Examining the use of drama to develop epistemological understanding about the nature of science: a collective case from experience in New Zealand and England

References

• Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). Examining the sources for our understandings about science: Enduring conflations and critical issues in research on nature of science in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 34(3) 53–374. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.629013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahams, I., & Braund, M. (2012). Performing science. Teaching Chemistry, physics and biology through drama. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27, 1–52. doi: 10.1080/03057269608560077
   Google Scholar
• Aitken, V. (2013). Dorothy Heathcote’s Mantle of the Expert approach to teaching and learning: A brief introduction. In D. Fraser, V. Aitken, & B. Whyte (Eds.), Connecting curriculum, linking learning (pp. 34–56). Wellington: NZCER Press.
   Google Scholar
• Akerson, V. L., & Abd-El Khalick, F. (2013). How should I know what scientists do?—I am just a kid. Fourth-Grade Students’ Conceptions of Nature of Science. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 82, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Akerson, V. L., & Donnelly, L. A. (2010). Teaching nature of science to K-2 students: What understandings can they attain? International Journal of Science Education, 32(1), 97–124. doi: 10.1080/09500690902717283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akerson, V.L., and Hanuscin, D.L. (2007). Teaching nature of science through inquiry: Results of a 3-year professional development program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(5), 653–680. doi: 10.1002/tea.20159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akerson, V. L., & Volrich, M. L. (2006). Teaching nature of science explicitly in a first-grade internship setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 377–394. doi: 10.1002/tea.20132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akerson, V. L., Weiland, I., Pongsanon, K., & Nargund-Joshi, V. (2010). Evidence-based strategies for teaching nature of science to young children. Journal of Kirsehir Education, 11(4), 61–78.
   Google Scholar
• Allchin, D. (2011). Evaluating knowledge of the nature of (whole) science. Science Education, 95(3), 518–542.
   Google Scholar
• Allchin, D. (2013). Teaching the nature of science: Perspectives and resources. Saint Paul: Ships Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allchin, D. (2014). From science studies to scientific literacy: A view from the classroom. Science and Education, 23(9) 1911–1932.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, D. (2014). What makes it science? Primary teacher practices that support learning about science. Research Information for Teachers, 2014 (2), 9–17.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, D., & Baskerville, D. (2016). Developing science capabilities through drama: Learning about the nature of science through a guided drama–science inquiry process. Research Information for Teachers, 2016 (1), 17–23.
   Google Scholar
• Aubusson, P. J., & Fogwill, S. (2006). Role play as analogical modeling in science. In P. J. Aubusson, A. G. Harrison, & S. M. Richie (Eds.), Metaphor and analogy in science education. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Barab, S., & Duffy, T. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In D. Jonassen & S. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence ErlBaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Baskerville, D., & Anderson, D. (2015). Investing in the pretend: A drama inquiry process to support learning about the nature of science. Research Information for Teachers, 2015 (1), 50–57.
   Google Scholar
• Bassey, M. (1999). Case study research in Educational Settings. Buckingham, MK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, G. (1984). Drama as education: An argument for placing drama the centre of the curriculum. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Bowell, P., & Heap, B. S. (2013). Planning process drama: Enriching teaching and learning. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Braund, M. (1999). Electric drama in science. School Science Review, 81(294), 35–41.
   Google Scholar
• Braund, M. (2015). Drama and learning science: An empty space? British Educational Research Journal, 41(1), 102–121. doi: 10.1002/berj.3130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, B. (2002). Ecological understanding 1: Ways of experiencing photosynthesis. International Journal of Science Education, 24(7), 681–699. doi: 10.1080/09500690110098868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craciun, D. (2010). Role-playing as a creative method in science education. Journal of Science and Arts, 1(10), 175–182.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, B. (2014). From inquiry to scientific practices in the science classroom. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. II, pp. 529–556). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2014). The national curriculum in England. Framework document. London: Crown Copyright.
   Google Scholar
• Dorion, K. (2009) Science through drama: A multiple case exploration of the characterististcs of drama activities in secondary science lessons. International Journal of Science Education 31(16) 2247–2270 doi: 10.1080/09500690802712699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people's images of science. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32, 268–291. doi: 10.3102/0091732X07309371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Education Review Office. (2010). Science in years 5 to 8: Capable and competent teaching. Retrieved from http://www.ero.govt.nz/National-Reports/Science-in-Years-5-to-8-Capable-and-Competent-Teaching-May-2010/Overview
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, M. (1997). The art of drama teaching. London: David Fulton.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, M. J., & Forman, E. A. (2006). Redefining disciplinary learning in classroom contexts. Review of Research in Education, 30(1), 1–32. doi: 10.3102/0091732X030001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlen, W. (2011). Why is learning science important in primary schools? In W. Harlen (Ed.), ASE guide to primary science Education. Hatfield: Association of Science Education.
