Wild boars in the streets: applying a socio-scientific issue framework to analyze news items

References

• Albe, V. (2008). Students’ positions and considerations of scientific evidence about a controversial socioscientific issue. Science & Education, 17(8), 805–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9086-6
   Google Scholar
• Avraamidou, L., & Osborne, J. (2009). The role of narrative in communicating science. International Journal of Science Education, 31(12), 1683–1707. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802380695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baram-Tsabari, A., & Osborne, J. (2015). Bridging science education and science communication research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(2), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barel-Ben David, Y., Garty, E. S., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2020). Can scientists fill the science journalism void? Online public engagement with science stories authored by scientists. PLoS One, 15(1), e0222250. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beniermann, A., Mecklenburg, L., & Upmeier zu Belzen, A. (2021). Reasoning on controversial science issues in science education and science communication. Education Sciences, 11(9), 522. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, P. R., & Ley, B. L. (2011). Multiple exposures: Scientific controversy, the media, and public responses to Bisphenol A. Science Communication, 33(1), 76–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547010377879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, P. R., Wise, D., & Ley, B. L. (2014). Chemical controversy: Canadian and US news coverage of the scientific debate about bisphenol A. Environmental Communication, 8(1), 21–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broitman, D., Griskin, V., & Czamanski, D. (2019). Unbundling negative and positive externalities of nature in cities: The influence of wild animals on housing prices. Urban Studies, 56(13), 2820–2836. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018800576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck, S. J. (2009). A ‘wicked’ problem: Institutional structures and wildlife management success. In M. J. Manfredo, J. J. Vaske, P. J. Brown, D. J. Decker, & E. A. Duke (Eds.), Wildlife and society (pp. 172–183). Washington: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Casper, A. M. A., & Balgopal, M. M. (2020). How guest experts tell stories about environmental socio-scientific issues in an undergraduate class. International Journal of Science Education, 42(9), 1568–1584. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1772519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colson, V. (2011). Science blogs as competing channels for the dissemination of science news. Journalism, 12(7), 889–902. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911412834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Combs, M. A., Kache, P. A., VanAcker, M. C., Gregory, N., Plimpton, L. D., Tufts, D. M., Fernandez, M. P., & Diuk-Wasser, M. A. (2022). Socio-ecological drivers of multiple zoonotic hazards in highly urbanized cities. Global Change Biology, 28(5), 1705–1724. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalyot, K., Sharon, A. J., Orr, D., Barel Ben-David, Y., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2021). Public engagement with science in everyday life: Perceptions of Wi-Fi radiation risks in schools. Research in Science Education, 51(2), 1035–1054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09894-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, A., Malkinson, D., Schonblum, A., Koren, L., & Shanas, U. (2021). Do boars compensate for hunting with higher reproductive hormones? 9. https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coab068
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, A., Malkinson, D., & Shanas, U. (2022). Wild boar foraging and risk perception—variation among urban, natural, and agricultural areas. Journal of Mammalogy, 103(4), 945–955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deuze, M. (2005). What is journalism? Professional Identity and Ideology of Journalism Reconsidered. Journalism, 6, 442–464.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, J., Stevenson, R. B., & Wals, A. E. (2016). Introduction to the special section moving from citizen to civic science to address wicked conservation problems. Corrected by erratum 12844. Conservation Biology, 30(3), 450–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dori, Y. J., Tal, R. T., & Tsaushu, M. (2003). Teaching biotechnology topics through case studies - can we improve higher order thinking skills of nonscience majors?. Science Education, 87, 767–793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• dos Santos, W. L. P. (2014). Debate on global warming as a socio-scientific issue: Science teaching towards political literacy. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 9(3), 663–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9596-x
   Google Scholar
• Drews, S., & van den Bergh, J. C. (2016). What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies. Climate Policy, 16(7), 855–876. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1058240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elton, C. (2020). The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fahy, D. (2008). Skeptical science, Columbia Journalism Review. https://archives.cjr.org/the_observatory/skeptical_of_science.php.
   Google Scholar
• Feinstein, N. W. (2015). Education, communication, and science in the public sphere. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(2), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinstein, N. W., Allen, S., & Jenkins, E. (2013). Outside the pipeline: Reimagining science education for nonscientists. Science, 340(6130), 314–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink, K., & Schudson, M. (2014). The rise of contextual journalism, 1950s–2000s. Journalism, 15(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884913479015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, L., Mun, K., & Kim, S.-W. (2021). Using socioscientific issues to enhance students’ emotional competence. Research in Science Education, 51, 935–956. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09873-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginosar, A., & Reich, Z. (2022). Obsessive-activist journalists: A new model of journalism? Journalism Practice, 16(4), 660–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2020.1816488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginosar, A., & Tal, T. (2018). Teaching journalistic texts in science classes: The importance of media literacy. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27, 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9718-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginosar, A., Zimmerman, I., & Tal, T. (2022). Peripheral science journalism: Scientists and journalists dancing on the same floor. Journalism Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2022.2072368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guenther, L., Bischoff, J., Löwe, A., Marzinkowski, H., & Voigt, M. (2019). Scientific evidence and science journalism: Analysing the representation of (un) certainty in German print and online media. Journalism Studies, 20(1), 40–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heider, D., McCombs, M., & Poindexter, P. M. (2005). What the public expects of local news: Views on public and traditional journalism. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 82(4), 952–967. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900508200412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerit, J., Zhao, Y., Tan, M., & Wheeler, M. (2019). Differences between national and local media in news coverage of the Zika virus. Health Communication, 34(14), 1816–1823. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1536949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kizel, A., & Fuierstein, M. (2011). In the shadow of the center: Local media and news coverage in the periphery. Kesher, 41, 78–87. in Hebrew.
