References
- Archer, L., Dawson, E., DeWitt, J., Seakins, A., & Wong, B. (2015). “Science capital”: A conceptual, methodological, and empirical argument for extending bourdieusian notions of capital beyond the arts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(7), 922–948. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21227
- Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2012). Science aspirations, capital, and family habitus: How families shape children’s engagement and identification with science. American Educational Research Journal, 49(5), 881–908. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211433290
- Association of Independent Museums. (2016). Taking charge - Evaluating the evidence: The impact of charging or not for admissions on museums. https://www.aim-museums.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Executive-Summary-Taking-Charge-%E2%80%93-Evaluating-the-Evidence-The-Impact-of-Charging-or-Not-for-Admissions-on-Museums.pdf
- Bultitude, K. (2014). Science festivals: Do they succeed in reaching beyond the “already engaged”? Journal of Science Communication, 13(4), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.13040301
- Canovan, C. (2019). “Going to these events truly opens your eyes”. Perceptions of science and science careers following a family visit to a science festival. Journal of Science Communication, 18(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.18020201
- DeWitt, J., Archer, L., & Mau, A. (2016). Dimensions of science capital: Exploring its potential for understanding students’ science participation. International Journal of Science Education, 38(16), 2431–2449. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1248520
- Dilenschneider, C. (2015). How free admission really affects museum attendance. https://www.colleendilen.com/2015/08/12/how-free-admission-really-affects-museum-attendance-data/
- Feinstein, N. W., & Meshoulam, D. (2014). Science for what public? Addressing equity in American science museums and science centers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(3), 368–394. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21130
- Kennedy, E. B., Jensen, E. A., & Verbeke, M. (2018). Preaching to the scientifically converted: Evaluating inclusivity in science festival audiences. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 8(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2017.1371356
- Kirchberg, V. (1998). Entrance fees as a subjective barrier to visiting museums. Journal of Cultural Economics, 22(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007452808105
- Martin, A. (2002). The impact of free entry to museums. Cultural Trends, 12(47), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/09548960209390329
- McCarthy, & King Marketing. (n.d.). What is a good direct mail response rate? https://www.mccarthyandking.com/direct-marketing-tutorials/learning-direct-mail-response-rates.
- Nielsen, K., Gathings, M. J., & Peterman, K. (2019). New, not different: Data-driven perspectives on science festival audiences. Science Communication, 41(2), 254–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547019832312
- Rose, K. M., Korzekwa, K., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., & Heisler, L. (2017). Engaging the public at a science festival. Science Communication, 39(2), 250–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547017697981
- Science Festival Alliance. (2017). 2017 Annual report. https://sciencefestivals.org/resource/2017-annual-report/
- UK Science Festivals Network. (2018). UKSFN 2018 infographic. http://sciencefestivals.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/UKSFN-2018-infographic.pdf