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Legardez, A., & Simonneaux, L. (2006). L’ecole a l’epreuve de l’actualite – Enseigner les questions socialement vives. Issey-les-Moulineaux: ESF.
  • McLean, M. (2016, March 13). Mixed feelings on use of 1080. Sunday Herald. Retrieved from http://www.nzherald.co.nz/the-country/news/article.cfm?c_id=16&objectid=11702679
  • Murray, P. (2008). KAKA Delegation to meet with bdc. Retrieved from http://karamea.org.nz/karameans_advocating_kahurangi_action/news/kaka_delegation_to_meet_with_bdc.
  • Northland Age. (2016, February). Rats on the run. Retrieved from http://www.nzherald.co.nz/northland-age/news/article.cfm?c_id=1503402&objectid=11594059
  • Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment (PCE). (2011). Evaluating the use of 1080: Predators, poisons and silent forests. Retrieved from www.pce.parliament.nz
  • Pierce, C. (2015a). Learning about a fish from an ANT: Actor network theory and science education in the postgenomic era. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10, 83–107. doi: 10.1007/s11422-013-9498-3
  • Pierce, C. (2015b). Against neoliberal pedagogies of plants and people: Mapping actor networks of biocapital in learning gardens. Environmental Educational Research, 21(3), 460–477. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2014.994168
  • Price, M. (2015, June 4). Lack of disease raises questions over possum killing, poison drops. The New Zealand Herald. Retrieved from http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11194374
  • Ravetz, J. (1990). The merger of knowledge with power. Essays in critical science. London: Mansell.
  • Ravetz, J. (2006). Post-normal science and the complexity of transitions towards sustainability. Ecological Complexity, 3, 275–284. doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2007.02.001
  • Scanlon, L. (2014, January 30). Debate flares over more 1080 drops. The New Zealand Herald. Retrieved from http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11459697
  • Serpell, J. A. (2004). Factors influencing human attitudes to animals and their welfare. Animal Welfare, 13, S145–S151.
  • Simonneaux, L., Panissal, N., & Brossais, E. (2013). Students’ perception of risk about nanotechnology after an SAQ teaching strategy. International Journal of Science Education, 35(14), 2376–2406. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.635164
  • Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280–285. doi: 10.1126/science.3563507
  • Stowell, L. (2016). Iwi agrees to 1080 drops – with conditions. Retrieved from http://www.nzherald.co.nz/the-country/news/article.cfm?c_id=16&objectid=11702679
  • Turnpenny, J., Jones, M., & Lorenzoni, I. (2010). Where now for post-normal science? A critical review of its development, definitions and uses. (editorial). Science, Technology and Human Values, Reprint. Retrieved from http://sthv.sagepub.com
  • Van Eijck, M. (2010). Addressing the dynamics of science in curricular reform for scientific literacy: The case of genomics. International Journal of Science Education, 32(18), 2429–2449. doi: 10.1080/09500690903473399
  • Venturini, T. (2010). Diving in magma: How to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science, 19(3), 258–273. doi: 10.1177/0963662509102694
  • Weinstein, M. (2008). Finding science in the school body: Reflections on transgressing the boundaries of science education and the social studies of science. Science Education, 92, 389–403. doi: 10.1002/sce.20267
  • Wilson, C., & Cannon, J. (2004). Community consultation processes for aerial 1080 applications. Science for Conservation, 247. Wellington New Zealand, Department of Conservation.
  • Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357–377. doi: 10.1002/sce.20048

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.