   Google Scholar
• Kolstø, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85(3), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovach, B., & Rosentiel, T. (2014). The element of journalism. Three Rivers.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, A., & Bucy, E. P. (2018). Interpreting images of fracking: How visual frames and standing attitudes shape perceptions of environmental risk and economic benefit. Environmental Communication, 12(3), 322–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1412996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laslo, E., Baram-Tsabari, A., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2011). A growth medium for the message: Online science journalism affordances for exploring public discourse of science and ethics. Journalism, 12(7), 847–870. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911412709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. C., & Grace, M. (2010). Students’ reasoning processes in making decisions about an authentic, local socio-scientific issue: Bat conservation. Journal of Biological Education, 44(4), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2010.9656216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, R. (2006). Towards a theoretical framework for teaching controversial socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 28(10), 1201–1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600560753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewenstein, B. V. (2015). Identifying what matters: Science education, science communication, and democracy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(2), 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magle, S. B., Fidino, M., Lehrer, E. W., Gallo, T., Mulligan, M. P., Ríos, M. J., Ahlers, A. A., Angstmann, J., Belaire, A., Dugelby, B., Gramza, A., Hartley, L., MacDougall, B., Ryan, T., Salsbury, C., Sander, H., Schell, C., Simon, K., St Onge, S., & Drake, D. (2019). Advancing urban wildlife research through a multi-city collaboration. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 17(4), 232–239. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manosevitch, I., & Lev-On, A. (2014). The Israeli local press 2013: Characteristics and trends. Media Frames, 12, 1–28. (In Hebrew).
   Google Scholar
• Mazur, A. (2016). How did the fracking controversy emerge in the period 2010–2012? Public Understanding of Science, 25(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662514545311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazur, A. (2017). Technical controversies over public policy: From fluoridation to fracking and climate change. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McQuail, D. (2013). Journalism and society. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (2000). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. King’s College.
   Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2016). Science literacy: Concepts, contexts, and consequences. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/23595.
   Google Scholar
• Nature. (2017). Science journalism can be evidence-based, compelling — and wrong. Nature, 543(7644), 150. https://doi.org/10.1038/543150a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oulton, C., Day, V., Dillon, J., & Grace, M. (2004). Controversial issues - teachers' attitudes and practices in the context of citizenship education. Oxford Review of Education, 30(4), 489–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498042000303973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, T. E. (1993). Out of order. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, A., Anderson, A., Allan, S., & Wilkinson, C. (2009). Opening the black box: Scientists’ views on the role of the news media in the nanotechnology debate. Public Understanding of Science, 18(5), 512–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662507084202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, M., & Grace, M. (2003). Science education for citizenship: Teaching socio-scientific issues. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. A., & Bybee, R. W. (2014). Scientific literacy, science literacy, and science education. In N. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2, pp. 545–558). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203097267
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. (2011). Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning and research. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., Foulk, J. A., & Friedrichsen, P. J. (2017). Evolution of a model for socio-scientific issue teaching and learning. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, 5(2), 75–87.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2009). Scientific literacy, PISA, and socioscientific discourse: Assessment for progressive aims of science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 909–921. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salagado, S., & Strömbäck, J. (2012). Interpretive journalism: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 144–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911427797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharon, A. J., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2020). Can science literacy help individuals identify misinformation in everyday life? Science Education, 104(5), 873–894. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shasha-Sharf, H., & Tal, T. (2021). Who benefits from the natural gas in Israel? Using a public debate to teach all components of education for sustainable development. In M. Achiam, J. Dillon, & M. Glackin (Eds.), The role of out-of-school science education in addressing wicked problems (pp. 121–147). Switzerland: Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Tal, T., & Kedmi, Y. (2006). Teaching socioscientific issues: Classroom culture and students' performances. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1, 615–644.
   Google Scholar
• Tal, T., Kali, Y., Magid, S., & Madhok, J. J. (2011). Enhancing the authenticity of a Web-based module for teaching simple inheritance. In T. D. Sadler (Ed.), Socio-scientific Issues in the Classroom (pp. 11–38). Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tomas, L., & Ritchie, S. M. (2012). Positive emotional responses to hybridised writing about a socio-scientific issue. Research in Science Education, 42(1), 25–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9255-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphasis: Theory, research, and practice. In Norman G. Lederman & Sandra K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, Volume II (pp. 697–726).
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar