241
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Does endorsement rhetoric matter in citizen science?

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • AbiGhannam, N., & Dudo, A. (2021). Examining the perceived value of a prestigious science engagement award: Views of applicants, finalists, and awardees. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 11(3), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2021.1969605
  • Abimbola, T., Lim, M., Halonen-Knight, E., & Hurmerinta, L. (2010). Who endorses whom? Meanings transfer in celebrity endorsement. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 19(6), 452–460. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610421011085767
  • Almeida Costa, A., & Zemsky, P. (2021). The choice of value-based strategies under rivalry: Whether to enhance value creation or bargaining capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 42(11), 2020–2046. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3282
  • Aristotle, & Roberts, W. R. (1954). Aristotle: Rhetoric. Modern Library. (Original work circa 347 B.C.).
  • Barry, A. (2020). Afterword: ‘I will play my part!’, or parliamentary politics in action. Social Studies of Science, 50(2), 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312720911151
  • Benyei, P., Pardo-de-Santayana, M., Aceituno-Mata, L., Calvet-Mir, L., Carrascosa-García, M., Rivera-Ferre, M., Perdomo-Molina, A., & Reyes-García, V. (2021). Participation in citizen science: Insights from the CONECT-e case study. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 46(4), 755–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243920948110
  • Biggs, J., Ewald, N., Valentini, A., Gaboriaud, C., Dejean, T., Griffiths, R. A., Foster, J., Wilkinson, J. W., Arnell, A., Brotherton, P., Williams, P., & Dunn, F. (2015). Using eDNA to develop a national citizen science-based monitoring programme for the great crested newt (Triturus cristatus). Biological Conservation, 183, 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.029
  • Bradley, E. D. (2020). The influence of linguistic and social attitudes on grammaticality judgments of singular ‘they’. Language Sciences, 78, 101272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101272
  • Braet, A. C. (1992). Ethos, pathos and logos in Aristotle's rhetoric: A re-examination. Argumentation, 6(3), 307–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00154696
  • Brouwer, S., & Hessels, L. K. (2019). Increasing research impact with citizen science: The influence of recruitment strategies on sample diversity. Public Understanding of Science, 28(5), 606–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519840934
  • Bruckermann, T., Stillfried, M., Straka, T. M., & Harms, U. (2022). Citizen science projects require agreement: A Delphi study to identify which knowledge on urban ecology is considered relevant from scientists’ and citizens’ perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 12(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2022.2028925
  • Bürger, T., & Kleinert, S. (2021). Crowdfunding cultural and commercial entrepreneurs: An empirical study on motivation in distinct backer communities. Small Business Economics, 57(2), 667–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00419-8
  • Cappa, F., Laut, J., Porfiri, M., & Giustiniano, L. (2018). Bring them aboard: Rewarding participation in technology-mediated citizen science projects. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 246–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.017
  • Carusi, C., & Bianchi, G. (2020). A look at interdisciplinarity using bipartite scholar/journal networks. Scientometrics, 122(2), 867–894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03309-3
  • Castelain, T., Bernard, S., Van der Henst, J. B., & Mercier, H. (2016). The influence of power and reason on young Maya children's endorsement of testimony. Developmental Science, 19(6), 957–966. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12336
  • Chondrakis, G., Serrano, C. J., & Ziedonis, R. H. (2021). Information disclosure and the market for acquiring technology companies. Strategic Management Journal, 42(5), 1024–1053. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3260
  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
