References
- Albagli, S., Maciel, M. L., & Abdo, A. H. (2015). Open science, open issues. IBICT.
- Allchin, D. (2014). From science studies to scientific literacy: A view from the classroom. Science and Education, 23(9), 1911–1932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9672-8
- Archer-Bradshaw, R. E. (2017). Teaching for scientific literacy? An examination of instructional practices in secondary schools in Barbados. Research in Science Education, 47(1), 67–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9490-x
- Ballard, H. L., Dixon, C. G. H., & Harris, E. M. (2017). Youth-focused citizen science: Examining the role of environmental science learning and agency for conservation. Biological Conservation, 208, 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.024
- Bonney, R., Ballard, H., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Phillips, T., Shirk, J., & Wilderman, C. C. (2009, July). Public participation in scientific research: Defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report (pp. 1–58).
- Bonney, R., Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg, K. V., & Shirk, J. (2009). Citizen science: A developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience, 59(11), 977–984. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9
- Bonney, R., Phillips, T. B., Ballard, H. L., & Enck, J. W. (2016). Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public Understanding of Science, 25(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515607406
- Börner, K., & Polley, D. E. (2014). Visualization insight- a practical guide to making sense of data. MIT Press.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Bromme, R., & Goldman, S. R. (2014). The public’s Bounded understanding of science. Educational Psychologist, 49(2), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.921572
- Crawford, B. (2013). Authentic science. In R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science education (pp. 1–3). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6165-0_144-2
- Dunwoody, S. (2016). Communicating uncertainty in our mediated world: A preface. Communications, 41(3), 231–237. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2016-0013
- Feinstein, N. (2011). Salvaging science literacy. Science Education, 95(1), 168–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20414
- Funk, C., & Goo, S. K. (2015). A look at what the public knows and does not know about science. Pew Research Center.
- Funk, C., Gottfried, J., & Mitchell, A. (2017). Science news and information today. Pew Research Center.
- Golumbic, Y. N. (2015). What makes Citizen Science projects successful, and what can we learn from them for future projects? Technion Citizen Science Project (TCSP) Report (pp. 1–56).
- Golumbic, Y. N., Baram-Tsabari, A., & Koichu, B. (2019). Engagement and communication features of scientifically successful citizen science projects. Environmental Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1687101
- Golumbic, Y. N., Fishbain, B., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2019). User centered design of a citizen science air quality monitoring project. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2019.1597314
- Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2011). Applied thematic analysis. SAGE Publications Inc.
- Huxster, J. K., Slater, M. H., Leddington, J., Lopiccolo, V., Bergman, J., Jones, M., McGlynn, C., Diaz, N., Aspinall, N., Bresticker, J., & Hopkins, M. (2018). Understanding “understanding” in public understanding of science. Public Understanding of Science, 27(7), 756–771. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662517735429
- Jordan, R., Crall, A., Gray, S., Phillips, T., & Mellor, D. (2015). Citizen science as a distinct field of inquiry. BioScience, 65(2), 208–211. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu217
- Kahan, D. M. (2017). ‘Ordinary science intelligence’: A science-comprehension measure for study of risk and science communication, with notes on evolution and climate change. Journal of Risk Research, 20(8), 995–1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2016.1148067
- Landrum, A. R., Hallman, W. K., & Jamieson, K. H. (2019). Examining the impact of expert voices: Communicating the scientific consensus on genetically-modified organisms. Environmental Communication, 13(1), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1502201
- Larson, H. J. (2018). Politics and public trust shape vaccine risk perceptions. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0331-6
- Lee, S., Kim, S., Hung, Y., Lam, H., Kang, Y., & Yi, J. S. (2016). How do people make sense of unfamiliar visualizations? A grounded model of novice’s information visualization sensemaking. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 22(1), 499–508. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467195.
- Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., & Cook, J. (2017). Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JARMAC.2017.07.008
- Linder, C., Östman, L., & Wickman, O. (Eds.). (2007). Promoting scientific literacy: Science education research in transaction. Linnaeus.
- Mahr, D., Göbel, C., Irwin, A., & Vohland, K. (2018). Watching or being watched: Enhancing productive discussion between the citizen sciences, the social sciences, and the humanities. In S. Hecker, M. Haklay, A. Bowser, Z. Makuch, J. Vogel, & A. Bonn (Eds.), Citizen science: Innovation in open science, society and policy (pp. 99–109). UCL Press.
- Masters, K., Oh, E. Y., Cox, J., Simmons, B., Lintott, C., Graham, G., Greenhill A., & Holmes, K. (2016). Science learning via participation in online citizen science. Journal of Science Communication, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.22323/2.15030207
- McCrudden, M. T., & Rapp, D. N. (2017). How visual displays affect cognitive processing. Educational Psychology Review, 29(3), 623–639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9342-2
- Murcia, K. (2009). Re-thinking the development of scientific literacy through a rope metaphor. Research in Science Education, 39(2), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9081-1
- National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine. (2017). Communicating science effectively. https://doi.org/10.17226/23674
- National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine. (2016). Science literacy: Concepts, contexts, and consequences (C. E. Snow & K. A. Dibner, Eds.). https://doi.org/10.17226/23595
- National Research Council. (2014). Developing assessments for the next generation science standards. https://doi.org/10.17226/18409
- National Science Board. (2018). Science and engineering indicators 2018.
- Orr, D., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2018). Science and politics in the polio vaccination debate on Facebook : A mixed-methods approach to public engagement in a acience-based dialogue. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 19(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.1500
- Peters, M. A. (2018). Education in a post-truth world. In M. A. Peters, S. Rider, M. Hyvönen, & T. Besley (Eds.), Post-truth, fake news (pp. 145–150). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8013-5_12
- Ryder, J. (2001). Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy. Studies in Science Education, 36(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260108560166
- Scharrer, L., Rupieper, Y., Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2017). When science becomes too easy: Science popularization inclines laypeople to underrate their dependence on experts. Public Understanding of Science, 26(8), 1003–1018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516680311
- Shauli, S., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2018). The usefulness of science knowledge for parents of hearing-impaired children. Public Understanding of Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662518772503
- Soleri, D., Long, J. W., Ramirez-Andreotta, M., Eitemiller, R. D., & Pandya, R. (2016). Finding pathways to more equitable and meaningful public-scientist partnerships. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 1(1), 9–11. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.46
- Tufte, E. (2006). Beautiful evidence. Graphics press.
- Whitmarsh, L. (2011). Scepticism and uncertainty about climate change: Dimensions, determinants and change over time. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 690–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2011.01.016
- Wynne, B. (1991). Knowledges in context. Science, Technology & Human Values, 16(1), 111–121. doi: 10.1177/016224399101600108