References
- Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
- American Academy of Arts & Science. (2018). Perceptions of Science in America. https://www.amacad.org/sites/default/files/publication/downloads/PFoS-Perceptions-Science-America.pdf
- Bankston, A., & McDowell, G. S. (2018). Changing the culture of science communication training for junior scientists. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 19(1), 19.11.10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.1413
- Baram-Tsabari, A., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2017a). Science communication training: What are we trying to teach? International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 7(3), 285–300. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2017.1303756
- Baram-Tsabari, A., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2017b). Preparing scientists to be science communicators. In P. G. Patrick (Ed.), Preparing informal science educators: Perspectives from science communication and education (pp. 437–471). Springer International Publishing.
- Baron, N. (2010). Escape from the ivory tower: A guide to making your science matter. Island Press.
- Bentley, P., & Kyvik, S. (2011). Academic staff and public communication: A survey of popular science publishing across 13 countries. Public Understanding of Science, 20(1), 48–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510384461
- Besley, J. C. (2015). What do scientists think about the public and does it matter to their online engagement? Science and Public Policy, 42(2), 201–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scu042
- Besley, J. C., Dudo, A., & Storksdieck, M. (2015). Scientists’ views about communication training. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(2), 199–220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21186
- Besley, J. C., Dudo, A., & Yuan, S. (2018a). Scientists’ views about communication objectives. Public Understanding of Science, 27(6), 708–730. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662517728478
- Besley, J. C., Dudo, A., Yuan, S., & Lawrence, F. (2018b). Understanding scientists’ willingness to engage. Science Communication, 40(5), 559–590. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547018786561
- Besley, J. C., Dudo, A. D., Yuan, S., & Abi Ghannam, N. (2016). Qualitative interviews with science communication trainers about communication objectives and goals. Science Communication, 38(3), 356–381. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547016645640
- Besley, J. C., & Tanner, A. H. (2011). What science communication scholars think about training scientists to communicate. Science Communication, 33(2), 239–263. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547010386972
- Bray, B., France, B., & Gilbert, J. K. (2012). Identifying the essential elements of effective science communication: What do the experts say? International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 2(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2011.611627
- Brossard, D. (2013). New media landscapes and the science information consumer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(Supplement 3), 14096–14101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212744110
- Burns, T. W., O'Connor, D. J., & Stocklmayer, S. M. (2003). Science communication: A contemporary definition. Public Understanding of Science, 12(2), 183–202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625030122004
- Carifio, J., & Perla, R. (2008). Resolving the 50-year debate around using and misusing Likert scales. Medical Education, 42(12), 1150–1152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03172.x
- Cerrato, S., Daelli, V., Pertot, H., & Puccioni, O. (2018). The public-engaged scientists: Motivations, enablers and barriers. Research for All, 2(2), 313–322. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18546/RFA.02.2.09
- Chandra, S., Mohammadnezhad, M., & Ward, P. (2018). Trust and communication in a doctor- patient relationship: A literature review. Journal of Healthcare Communications, 03(36), 1–6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4172/2472-1654.100146
- Colson, V. (2011). Science blogs as competing channels for the dissemination of science news. Journalism, 12(7), 889–902. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911412834
- Cooke, S. J., Gallagher, A. J., Sopinka, N. M., Nguyen, V. M., Skubel, R. A., Hammerschlag, N., Boon, S., Young, N., & Danylchuk, A. J. (2017). Considerations for effective science communication. FACETS, 2(1), 233–248. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2016-0055
- Crowe, S., Cresswell, K., Robertson, A., Huby, G., Avery, A., & Sheikh, A. (2011). The case study approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11(1), 100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-100
- Dietz, T. (2013). Bringing values and deliberation to science communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(Supplement 3), 14081–14087. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212740110
- Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed). John Wiley & Sons.
