Characterising patterns of engagement of different participants in a public STEM-based analysis project

References

• Archer, L., Dawson, E., DeWitt, J., Seakins, A., & Wong, B. (2015). Science capital’: A conceptual, methodological, and empirical argument for extending Bourdieusian notions of capital beyond the arts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52, 922–948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L., & De Witt, J. (2012). Science aspirations, capital, and family habitus: How families shape children’s engagement and identification with science. American Educational Research Journal, 49(5), 881–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L., De Witt, J., & Willis, B. (2014). Adolescent boys’ science aspirations: Masculinity, capital, and power. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ateh, C. M., & Charpentier, A. (2014). Sustaining student engagement in learning science. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 87, 259–263.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, M. (1995). Visual research methods. Retrieved from http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU11/SRU11.html
   Google Scholar
• Barriault, C. (1999). The science center learning experience: A visitor-based framework. The Informal Learning Review, 35(1), 14–16.
   Google Scholar
• Barriault, C., & Pearson, D. (2010). Assessing exhibits for learning in science centres: A practical tool. Visitor Studies, 13(1), 90–106.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, R., Rugen, L., & Woodfin, L. (2014). Leaders of their own learning. San Francisco: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1986). Forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood.
   Google Scholar
• Braund, M., & Reiss, M. (2004). Learning at museums and hands-on centres. Abingdon: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• British Educational Research Association. (2014). Ethical guidelines. Retrieved from https://www.bera.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/BERA-Ethical-Guidelines-2011.pdf?noredirect=1
   Google Scholar
• Campaign for Science and Engineering (2014). Improving Diversity in STEM. Campaign for Science and Engineering. London: Campaign for Science and Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, B., Dorph, R., & Reisman, L. (2015). Evidence & impact: Museum-managed STEM programs in out-of-school settings. Retrieved from http://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_089887.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Coffee, K. (2008). Cultural inclusion, exclusion and the formative roles of museums Museum. Museum Management and Curatorship, 23(3), 261–279.
   Google Scholar
• Day, S. P., & Bryce, T. G. K. (2013). The benefits of cooperative learning to socio-scientific discussion in secondary school science. International Journal of Science Education, 35(9), 1533–1560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vaus, D. (2001). Research design in social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• De Witte, K., & Rogge, N. (2012). Problem-based learning in secondary education: Evaluation by a randomized experiment. Hub Research Papers, University of Leuwen.
   Google Scholar
• Drury, J., & Stott, C. (2001). Bias as a research strategy in participant observation: The case of intergroup conflict. Field Methods, 13(1), 47–67.
   Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. (2014). Reconceptualising the nature of science for science education: Scientific knowledge, practices and other family categories. Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Essex, J. (2013). Behind the scenes at the Victorian pharmacy. Education in Chemistry, 1(May), 26–29.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2000). Learning from Museums. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., Moussouri, T., & Coulson, D. (1998). The effect of visitors’ agendas on Museum learning. Curator: The Museum Journal, 41(2), 107–120.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J. R., Park, B., & Lang, A. (2007). When available resources become negative resources the effects of cognitive overload on memory sensitivity and criterion bias. Communication Research, 34(3), 277–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2003). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Gold, R. (1958). Roles in sociological field observation. Social Forces, 36, 217–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2014). New directions for nature of science research. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 999–1021). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Istomina, Z. M. (1975). The development of voluntary memory in preschool-age children. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 13(4), 5–64.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7, 75–83.
   Google Scholar
• Kearsley, G., & Shneiderman, B. (1998). Engagement theory: A framework for technology-based teaching and learning. Educational Technology, 38(5), 20–23.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• King-Sears, M. E. (2008). Facts and fallacies: Differentiation and the general education curriculum for students with special educational needs. Support for Learning, 23(2), 55–62.
   Google Scholar
• Konecki, K. T. (2008). Touching and gesture exchange as an element of emotional bond construction. Application of visual sociology in the research on interaction between humans and animals. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(3), Art. 33. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0803337
   Google Scholar
• Moussouri, T. (2002). A context for the development of learning outcomes in museums, libraries and archives. Leicester: University of Leicester.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, H. L., & Toms, E. G. (2008). What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(6), 938–955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, S. (2007). Doing visual ethnography. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ponciano, L., & Brasileiro, F. (2015). ‘Finding volunteers’ engagement profiles in human computation for citizen science projects’. Human Computation, 1(2), 245–264.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1992). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectation and pupils’ intellectual development. Carmarthen: Crown House Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, K. E, & Cousins, E. B. (2009). The Sage international handbook on educational evaluation. California: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sheng, C.-W., & Chen, M. -S. (2012). A study of experience expectations of museum visitors. Tourism Management, 33(1), 53–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton-Salazar, R. D., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1995). Social capital and the reproduction of inequality: Information networks among Mexican-origin high school students. Sociology of Education, 68, 116–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, J. (1991). The long-term impact of interactive exhibits. International Journal of Science Education, 13(5), 521–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strike, K. A. (1990). The ethics of educational evaluation. In J. Millman, & L. Darling Hammond (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers (pp. 175–190). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, E. A. (1967). Evaluative research: Principles and practice in public service and social action programmes. New York: Bissell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Vaino, K., Holbrook, J., & Rannikmäe, M. (2012). Stimulating students’ intrinsic motivation for learning chemistry through the use of context-based learning modules. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13, 410–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, D. M. (2015). Public understanding of plant biology: Voices from the bottom of the garden. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 5(4), 339–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, D. A., & Wavell, C. (2001). Recent research on the impact of the school library resource centre on learning. The School Librarian, 49(3), 123–127.
   Google Scholar