References
- Aikenhead, G. S. (2003). Review of research on humanistic perspectives in science curricula. European Science Education Research Association (ESERA) conference, Nordwijkerhout, Netherlands, 19–23 August 2003. Noordwijkerhout, Netherlands.
- Allum, N., Sturgis, P., Tabourazi, D., & Brunton-Smith, I. (2008). Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: A meta-analysis. Public Understanding of Science, 17(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506070159
- Aristeidou, M., & Herodotou, C. (2020). Online citizen science: A systematic review of effects on learning and scientific literacy. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1), 69. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.224
- Baram-Tsabari, A., Sethi, R. J., Bry, L., & Yarden, A. (2006). Using questions sent to an ask-a-scientist site to identify children’s interests in science. Science Education, 90(6), 1050–1072. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20163
- Baram-Tsabari, A., Sethi, R. J., Bry, L., & Yarden, A. (2009). Asking scientists: A decade of questions analyzed by age, gender, and country. Science Education, 93(1), 131–160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20284
- Bela, G., Peltola, T., Young, J. C., Balázs, B., Arpin, I., Pataki, G., Hauck, J., Kelemen, E., Kopperoinen, L., van Herzele, A., Keune, H., Hecker, S., Suškevičs, M., Roy, H. E., Itkonen, P., Külvik, M., László, M., Basnou, C., Pino, J., & Bonn, A. (2016). Learning and the transformative potential of citizen science. Conservation Biology, 30(5), 990–999. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12762
- Besley, J. C. (2014). Science and technology: Public attitudes and understanding. In National Science Board (Ed.), Science and engineering indicators 2014 (7-1-7-53). National Science Foundation (NSB 14-01).
- Besley, J. C., Dudo, A., & Storksdieck, M. (2015). Scientists’ views about communication training. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(2), 199–220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21186
- Blanco-López, Á, España-Ramos, E., González-García, F. J., & Franco-Mariscal, A. J. (2015). Key aspects of scientific competence for citizenship: A delphi study of the expert community in Spain. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(2), 164–198. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21188
- Bonney, R. E., Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T. B., Rosenberg, K. V., & Shirk, J. (2009). Citizen science: A developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience, 59(11), 977–984. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9
- Bonney, R. E., Phillips, T. B., Ballard, H. L., & Enck, J. W. (2016). Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public Understanding of Science, 25(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515607406
- Bromme, R., & Goldman, S. R. (2014). The public’s bounded understanding of science. Educational Psychologist, 49(2), 59–69. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.921572
- Bromme, R., & Kienhues, D. (2017). Gewissheit und Skepsis: Wissenschaftskommunikation als Forschungsthema der Psychologie. Psychologische Rundschau, 68(3), 167–171. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000359
- Bromme, R., Rambow, R., & Nückles, M. (2001). Expertise and estimating what other people know: The influence of professional experience and type of knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7(4), 317–330. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.7.4.317
- Brossard, D., Lewenstein, B. V., & Bonney, R. E. (2005). Scientific knowledge and attitude change: The impact of a citizen science project. International Journal of Science Education, 27(9), 1099–1121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500069483
- Bruckermann, T., Greving, H., Schumann, A., Stillfried, M., Börner, K., Kimmig, S. E., Hagen, R., Brandt, M., & Harms, U. (2021). To know about science is to love it? Unraveling cause–effect relationships between knowledge and attitudes toward science in citizen science on urban wildlife ecology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(8), 1179–1202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21697
- Carr, A. E., Grand, A., & Sullivan, M. (2017). Knowing me, knowing you. Science Communication, 39(6), 771–781. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547017736891
- Clayton, M. J. (1997). Delphi: A technique to harness expert opinion for critical decision-making tasks in education. Educational Psychology, 17(4), 373–386. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341970170401
- de Groot, J. I. M., Steg, L., & Poortinga, W. (2013). Values, perceived risks and benefits, and acceptability of nuclear energy. Risk Analysis, 33(2), 307–317. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01845.x
- Diamond, I. R., Grant, R. C., Feldman, B. M., Pencharz, P. B., Ling, S. C., Moore, A. M., & Wales, P. W. (2014). Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of delphi studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(4), 401–409. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.002
- Falk, J. H., Storksdieck, M., & Dierking, L. D. (2007). Investigating public science interest and understanding: Evidence for the importance of free-choice learning. Public Understanding of Science, 16(4), 455–469. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506064240
- Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research (4. Ed., rev., expanded and updated.). Sage.