  • da Costa Cabral, I. (2021). From discourses about language-ineducation policy to language practices in the classroom—A linguistic ethnographic study of a multi-scalar nature in Timor-Leste. Language Policy, 20(1), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-020-09563-z
  • Daniels, B. M., & Phillips, K. R. (2020). Between critical and rhetoric: McKerrow’s contribution to contemporary critical practice. International Journal of Communication, 14, 912–925. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/8639
  • Dimitriadis, S. (2021). Social capital and entrepreneur resilience: Entrepreneur performance during violent protests in Togo. Strategic Management Journal, 42(11), 1993–2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3292
  • Dow, S. (1939). Aristotle, the kleroteria, and the courts. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 50, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.2307/310590
  • Drakos, K. (2010). Terrorism activity, investor sentiment, and stock returns. Review of Financial Economics, 19(3), 128–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rfe.2010.01.001
  • Ducasse, A. M. (2020). Evidence-based persuasion: A crosscultural analysis of entrepreneurial pitch in English and Spanish. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 18, 492–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-020-00278-0
  • Franzoni, C., & Sauermann, H. (2014). Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy, 43(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.005
  • Gilal, F. G., Paul, J., Gilal, N. G., & Gilal, R. G. (2020). Celebrity endorsement and brand passion among air travelers: Theory and evidence. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 85, 102347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.102347
  • Han, J.-T., Chen, Q., Liu, J.-G., Luo, X.-L., & Fan, W. (2018). The persuasion of borrowers’ voluntary information in peer to peer lending: An empirical study based on elaboration likelihood model. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 200–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.004
  • Hong, W., Yu, Z., Wu, L., & Pu, X. (2020). Influencing factors of the persuasiveness of online reviews considering persuasion methods. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 39, Article 100912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100912
  • Hoque, Z., Mai, K., & Ozdil, E. (2022). Accounting as rhetorical devices during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from Australian universities. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 34(6), 168–192. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-09-2021-0137
  • Ihlen, Ø. (2020). Science communication, strategic communication and rhetoric: The case of health authorities, vaccine hesitancy, trust and credibility. Journal of Communication Management, 24(3), 163–167. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-03-2020-0017
  • Isai, K. I. A., Lin, T. M., Ching, H. S., Selvajothi, R., & Maruthai, E. (2020). Using rhetorical approach of ethos, pathos and logos by Malaysian engineering students in persuasive email writings. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 5(4), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v5i4.386
  • Janssen, L., Schouten, A. P., & Croes, E. A. J. (2022). Influencer advertising on Instagram: Product-influencer fit and number of followers affect advertising outcomes and influencer evaluations via credibility and identification. International Journal of Advertising, 41(1), 101–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2021.1994205
  • Jiang, C., Han, R., Xu, Q., & Liu, Y. (2020). The impact of soft information extracted from descriptive text on crowdfunding performance. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 43, Article 101002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2020.101002
  • Kasakowskij, T., Fürst, J., Fischer, J., & Fietkiewicz, K. J. (2020). Network enforcement as denunciation endorsement? A critical study on legal enforcement in social media. Telematics and Informatics, 46, 101317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101317
  • Kasavin, I. T. (2020). Science and public good: Max Weber’s ethical implications. Social Epistemology, 34(2), 184–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2019.1695010
  • Kennedy, G. A. (2007). Aristotle on rhetoric: A theory of civic discourse: Translated with introduction, notes and appendices. Oxford University Press.
