Why scientists agree to participate in science festivals: evidence from South Africa

References

• Alpert, C. L. (2018). So you want to share your science … connecting to the world of informal science learning. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 58(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icy008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altay, S., & Lakhlifi, C. (2020). Are science festivals a good place to discuss heated topics? JCOM, 19(01), A07. https://jcom.sissa.it/archive/19/01/JCOM_1901_2020_A07 https://doi.org/10.22323/2.19010207
   Google Scholar
• Bakuwa, J. (2015). Public understanding of global climate change in Malawi: An investigation of factors influencing perceptions, attitudes and beliefs about global climate change [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Bentley, P., & Kyvik, S. (2011). Academic staff and public communication: A survey of popular science publishing across 13 countries. Public Understanding of Science, 20(1), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510384461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besley, J. C., Oh, S. H., & Nisbet, M. (2013). Predicting scientists’ participation in public life. Public Understanding of Science, 22(8), 971–987. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662512459315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besley, J. C., O’Hara, K., & Dudo, A. (2019). Strategic science communication as planned behavior: Understanding scientists’ willingness to choose specific tactics. PLoS ONE, 14(10), e0224039. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, J. (2012, September 19). Where are all the black women in science? New Scientist, 215(2883), 50–51. https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn22258-where-are-all-the-black-women-in-science/ https://doi.org/10.1016/S0262-4079(12)62463-4
   Google Scholar
• Boyette, T., & Ramsey, J. (2019). Does the messenger matter? Studying the impacts of scientists and engineers interacting with public audiences at science festival events. JCOM, 18(02), A02. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.18020202
   Google Scholar
• Braun, M., Starkbaum, J., & Dabrock, P. (2015). Safe and sound? Scientists’ understandings of public engagement in emerging biotechnologies. PLOS ONE, 10(12), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, N., McPhee, J., & Jensen, E. (2011). University engagement in festivals: Top tips and case studies. National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement (NCCPE). https://www.publicengagement.ac.uk/sites/default/files/publication/festivals_guides_and_top_tips_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bultitude, K. (2014). Science festivals: Do they succeed in reaching beyond the ‘already engaged’? JCOM, 13(4), C01. https://jcom.sissa.it/archive/13/04/JCOM_1304_2014_C01 https://doi.org/10.22323/2.13040301
   Google Scholar
• Bultitude, K., McDonald, D., & Custead, S. (2011). The rise and rise of science festivals: An international review of organised events to celebrate science. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 1(2), 165–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2011.588851
   Google Scholar
• Canovan, C. (2019). ‘Going to these events truly opens your eyes’. Perceptions of science and science careers following a family visit to a science festival. JCOM, 18(2), A01. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.18020201
   Google Scholar
• Carr, J., Whitelegg, E., Holliman, R., Scanlon, E., & Hodgson, B. (2009). Investigating gendered representations of scientists, technologists, engineers and mathematicians on UK children’s television. In R. Holliman, E. Whitelegg, E. Scanlon, S. Smidt, & J. Thomas (Eds.), Investigating science communication in the information age: Implications for public engagement and popular media (pp. 237–252). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Casini, S., & Neresini, F. (2012). Behind closed doors: Scientists’ and science communicators’ discourses on science in society. A study across European research institutions. Technoscienza, 3(2), 37–62. http://www.tecnoscienza.net/index.php/tsj/article/view/113
   Google Scholar
• Cerrato, S., Daelli, V., Pertot, H., & Puccioni, O. (2018). The public-engaged scientists: Motivations, enablers and barriers. Research for All, 2(2), 313–322. https://doi.org/10.18546/RFA.02.2.09
   Google Scholar
• Crettaz von Roten, F. (2011). Gender differences in scientists’ public outreach and engagement activities. Science Communication, 33(1), 52–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547010378658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, S. (2008). Constructing communication: Talking to scientists about talking to the public. Science Communication, 29(4), 413–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008316222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DST – Department of Science and Technology. (2015). Science engagement strategy. Government Printers.
