References
- Amarasekara, I., & Grant, W. J. (2019). Exploring the YouTube science communication gender gap: A sentiment analysis. Public Understanding of Science, 28(1), 68–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662518786654
- Archer, L., Dawson, E., DeWitt, J., Seakins, A., & Wong, B. (2015). Science capital: A conceptual, methodological, and empirical argument for extending bourdieusian notions of capital beyond the arts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(7), 922–948. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21227
- Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2010). “Doing” science versus “being” a scientist: Examining 10/11-year-old schoolchildren’s constructions of science through the lens of identity. Science Education, 94(4), 617–639. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20399
- Bengtssen, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001
- Bourdieu, P. (1987). Bordieu: What makes a social class?: On the theoretical and practical existence of groups. Berkeley Journal of Sociology: A Critical Review, 32, 1–17.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Bultitude, K. (2014). Science festivals: Do they succeed in reaching beyond the ‘already engaged’? Journal of Science Communication, 13((04|4)), C01. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22323/2.13040301
- Calhoun, C. (2016). Brexit is a mutiny against the cosmopolitan elite. New Perspectives Quarterly, 33(3), 50–58.
- Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237
- Chisholm, H. (Ed.) (1911). “Faraday, Michael”. Encyclopædia Britannica. 10(11th ed.). Cambridge University Press 173–175. The 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica.
- Couper, M., Traugott, M., & Lamias, M. (2002). Web survey design and administration. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65(2), 230–253. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/322199
- Dawson, E. (2014a). Equity in informal science education: Developing an access and equity framework for science museums and science centres. Studies in Science Education, 50(2), 209–247. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2014.957558
- Dawson, E. (2014b). “Not designed for us”: How science museums and science centers socially exclude low-income, minority ethnic groups. Science Education, 98(6), 981–1008. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21133
- Dawson, E. (2018). Reimagining publics and (non) participation: Exploring exclusion from science communication through the experiences of low-income, minority ethnic groups. Public Understanding of Science, 27(7), 772–786. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662517750072
- De Lara, A., García-Avilés, J. A., & Revuelta, G. (2017). Online video on climate change: A comparison between television and web formats. Journal of Science Communication, 16(1), A04. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22323/2.16010204
- Dhingra, K. (2006). Science on television: Storytelling, learning and citizenship. Studies in Science Education, 42(1), 89–123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260608560221
- Fogg-Rogers, L., Bay, J., Burgess, H., & Purdy, S. C. (2015). “Knowledge is power”: A mixed-methods study exploring adult audience preferences for engagement and learning formats over 3 years of a health science festival. Science Communication, 37(4), 419–451. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547015585006
- Gjersoe, N. L., & Hood, B. (2013). Changing children’s understanding of the brain: A longitudinal study of the Royal Institution Christmas Lectures as a measure of public engagement. PLoS ONE, 8(11), e80928. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080928
- Grand, A., & Sardo, A. M. (2017). What works in the field? Evaluating informal science events. Frontiers in Communication, 2(22). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2017.00022
- Groves, R. M., Fowler, F. J., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2004). ‘Survey methodology’, Wiley series in survey methodology, 1st ed. WileyInterscience.
- Ipsos MORI. (2014). Public attitudes to science 2014. Economic and Social Research Council.
- James, F. A. J. L. (2002). ‘Never talk about science, show it to them’: The lecture theatre of the Royal Institution. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 27(3), 225–229. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1179/030801802225003178
- Kennedy, E. B., Jensen, E. A., & Verbeke, M. (2018). Preaching to the scientifically converted: Evaluating inclusivity in science festival audiences. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 8(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2017.1371356
- McCallie, E., Bell, L., Lohwater, T., Falk, J. H., Lehr, J. L., Lewenstein, B. V., Needham, C., & Wiehe, B. (2009). Many experts, many audiences: Public engagement with science and informal science education. Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education.
- Miller, J. D., Augenbraun, E., Schulhof, J., & Kimmel, L. G. (2006). Adult science learning from local television newscasts. Science Communication, 28(2), 216–242. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547006294461
- Mulder, H. A. J., Longnecker, N., & Davis, L. S. (2008). The state of science communication programs at universities around the world. Science Communication, 30(2), 277–287. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008324878
- Ofcom. (2019). Media nations: UK 2019.
- Peer, L., & Ksiazek, T. B. (2011). YouTube and the challenge to journalism: New standards for news videos online. Journalism Studies, 12(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2010.511951
- Ri online. (2018). Past series of the iconic Christmas Lectures available for new generations. https://www.rigb.org/about/news/spring-2018/christmas-lectures-archive-announcement
- Ri online. (2019). About the Christmas Lectures. https://www.rigb.org/christmas-lectures/about
- Ri online. (2020). The Ri and diversity. https://www.rigb.org/about/news/autumn-2020/ri-diversity-statement
- Ri online. (2021). Christmas Lectures Tickets. https://www.rigb.org/christmas-lectures/2020-planet-earth-a-usersguide/tickets
- Sardo, M., Little, H., & Fogg Rogers, L. (2019). Evaluation of the Royal Institution Christmas Lectures. https://uwe.worktribe.com/record.jx?recordid=847143
- Standard Eurobarometer. (2014). In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research.
- Sugimoto, C. R., Thelwall, M., Larivière, V., Tsou, A., Mongeon, P., & Macaluso, B. (2013). Scientists popularizing science: Characteristics and impact of TED talk presenters. PloS ONE, 8(4), e62403. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062403
- Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information, 13(2), 65–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847401300204
- Technology, Entertainment and Design. (2020). Our organization. https://www.ted.com/about/our-organization
- Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
- Tsou, A., Thelwall, M., Mongeon, P., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2014). A community of curious souls: An analysis of commenting behavior on TED talks videos. PloS ONE, 9(4), e93609. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093609
- Welbourne, D. J., & Grant, W. J. (2016). Science communication on YouTube: Factors that affect channel and video popularity. Public Understanding of Science, 25(6), 706–718. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515572068
- Wellcome Trust. (2016). Cultural and informal science experiences. https://wellcome.ac.uk/sites/default/files/informal-science-wellcome-apr16.pdf
- Whitelegg, E., Holliman, R., Carr, J., Scanlon, E., & Hodgson, B. (2008). (In)visible witnesses: Investigating gendered representations of scientists, technologists, engineers and mathematicians on UK children’s television. UK Resource Centre for Women in Science, Engineering and Technology.
- Wilkinson, C., & Sardo, M. (2013). Killer facts for informal learning. http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/Education-resources/Education-and-learning/News/2013/WTP053966.htm