1,498
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Tacit knowledge and girls’ notions about a field science community of practice

, ORCID Icon &

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82(4), 417–436. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199807)82:4<417::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-E
  • Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2012). Science aspirations, capital, and family habitus how families shape children’s engagement and identification with science. American Educational Research Journal, 49(5), 881–908. doi: 10.3102/0002831211433290
  • Archer, L., DeWitt, J., & Willis, B. (2014). Adolescent boys’ science aspirations: Masculinity, capital, and power. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 1–30. doi: 10.1002/tea.21122
  • Barab, S. A., & Hay, K. E. (2001). Doing science at the elbows of experts: Issues related to the science apprenticeship camp. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(1), 70–102. doi: 10.1002/1098-2736(200101)38:1<70::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-L
  • Baram-Tsabari, A., & Yarden, A. (2011). Quantifying the gender gap in science interests. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(3), 523–550. doi: 10.1007/s10763-010-9194-7
  • Basu, S. J., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2007). Developing a sustained interest in science among urban minority youth. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(3), 466–489. doi: 10.1002/tea.20143
  • Bell, P., Tzou, C., Bricker, L., & Baines, A. D. (2012). Learning in diversities of structures of social practice: Accounting for how, why and where people learn science. Human Development, 55(5–6), 269–284. doi: 10.1159/000345315
  • Brotman, J., & Moore, F. M. (2008). Girls and science: A review of four themes in the science education literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 971–1002. doi: 10.1002/tea.20241
  • Buck, G. A., Clark, V. L. P., Leslie-Pelecky, D., Lu, Y., & Cerda-Lizarraga, P. (2008). Examining the cognitive processes used by adolescent girls and women scientists in identifying science role models: A feminist approach. Science Education, 92(4), 688–707. doi: 10.1002/sce.20257
  • Carlone, H., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218. doi: 10.1002/tea.20237
  • Carsten Conner, L. D., & Danielson, J. (2016). Scientist role models in the classroom: How important is gender matching? International Journal of Science Education, 38(15), 2414–2430. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2016.1246780
  • Charney, J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Sofer, W., Neigeborn, L., Coletta, S., & Nemeroff, M. (2007). Cognitive apprenticeship in science through immersion in laboratory practices. International Journal of Science Education, 29(2), 195–213. doi: 10.1080/09500690600560985
  • Chawla, L., & Cushing, D. F. (2007). Education for strategic environmental behavior. Environmental Education Research, 13(4), 437–452. doi: 10.1080/13504620701581539
  • Collins, H. M. (1974). The TEA Set: Tacit knowledge and scientific networks. Social Studies of Science, 4(2), 165–185.
  • Collins, H. M. (2010). Tacit and explicit knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • De Vries, H., Elliott, M. N., Kanouse, D. E., & Teleki, S. S. (2008). Using Pooled Kappa to summarize interrater agreement across many items. Field Methods, 20(3), 272–282. doi: 10.1177/1525822X08317166
  • Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
  • Eberbach, C., & Crowley, K. (2009). From everyday to scientific observation: How children learn to observe the biologist’s world. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 39–68. doi: 10.3102/0034654308325899
  • Farmer, J., Knapp, D., & Benton, G. M. (2007). An elementary school environmental education field trip: Long-term effects on ecological and environmental knowledge and attitude development. The Journal of Environmental Education, 38(3), 33–42. doi: 10.3200/JOEE.38.3.33-42
  • Feldman, A., Divoll, K. A., & Rogan-Klyve, A. (2013). Becoming researchers: The participation of undergraduate and graduate students in scientific research groups. Science Education, 97(2), 218–243. doi: 10.1002/sce.21051
  • Finson, K. (2002). Drawing a scientist: What we do and do not know after fifty years of drawings. School Science and Mathematics, 102, 335–345. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb18217.x
  • Hsieh, H., & Shannon, S. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277–1288. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687
  • Kaplan, L. D. (1994). Woman as caretaker: An archetype that supports patriarchal militarism. Hypatia, 9(2), 123–133. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.1994.tb00436.x
  • Kohler, R. E. (2002). Landscapes and labscapes: Exploring the lab-field border in biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lave, E., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954–969. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954
  • Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Wiley.
  • Miller, P. H., Slawinski Blessing, J., & Schwartz, S. (2006). Gender differences in high-school students’ views about science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(4), 363–381. doi: 10.1080/09500690500277664
  • Mogk, D. W., & Goodwin, C. (2012). Learning in the field: Synthesis of research on thinking and learning in the geosciences. Geological Society of America Special Papers, 486, 131–163. doi: 10.1130/2012.2486(24)
  • National Research Council. (2015). Enhancing the effectiveness of team science. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Newton, L. D., & Newton, D. P. (1998). Primary children’s conceptions of science and the scientist: Is the impact of a national curriculum breaking down the stereotype? International Journal of Science Education, 20(9), 1137–1149. doi: 10.1080/0950069980200909
  • Norris, S. P. (1985). The philosophical basis of observation in science and science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(9), 817–833. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660220905
  • Palmberg, I. E., & Kuru, J. (2000). Outdoor activities as a basis for environmental responsibility. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31(4), 32–36. doi: 10.1080/00958960009598649
  • Sadler, T. D., Burgin, S., McKinney, L., & Ponjuan, L. (2010). Learning science through research apprenticeships: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), 235–256.
  • Stake, J. E., & Mares, K. R. (2001). Science enrichment programs for gifted high school girls and boys: Predictors of program impact on science confidence and motivation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(10), 1065–1088. doi: 10.1002/tea.10001
  • Streule, M. J., & Craig, L. E. (2016). Social learning theories—An important design consideration for geoscience fieldwork. Journal of Geoscience Education, 64(2), 101–107. doi: 10.5408/15-119.1
  • Wells, N. M., & Lekies, K. S. (2006). Nature and the life course: Pathways from childhood nature experiences to adult environmentalism. Children Youth and Environments, 16(1), 1–24.
  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.