  • Laird, F. N. (2020). Sticky policies, dysfunctional systems: Path dependency and the problems of government funding for science in the United States. Minerva, 58(4), 513–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-020-09409-2
  • Laslo, E., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2021). Expressions of science literacy in online public discussions of animal experimentation. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 11(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2020.1871103
  • Lee, C. H., Bian, Y., Karaouzene, R., & Suleiman, N. (2019). Examining the role of narratives in civic crowdfunding: Linguistic style and message substance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 119(7), 1492–1514. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-08-2018-0370
  • Maienschein, J., Parker, J. N., Laubichler, M., & Hackett, E. J. (2019). Data management and data sharing in science and technology studies. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 44(1), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243918798906
  • Majumdar, A., & Bose, I. (2018). My words for your pizza: An analysis of persuasive narratives in online crowdfunding. Information & Management, 55(6), 781–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.03.007
  • Mangiò, F., Pedeliento, G., & Andreini, D. (2021). Branding rhetoric in times of a global pandemic: A text-mining analysis. Journal of Advertising, 50(3), 240–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2021.1927912
  • Mara, G. M. (2000). The logos of the wise in the politeia of the many: Recent books on Aristotle's political philosophy. Political Theory, 28(6), 835–860. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591700028006007
  • Marris, C., & Calvert, J. (2020). Science and technology studies in policy: The UK synthetic biology roadmap. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 45(1), 34–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919828107
  • Mayne, F., Howitt, C., & Rennie, L. J. (2017). Using interactive nonfiction narrative to enhance competence in the informed consent process with 3-year-old children. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(3), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2016.1260833
  • McNew-Birren, J., & Gaul-Stout, J. (2022). Understanding scientific literacy through personal and civic engagement: A citizen science case study. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 12(2), 126–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2022.2047241
  • Mehraliyev, F., Kirilenko, A. P., & Choi, Y. (2020). From measurement scale to sentiment scale: Examining the effect of sensory experiences on online review rating behavior. Tourism Management, 79, Article 104096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104096
  • Merton, R. K. (1957). Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 635–659. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089193
  • Monge-Benito, S., Elorriaga-Illera, A., & Olabarri-Fernández, E. (2020). YouTube celebrity endorsement: Audience evaluation of source attributes and response to sponsored content. Communication & Society, 33(3), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.33.3.149-166
  • Navas Iannini, A. M., & Pedretti, E. (2022). Museum staff perspectives about a sustainability exhibition: What do they tell us about scientific literacy? International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 12(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2021.2015638
  • Oehmichen, J., Firk, S., Wolff, M., & Maybuechen, F. (2021). Standing out from the crowd: Dedicated institutional investors and strategy uniqueness. Strategic Management Journal, 42(6), 1083–1108. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3269
  • Oeppen Hill, J. H. (2020). Logos, ethos, pathos and the marketing of higher education. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 30(1), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2019.1683120
  • Park, S., & Nicolau, J. L. (2015). Asymmetric effects of online consumer reviews. Annals of Tourism Research, 50, 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2014.10.007
  • Rögele, A., Scheiter, K., & Randler, C. (2022). Can involvement induced by guidance foster scientific reasoning and knowledge of participants of a citizen science project? International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 12(2), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2022.2043567
  • Salmivaara, V., & Kibler, E. (2020). ‘Rhetoric mix’ of argumentations: How policy rhetoric conveys meaning of entrepreneurship for sustainable development. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(4), 700–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719845345
  • Sandra, B., & Joshua, S. G. (2022). Storm crowds: Evidence from Zooniverse on crowd contribution design. Research Policy, 51(1), Article 104414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104414
  • Schimmelpfennig, C., & Hunt, J. B. (2020). Fifty years of celebrity endorser research: Support for a comprehensive celebrity endorsement strategy framework. Psychology & Marketing, 37(3), 488–505. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21315
  • Schouten, A. P., Janssen, L., & Verspaget, M. (2020). Celebrity vs. influencer endorsements in advertising: The role of identification, credibility, and product-endorser fit. International Journal of Advertising, 39(2), 258–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2019.1634898
  • Sebastian, D., Terence, K., & Martin, R. (2022). Crowding in and crowding out within a contribution good model of research. Research Policy, 51(1), Article 104400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104400
  • Silva Luna, D., Bering, J. M., & Halberstadt, J. B. (2022). The value and distinctiveness of awe in science communication: Comparing the incidence and content of ‘awesome’ representations in science and non-science picture books. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 12(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2022.2048119
  • Silvertown, J. (2009). A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(9), 467–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.017
  • Smallman, M. (2020). ‘Nothing to do with the science’: How an elite sociotechnical imaginary cements policy resistance to public perspectives on science and technology through the machinery of government. Social Studies of Science, 50(4), 589–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127198797
  • Spry, A., Pappu, R., & Cornwell, T. B. (2011). Celebrity endorsement, brand credibility and brand equity. European Journal of Marketing, 45(6), 882–909.