- Dudo, A., & Besley, J. C. (2016). Scientists’ prioritization of communication objectives for public engagement. PLoS ONE, 11(2), e0148867. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148867
- Ecklund, E. H., James, S. A., & Lincoln, A. E. (2012). How academic biologists and physicists view science outreach. PLoS ONE, 7(5), e36240. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036240
- Fischhoff, B. (2013). The sciences of science communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(Suppl. 3), 14033–14039. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1213273110
- Fischhoff, B. (2019). Evaluating science communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(16), 7670. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1805863115
- Hamlyn, B., Shanahan, M., Lewis, H., O'Donoghue, E., Hanson, T., & Burchell, K. (2015). Factors affecting public engagement by researchers: A study on behalf of a consortium of uk public research funders. https://cms.wellcome.org/sites/default/files/wtp060032.pdf
- Humm, C., & Schrögel, P. (2020). Science for all? Practical recommendations on reaching underserved audiences. Frontiers in Communication, 5(42), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00042
- Hunter, P. (2016). The communications gap between scientists and public. EMBO Reports, 17(11), 1513–1515. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201643379
- Jacobson, N., Butterill, D., & Goering, P. (2004). Organizational factors that influence university-based researchers’ engagement in knowledge transfer activities. Science Communication, 25(3), 246–259. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547003262038
- Lewenstein, B. (2019). The need for feminist approaches to science communication. Journal of Science Communication, 18(4), C01. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22323/2.18040301
- Loroño-Leturiondo, M., & Davies, S. R. (2018). Responsibility and science communication: Scientists’ experiences of and perspectives on public communication activities. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 5(2), 170–185. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2018.1434739
- Martín-Sempere, M. J., Garzón-García, B., & Rey-Rocha, J. (2008). Scientists' motivation to communicate science and technology to the public: Surveying participants at the Madrid science fair. Public Understanding of Science, 17(3), 349–367. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506067660
- Mercer-Mapstone, L., & Kuchel, L. (2017). Core skills for effective science communication: A teaching resource for undergraduate science education. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 7(2), 181–201. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2015.1113573
- Murdock, R. C. (2017). An instrument for assessing the public communication of scientists [Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University]. http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/15586
- NASEM. (2017). Communicating science effectively: A research agenda. The National Academies Press.
- National Research Council. (2008). Public participation in environmental assessment and decision making. National Academies Press.
- Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5), 625–632. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
- Palmer, S. E., & Schibeci, R. A. (2014). What conceptions of science communication are espoused by science research funding bodies? Public Understanding of Science, 23(5), 511–527. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662512455295
- Peters, H. P. (2013). Gap between science and media revisited: Scientists as public communicators. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(Suppl 3), 14102–14109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212745110
- Peters, H. P., Brossard, D., de Cheveigné, S., Dunwoody, S., Kallfass, M., Miller, S., & Tsuchida, S. (2008). Interactions with the mass media. Science, 321(5886), 204–205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1157780
- Peters, H. P., Dunwoody, S., Allgaier, J., Lo, Y. Y., & Brossard, D. (2014). Public communication of science 2.0. EMBO Reports, 15(7), 749–753. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201438979
- Pew Research Center. (2015). How scientists enage the public. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2015/02/15/how-scientists-engage-public/
- Poliakoff, E., & Webb, T. L. (2007). What factors predict scientists’ intentions to participate in public engagement of science activities? Science Communication, 29(2), 242–263. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547007308009
- Rose, K. M., Markowitz, E. M., & Brossard, D. (2020). Scientists’ incentives and attitudes toward public communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(3), 1274–1276. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916740117
- Searle, S. D. (2011). Scientists’ communication with the general public-An Australian survey [Doctoral dissertation, The Australian National University]. https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/8973/4/02whole_Searle.pdf
- Shan, L. C., Panagiotopoulos, P., Regan, Á, De Brún, A., Barnett, J., Wall, P., & McConnon, Á. (2015). Interactive communication with the public: Qualitative exploration of the use of social media by food and health organizations. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 47(1), 104–108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2014.09.004
- Stylinski, C., Storksdieck, M., Canzoneri, N., Klein, E., & Johnson, A. (2018). Impacts of a comprehensive public engagement training and support program on scientists’ outreach attitudes and practices. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 8(4), 340–354. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2018.1506188
- Suleski, J., & Ibaraki, M. (2010). Scientists are talking, but mostly to each other: A quantitative analysis of research represented in mass media. Public Understanding of Science, 19(1), 115–125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508096776
- Texas A&M University. (2022). Division of research. https://vpr.tamu.edu/about-the-division/fact-sheets/
- Texas A&M University Catalogs. (2021). Degrees and programs offered. https://catalog.tamu.edu/graduate/degrees-programs/
- Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., Larivière, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLoS ONE, 8(5), e64841. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064841
- Van Eperen, L., & Marincola, F. M. (2011). How scientists use social media to communicate their research. Journal of Translational Medicine, 9(1), 199. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-9-199
- Yuan, S., Besley, J. C., & Dudo, A. (2019). A comparison between scientists’ and communication scholars’ views about scientists’ public engagement activities. Public Understanding of Science, 28(1), 101–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662518797002