   Google Scholar
• DST – Department of Science and Technology. (2019). White paper on science, Technology and innovation. Government Printers.
   Google Scholar
• Dudo, A. (2012). Toward a model of scientists’ public communication activity: The case of biomedical researchers. Science Communication, 35(4), 476–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012460845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudo, A., & Besley, J. C. (2016). Scientists’ prioritization of communication objectives for public engagement. PLOS ONE, 11(12), e0148867. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148867
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dunwoody, S., Brossard, D., & Dudo, A. (2009). Socialization or rewards? Predicting US scientist-media interactions. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(2), 299–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900908600203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Plessis, H. (2017). Politics of science communication in South Africa. JCOM, 16(3), A03. https://jcom.sissa.it/archive/16/03/JCOM_1603_2017_A03 https://doi.org/10.22323/2.16030203
   Google Scholar
• Durant, J. (2013). The role of science festivals. PNAS, 110(8), 2681. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1300182110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecklund, E. H., James, S. A., & Lincoln, A. E. (2012). How academic biologists and physicists view science outreach. PLOS ONE, 7(5), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, G. T. H., & De Wet, T. (2020). The classification of South Africa’s mixed-heritage peoples 1910–2011: A century of conflation, contradiction, containment, and contention. In Z. Rocha & P. Aspinall (Eds.), The palgrave international handbook of mixed racial and ethnic classification. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22874-3_23
   Google Scholar
• Entradas, M., & Bauer, M. M. (2016). Mobilisation for public engagement: Benchmarking the practices of research institutes. Public Understanding of Science, 26(5), 771–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516633834
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fahy, D. (2015). The new celebrity scientists. Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Fogg-Rogers, L., Bay, J. L., Burgess, H., & Purdy, S. C. (2015). “Knowledge is power”: A mixed-methods study exploring adult audience preferences for engagement and learning formats over 3 years of a health science festival. Science Communication, 37(4), 419–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547015585006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grand, A., Davies, G., Holliman, R., & Adams, A. (2015). Mapping public engagement with research in a UK university. PLOS ONE, 10(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunter, C. (2013). Science: It's a role model thing. Genome Biology, 14(2), 105. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2013-14-2-105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, E. R., & Post-Kramer, P. (1987). Black math and science majors: Why so few? Career Development Quarterly, 35(3), 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.1987.tb00915.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann, S. D., Adelman, R. M., Bodford, J. E., Graudejus, O., Okun, M. A., & Kwan, V. S. Y. (2016). The effects of a female role model on academic performance and persistence of women in STEM courses. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 38(5), 258–268. 10.1080/01973533.2016.1209757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, O. W., Pettus, C., & Hedin, B. A. (1990). Three studies of factors affecting the attitudes of blacks and females toward the pursuit of science and science-related careers. Journal of Research in Science and Technology, 27(4), 289–314. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660270403
   Google Scholar
• Holliman, R., & Jensen, E. (2009). (In)authentic sciences and (im)partial publics: (Re)constructing the science outreach and public engagement agenda. In R. Holliman, E. Whitelegg, E. Scanlon, S. Smidt, & J. Thomas (Eds.), Investigating science communication in the information Age: Implications for public engagement and popular media (pp. 35–52). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Idowu-Onibokun, B. (2017, February 24). Hidden figures is just the start – here’s how to inspire more black scientists. The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/feb/24/hidden-figures-tommorrow-black-scientists-education
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, E., & Buckley, N. (2014). Why people attend science festivals: Interests, motivations and self-reported benefits of public engagement with research. Public Understanding of Science, 23(5), 557–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662512458624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, E., & Holliman, R. (2016). Norms and values in UK science engagement practice. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 6(1), 68–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2014.995743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, E., & Laurie, C. (2016). Doing real research: A practical guide to social research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, E. A., & Gerber, A. (2020). Evidence-based science communication. Frontiers in Communication, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00078