  • Stocklmayer, S. M., Rennie, L. J., & Gilbert, J. K. (2010). The roles of the formal and informal sectors in the provision of effective science education. Studies in Science Education, 46(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260903562284
  • Stucki, I., & Sager, F. (2018). Aristotelian framing: Lgos, Ehos, Pthos and the use of evidence in policy frames. Policy Sciences, 51(3), 373–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9322-8
  • Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 35–67. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.35
  • Tseng, E. K., Mukerji, G., Weinerman, A., Fuller, J., McLeod, A., Wong, B. M., Kuper, A., & Stroud, L. S. (2020). Choosing words wisely: Residents’ use of rhetorical appeals in conversations about unnecessary tests. Academic Medicine, 95(2), 275–282. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002980
  • Turner, S. (2009). Many approaches, but few arrivals: Merton and the Columbia model of theory construction. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 39(2), 174–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393108326484
  • Wahab, O. A., Cohen, R., Bentahar, J., Otrok, H., Mourad, A., & Rjoub, G. (2020). An endorsement-based trust bootstrapping approach for newcomer cloud services. Information Sciences, 527, 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.03.102
  • Wang, Q., Wang, L., Zhang, X., Mao, Y., & Wang, P. (2017). The impact research of online reviews’ sentiment polarity presentation on consumer purchase decision. Information Technology & People, 30(3), 522–541. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-06-2014-0116
  • Wang, W., Chen, W., Zhu, K., & Wang, H. (2020). Emphasizing the entrepreneur or the idea? The impact of text content emphasis on investment decisions in crowdfunding. Decision Support Systems, 136, 113341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2020.113341
  • Wang, W., Guo, L., & Wu, Y. J. (2022). The merits of a sentiment analysis of antecedent comments for the prediction of online fundraising outcomes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, Article 121070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121070
  • Wang, W., Guo, L., Wu, Y. J., Goh, M., & Wang, S. (2022). Content-oriented or persona-oriented? A text analytics of endorsement strategies on public willingness to participate in citizen science. Information Processing & Management, 59(2), Article 102832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102832
  • Wenzel, M., Stanske, S., & Lieberman, M. B. (2020). Strategic responses to crisis. Strategic Management Journal, 41, 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3161
  • Wilson, S. (2021). To mix or not to mix: Parental attitudes towards translanguaging and language management choices. International Journal of Bilingualism, 25(1), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006920909902
  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2016). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Nelson Education.
  • Wu, J., Peng, C., Wang, H., & Da, F. (2022). An analysis of persuasive narratives in medical crowdfunding. Procedia Computer Science, 199, 399–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.049
  • Wu, Y., Zhang, X., & Xiao, Q. (2022). Appeal to the head and heart: The persuasive effects of medical crowdfunding charitable appeals on willingness to donate. Information Processing & Management, 59(1), Article 102792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102792
  • Yu, Y., Si, X., Hu, C., & Zhang, J. (2019). A review of recurrent neural networks: LSTM cells and network architectures. Neural Computation, 31(7), 1235–1270. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco_a_01199
  • Zhang, H., & Chen, W. (2019). Backer motivation in crowdfunding new product ideas: Is it about you or is it about me? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(2), 241–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12477
  • Zhang, H., Xu, H., & Gursoy, D. (2020). The effect of celebrity endorsement on destination brand love: A comparison of previous visitors and potential tourists. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 17, Article 100454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2020.100454
  • Zhong, Z.-J., & Lin, S. (2018). The antecedents and consequences of charitable donation heterogeneity on social media. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 23(1), e1585. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1585
  • Zhu, Y.-Q., Amelina, D., & Yen, D. C. (2020). Celebrity endorsement and impulsive buying intentions in social commerce – the case of Instagram in Indonesia: Celebrity endorsement. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations (JECO), 18(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4018/JECO.2020010101

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.