- Follett, R., & Strezov, V. (2015). An analysis of citizen science based research: Usage and publication patterns. PloS One, 10(11), e0143687. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143687
- Groulx, M., Brisbois, M. C., Lemieux, C. J., Winegardner, A., & Fishback, L. (2017). A role for nature-based citizen science in promoting individual and collective climate change action? A systematic review of learning outcomes. Science Communication, 39(1), 45–76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547016688324
- Haywood, B. K. (2016). Beyond data points and research contributions: The personal meaning and value associated with public participation in scientific research. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 6(3), 239–262. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2015.1043659
- Haywood, B. K., & Besley, J. C. (2014). Education, outreach, and inclusive engagement: Towards integrated indicators of successful program outcomes in participatory science. Public Understanding of Science, 23(1), 92–106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513494560
- Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). Trust in science and the science of trust. In B. Blöbaum (Ed.), Trust and communication in a digitized world: Models and concepts of trust research (pp. 143–159). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28059-2_8
- Jordan, R. C., Ballard, H. L., & Phillips, T. B. (2012). Key issues and new approaches for evaluating citizen-science learning outcomes. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), 307–309. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1890/110280
- Jordan, R. C., Gray, S. A., Howe, D. V., Brooks, W. R., & Ehrenfeld, J. G. (2011). Knowledge gain and behavioral change in citizen-science programs. Conservation Biology, 25(6), 1148–1154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01745.x
- Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis. Human Communication Research, 30(3), 411–433. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00738.x
- Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
- Lewenstein, B. V., & Bonney, R. E. (2004). Different ways of looking at public understanding of research. In D. Chittenden, G. Farmelo, & B. V. Lewenstein (Eds.), Creating connections: Museums and the public understanding of current research (pp. 63–71). Altamira Press.
- Lu, H., McComas, K. A., Buttke, D. E., Roh, S., & Wild, M. A. (2016). A one health message about bats increases intentions to follow public health guidance on bat rabies. PloS One, 11(5), e0156205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156205
- Mayoh, K., & Knutton, S. (1997). Using out-of-school experience in science lessons: Reality or rhetoric? International Journal of Science Education, 19(7), 849–867. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069970190708
- Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2). http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/download/1089/2384
- McDonald, R. I., Mansur, A. V., Ascensão, F., Colbert, M., Crossman, K., Elmqvist, T., Gonzalez, A., Güneralp, B., Haase, D., Hamann, M., Hillel, O., Huang, K., Kahnt, B., Maddox, D., Pacheco, A., Pereira, H. M., Seto, K. C., Simkin, R., Walsh, B., … Ziter, C. (2020). Research gaps in knowledge of the impact of urban growth on biodiversity. Nature Sustainability, 3(1), 16–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0436-6
- Mukherjee, N., Hugé, J., Sutherland, W. J., McNeill, J., van Opstal, M., Dahdouh-Guebas, F., Koedam, N., & Anderson, B. (2015). The delphi technique in ecology and biological conservation: Applications and guidelines. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 6(9), 1097–1109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12387
- Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What “Ideas-about-science" should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692–720. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10105
- Peter, M., Diekötter, T., & Kremer, K. (2019). Participant outcomes of biodiversity citizen science projects: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 11(10), 2780. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102780
- Peterman, K., & Young, D. (2015). Mystery shopping: An innovative method for observing interactions with scientists during public science events. Visitor Studies, 18(1), 83–102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2015.1016369
- Phillips, T. B., Porticella, N., Constas, M., & Bonney, R. E. (2018). A framework for articulating and measuring individual learning outcomesfrom participation in citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 3(2), 3. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.126
- Ryder, J. (2001). Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy. Studies in Science Education, 36(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260108560166
- Schuttler, S. G., Sorensen, A. E., Jordan, R. C., Cooper, C., & Shwartz, A. (2018). Bridging the nature gap: Can citizen science reverse the extinction of experience? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 16(7), 405–411. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1826
- Seakins, A. (2015). Revealing questions: What are learners asking about? In D. Corrigan, C. Buntting, J. Dillon, A. Jones, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The future in learning science: What’s in it for the learner? (1st ed., pp. 245–262). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16543-1_13
- Seakins, A., & Dillon, J. (2013). Exploring research themes in public engagement within a natural history museum: A modified delphi approach. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 3(1), 52–76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2012.753168
- Sickler, J., Cherry, T. M., Allee, L., Smyth, R. R., & Losey, J. (2014). Scientific value and educational goals: Balancing priorities and increasing adult engagement in a citizen science project. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 13(2), 109–119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2014.947051
- Stillfried, M., Gras, P., Börner, K., Göritz, F., Painer, J., Röllig, K., Wenzler, M., Hofer, H., Ortmann, S., & Kramer-Schadt, S. (2017). Secrets of success in a landscape of fear: Urban wild boar adjust risk perception and tolerate disturbance. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 683. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2017.00157
- Stocklmayer, S. M., & Bryant, C. (2012). Science and the public—what should people know? International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 2(1), 81–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.543186
- Stocklmayer, S. M., Rennie, L. J., & Gilbert, J. K. (2010). The roles of the formal and informal sectors in the provision of effective science education. Studies in Science Education, 46(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260903562284
- Stuckey, M., Hofstein, A., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Eilks, I. (2013). The meaning of ‘relevance’ in science education and its implications for the science curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.802463
- Trench, B. (2008). Towards an analytical framework of science communication models. In D. Cheng, M. Claessens, T. Gascoigne, J. Metcalfe, B. Schiele, & S. Shi (Eds.), Communicating science in social contexts: New models, new practices (pp. 119–135). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8598-7_7
- Wals, A. E. J., Brody, M., Dillon, J., & Stevenson, R. B. (2014). Convergence between science and environmental education. Science, 344(6184), 583–584. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1250515