   Google Scholar
• Joubert, M. (2007). South Africa: Building capacity. In M. W. Bauer & M. Bucchi (Eds.), Journalism, science and society (pp. 251–254). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Joubert, M. (2018). Country-specific factors that compel South African scientists to engage with public audiences. JCOM, 17(04), C04. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.17040304
   Google Scholar
• Joubert, M., & Guenther, L. (2017). In the footsteps of Einstein, Sagan and Barnard: Identifying South Africa’s most visible scientists. South African Journal of Science, 113(11/12), https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2017/20170033
   Google Scholar
• Joubert, M., & Mkansi, S. (2020). South Africa: Science communication throughout turbulent times. In T. Gascoigne, B. Schiele, J. Leach, M. Riedlinger, B. Lewenstein, L. Massarani, & P. Broks (Eds.), Communicating science: A global perspective (pp. 771–800). Australian National University Press. http://doi.org/10.22459/CS.2020
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, E. B., Jensen, E. A., & Verbeke, M. (2018). Preaching to the scientifically converted: Evaluating inclusivity in science festival audiences. International Journal of Science Education Part B: Communication & Engagement, 8(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2017.1371356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh, E. J., Dunwoody, S., Brossard, D., & Allgaier, J. (2016). Mapping neuroscientists’ perception of the nature and effects of public visibility. Science Communication, 38(2), 170–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547016635180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreimer, P., Levin, L., & Jensen, P. (2011). Popularization by Argentine researchers: The activities and motivations of CONICET scientists. Public Understanding of Science, 20(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510383924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D. N. (2011, April 1). Under-represented and underserved: Why minority role models matter in STEM. Scientific American. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/under-represented-and-underserved-why-minority-role-models-matter-in-stem/
   Google Scholar
• Lelliott, A. D. (2007). Learning about astronomy: A case study exploring how grade 7 and 8 students experience sites of informal learning in South Africa [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of the Witwatersrand.
   Google Scholar
• Llorente, C., Revuelta, G., Carrió, M., & Porta, M. (2019). Scientists’ opinions and attitudes towards citizens’ understanding of science and their role in public engagement activities. PLoS ONE, 14(11), e0224262. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzini, S. (2003). Effective communication of science in a culturally diverse society. Science Communication, 25(2), 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547003259432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margarida Sardo, A., & Grand, A. (2016). Science in culture: Audiences’ perspective on engaging with science at a summer festival. Science Communication, 38(2), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547016632537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-Sempere, M. J., Garzón-García, B., & Rey-Rocha, J. (2008). Scientists’ motivation to communicate science and technology to the public: Surveying participants at the Madrid science fair. Public Understanding of Science, 17(3), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506067660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matshabane, O. (2016). Exploring the influence of role models on the career development process of school-going adolescents from a low-income community in South Africa. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Stellenbosch University. https://scholar.sun.ac.za/handle/10019.1/100356
   Google Scholar
• McCann, B. M., Cramer, C. B., & Taylor, L. G. (2015). Assessing the impact of education and outreach activities on research scientists. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 19(1), 65–78. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1061877.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mizumachi, E., Matsuda, K., & Kano, K. (2011). Scientists’ attitudes toward a dialogue with the public: A study using “science cafes”. JCOM, 10(4), E1–E11. https://jcom.sissa.it/sites/default/files/documents/Jcom1004%282011%29A02.pdf https://doi.org/10.22323/2.10040202
   Google Scholar
• Moss, A., Jensen, E., & Gusset, M. (2015). Evaluating the contribution of zoos and aquariums to Aichi Biodiversity Target 1. Conservation Biology, 29(2), 537–544. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolin, J., Bragesjö, F., & Kasperowski, D. (2006). Science festivals and weeks as spaces for OPUS. In U. Felt (Ed.), O.P.U.S. Optimising public understanding of science and technology (pp. 271–282). University of Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, H. P. (2014). Scientists as public experts: Expectations and responsibilities. In M. Bucchi & B. Trench (Eds.), Routledge handbook of public communication of science and technology (2nd ed., pp. 70–82). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Poliakoff, E., & Webb, T. L. (2007). What factors predict scientists’ intentions to participate in public engagement of science activities? Science Communication, 29(2), 242–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547007308009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, J., Williams, C., Wainwright, S., & Cribb, A. (2012). On being a (modern) scientist: Risks of public engagement in the UK interspecies embryo debate. New Genetics and Society, 31(4), 408–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2012.687138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quimby, J. L., & DeSantis, A. M. (2006). The influence of role models on women’s career choices. The Career Development Quarterly, 54(4), 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2006.tb00195.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riise, J., & Alfonsi, L. (2014). From liquid nitrogen to public engagement and city planning: The changing role of science events. JCOM, 13(4), CO3. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.13040303
   Google Scholar
• Rose, K. M., Korzekwa, K., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., & Heisler, L. (2017). Engaging the public at a science festival: Findings from a panel on human gene editing. Science Communication, 39(2), 250–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547017697981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scifest Africa. (2019). Scifest Africa 2018 Report. Unpublished internal report. Grahamstown Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Scifest Africa. (2020). Scifest Africa 2019 Report. Unpublished internal report. Grahamstown Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Sekund, E. (2019). Facts and Festivals: Scientists’ engagement in communication and science outreach [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Borås. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1396178/FULLTEXT01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Selvakumar, M., & Storksdieck, M. (2013). Portal to the public: Museum educators collaborating with scientists to engage museum visitors with current science. Curator, 56(1), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/cura.12007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• STATS SA. (2019). Statistical Release: Mid-year population estimates 2019. http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/P0302/P03022019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Storksdieck, M., Stylinski, C., & Canzoneri, N. (2017). The impact of portal to the public: Creating an infrastructure for engaging scientists in informal science education. University of Maryland Center. Oregon State University for Environmental Science. https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/technical_reports/dv140102j
   Google Scholar
• The Royal Society. (2006). Science communication excellence: Survey of factors affecting science communication by scientists and engineers. The Royal Society, UK. https://royalsociety.org/~/media/Royal_Society_Content/policy/publications/2006/1111111395.pdf
   Google Scholar
• TNS-BMRB. (2015). Factors affecting public engagement by researchers: A study on behalf of a Consortium of UK public research funders. Policy Studies Institute, London. https://wellcome.ac.uk/sites/default/files/wtp060033_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Torres-Albero, C., Fernandez-Esquinas, M., Rey-Rocha, J., & Martín-Sempere, M. J. (2011). Dissemination practices in the Spanish research system: Scientists trapped in a golden cage. Public Understanding of Science, 20(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510382361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trench, B. (2008). Towards an analytical framework of science communication models. In D. Cheng, M. Claessens, T. Gascoigne, J. Metcalfe, B. Schiele, & S. Shi (Eds.), Communicating science in social contexts (pp. 119–135). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Auweraert, A. (2008). De onderzoeker als communicator: Een kwalitatief en verkennend onderzoek naar de determinanten van wetenschapscommunicatiegedrag. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Antwerp. https://edepot.wur.nl/122003
   Google Scholar
• Wiehe, B. (2014). When science makes us who we are: Known and speculative impacts of science festivals. JCOM, 13(04), C02. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.13040302
   Google Scholar
• Wiehe, B. (2018). 2017 Annual Report. Science Festival Alliance. https://sciencefestivals.org/resource/2017-annual-report/
   Google Scholar
• Wilmot, B. (2001). Sasol SciFest: Promoting a “culture” of science in South Africa in a festive way. South African Museums Association Bulletin, 26(2), 63–64. https://journals.co.za/doi/10.10520/EJC152381
   Google Scholar