   Google Scholar
• Harlen, W. (2012). Scientific inquiry. In J. Oversby (Ed.), ASE guide to research in science education. Hatfield: Association of Science Education.
   Google Scholar
• Heathcote, D. (1984). Collected writings on education and drama edited by Johnson and O’Neill. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. (2009). Teaching and learning about science. Language, theories, methods, history, traditions and values. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, D., and Wong, S.L. (2014). From the horse’s mouth: Why scientists’ views are crucial to nature of science understanding. International Journal of Science Education 36(16), 2639–2665. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2014.927936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. (1999). Kidney role-plays. School Science Review, 80(292), 93–97.
   Google Scholar
• Kampourakis, K. (2016). The “general aspects” conceptualization as a pragmatic and effective means to introducing students to nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(5), 667–682.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. (2007). Nature of Science: Past, present and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on Science Education (pp. 831–880). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaumn Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G. (2004). Syntax of nature of science within inquiry and science instruction. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science (pp. 301–317). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2014). Research on teaching and learning of nature of science. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Volume II) (pp. 600–620). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, D., & Duggan, A. (2016). Empowering learners through a dramatic enquiry. Paper presented at British Educational research Association Annual Conference. September 14th 2016. Leeds University, UK.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, D., & Precious, W. (2015). Dramatic science. Inspiring ideas for (5–11 year olds) learning science. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McSharry, G., & Jones, S. (2000). Role play in science teaching and learning. School Science Review, 82(298), 73–59.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (2001). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C. (2006). Case and situational analysis. In T. M. S. Evans & D. Handelman (Eds.), The Manchester school. Practice and ethnographic praxis in anthropology. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science Education: Practices, Crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165
   Google Scholar
• Neelands, J., & Goode, T. (2000). Structuring drama work: A handbook of available forms in theatre and drama. Cambridge: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ødegaard, M. (2003). Dramatic science. A critical review of drama in science education. Studies in Science Education, 39(1), 75–101. doi: 10.1080/03057260308560196
   Google Scholar
• Ødegaard, M., & Oiestad, P. A. (2002). ‘Gen-gangere’: Exploring the borderland of knowledge, biotechnology and Henrik Ibsen's dramatic world. NJ (Drama Australia Journal), 26, 91–101.
   Google Scholar
• Ofsted. (2011). Successful science. An evaluation of science education in England 2007-2010. Manchester: Crown Copyright.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. (2014). Teaching scientific practices: Meeting the challenge of change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 177–196. doi: 10.1007/s10972-014-9384-1
   Google Scholar
• Rowell, P., & Ebbers, M. (2004). Shaping school science: Competing discourses in an inquiry-based elementary program. International Journal of Science Education, 26(8), 915–934. doi: 10.1080/1468181032000158345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. New York, NY: The Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tala, S., & Vesterinen, V. (2015). Nature of science contextualized: Studying nature of science with scientists. Science and Education, 24, 435–457. doi: 10.1007/s11191-014-9738-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. (2011). How to do your case study. A guide for students and researchers. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thrupp, M., & White, M. (2013). Research, analysis and insight into national standards. (RAINS) project final report: National standards and the damage done. Retrieved from http://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/handle/10289/8394
   Google Scholar
• Tucker-Raymond, E., Varelas, M., Pappas, C.C., Korzh, A., & Wentland, A. (2007). “They probably aren’t named Rachel”: young children’s scientist identities as emergent multimodal narratives. Cultural Studies of Science Education 1(3), 559–592. doi: 10.1007/s11422-006-9017-x
   Google Scholar
• Tvieta, J. (1996). The drama model of electricity. Paper delivered to the 8th Symposium of the international organisation of science and Technology Education, Edmonton, University of Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Varelas, M., Pappas, C., Tucker-Raymond, E., Kane, J., Hankes, J., Ortiz, I., & Keblawe-Sharmah, N. (2009). Drama activities as ideational resources for primary‐grade children in urban science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 302–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, C. C., & Anderson, C. (2004). ‘Snails are science’: Creating context for science inquiry and writing through process drama. Youth Theatre Journal, 18(1), 68–86. doi: 10.1080/08929092.2004.10012565
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar