Theory-based science communication at comic cons

References

• Archer, L., & DeWitt, J. (2016). Understanding young people’s science aspirations: How students form ideas about ‘becoming a scientist’. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Avraamidou, L. (2020). Science identity as a landscape of becoming: Rethinking recognition and emotions through an intersectionality lens. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15(2), 323–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09954-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie, M., Foehr, U., Rideout, V., Baer, N., Miller, C., Flournoy, R., & Altman, D. (2001). Communicating health information through the entertainment media. Health Affairs, 20(1), 192–199. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.20.1.192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, K. C. (2016). Polar bears or people? Exploring ways in which teachers frame climate change in the classroom. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 6(2), 137–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2015.1027320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, K. C. (2017). Framing of climate change in United States science education (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.572
   Google Scholar
• Busch, K. C. (2021). Textbooks of doubt, tested: The effect of a denialist framing on adolescents’ certainty about climate change. Environmental Education Research, 27(11), 1574–1598. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2021.1960954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calice, M. N., Bao, L., Beets, B., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., Feinstein, N. W., Heisler, L., Tangen, T., & Handelsman, J. (2023). A triangulated approach for understanding scientists’ perceptions of public engagement with science. Public Understanding of Science, 32(3), 389–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625221122285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canfield, K. N., Menezes, S., Matsuda, S. B., Moore, A., Mosley Austin, A. N., Dewsbury, B. M., Feliú-Mójer, M. I., McDuffie, K. W. B., Moore, K., Reich, C. A., Smith, H. M., & Taylor, C. (2020). Science communication demands a critical approach that centers inclusion, equity, and intersectionality. Frontiers in Communication, 5(A02), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00002
   Google Scholar
• Childers, G., Governor, D., Osmond, D., & Britton, S. (2022). Science cafés: Exploring adults’ motivation to learn science in a community space. Research in Science Education, 52(4), 1055–1073 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09982-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlstrom, M. F. (2010). The role of causality in information acceptance in narratives: An example from Science communication. Communication Research, 37(6), 857–875. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210362683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlstrom, M. F. (2014). Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111 (Suppl 4), 13614–13620. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320645111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, S. R., & Horst, M. (2016). Science communication. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50366-4
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, E. (2014). “Not designed for us”: How science museums and science centers socially exclude low-income, minority ethnic groups. Science Education, 98(6), 981–1008. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWitt, J., & Archer, L. (2017). Participation in informal science learning experiences: The rich get richer? International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 7(4), 356–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2017.1360531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N., & Lupia, A. (2017). Using frames to make scientific communication more effective (K. H. Jamieson, D. M. Kahan, & D. A. Scheufele (Eds.)1, pp. 350–360). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190497620.013.38.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., Pattison, S., Meier, D., Bibas, D., & Livingston, K. (2018). The contribution of science-rich resources to public science interest. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(3), 422–445. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, L., & Schmid-Petri, H. (2023). “There really is a lot of shared understanding, but there are also differences”: Identity configurations in science communicators’ professional identity. Journal of Communication Management, 22(01|1), A07. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.22010207
   Google Scholar
• Fischoff, B. (2013). The sciences of science communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(3), 14033–14039. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1213273110
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gerber, A., Broks, P., Gabriel, M., Lorenz, L., Lorke, J., Merten, W., Metcalfe, J., Muller, B., & Warthun, N. (2020). Science communication research: An empirical field analysis. Edition innovare). Berlin, Germany: Institute for Science and Innovation Communication.
   Google Scholar
• Gittinger, J. L. (2018). Hijabi cosplay: Performances of culture, religion, and fandom. The Journal of Religion and Popular Culture, 30(2), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.3138/jrpc.2016-0005.r1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goward, S. L. (2019). Not so long ago, and not so far away: Where is there room for oppressed people in fandom? Journal of Fandom Studies, 7(1), 67–71. https://doi.org/10.1386/jfs.7.1.67_1
   Google Scholar
• Guenther, L., & Joubert, M. (2017). Science communication as a field of research: identifying trends, challenges and gaps by analysing research papers. Journal of Communication Management, 16(02), A02. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.16020202
   Google Scholar
• Heslop, C., Dudo, A., & Copple, J. (August, 2021). Communicating science across political divides. Center for Media Engagement. https://mediaengagement.org/research/communicating-scienceacross-political-divides.
   Google Scholar
• Hetland, P. (2019). Constructing publics in museums’ science communication. Public Understanding of Science, 28(8), 958–972. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519870692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, S. K., Morales, N. A., Chen, B., Soodeen, R., Moulton, M. P., & Jain, E. (2019). Love or loss: Effective message framing to promote environmental conservation. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 18(3), 252–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2018.1456380
   Google Scholar
• James, V. (2020). Science communication efforts and identity at popular culture conventions. Science Communication, 42(3), 395–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020928571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarreau, P. B., Cancellare, I. A., Carmichael, B. J., Porter, L., Toker, D., & Yammine, S. Z. (2019). Using selfies to challenge public stereotypes of scientists. PLoS One, 14(5), e0216625. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenson, D. E. (2019). Space at the con: Conservations about representation in popular culture at comic conventions. Popular Culture Review, 30(2), 29–56.
   Google Scholar
• Katz-Kimchi, M., & Atkinson, L. (2014). Popular climate science and painless consumer choices. Science Communication, 36(6), 754–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547014555998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kington, C. S. (2015). Con culture: A survey of fans and fandom. Journal of Fandom Studies, 3(2), 211.
   Google Scholar
• Lemmons, V. E. (2019). Cosplaying with gender: Freedoms and limitations to gender exploration at canadian anime conventions [Master thesis]. Carleton University.
   Google Scholar
• Lundgren, L., Stofer, K. A., Dunckel, B. A., Krieger, J., James, V., & Lange, M. (2019). Panel-based exhibit using participatory design elements may motivate behavior change. Journal of Science Communication 18(2), A03 1-18. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.18020203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. I., Nolla, K. M., Eagly, A. H., & Uttal, D. H. (2018). The development of children’s gender-science stereotypes: A meta-analysis of 5 decades of U.S. Draw-A-Scientist Studies. Child Development, 89(6), 1943–1955. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, M., Patterson, S., Edson, E., Williams, S., Torossian, J., & Dwyer, A. (2023). Cosplay as a novel method for outreach in ocean science. Current: The Journal of Marine Education, 38(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.5334/cjme.80
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez, M. A. (2017). “From the Panels to the Margins: Identity, Marginalization, and Subversion in Cosplay”. USF Tampa graduate theses and dissertations. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/etd/6749
   Google Scholar
• Richards, K. A. R., & Hemphill, M. A. (2018). A practical guide to collaborative qualitative data analysis. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 37(2), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2017-0084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Román, D., & Busch, K. C. (2016). Textbooks of doubt: Using systemic functional analysis to explore the framing of climate change in middle-school science textbooks. Environmental Education Research, 22(8), 1158–1180. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1091878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, R. S., & Letamendi, A. M. (2018). Personality, behavioral, and social heterogeneity within the cosplay community. Transformative Works and Cultures, 28. https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2018.1535
   Google Scholar
• Rubega, M. A., Burgio, K. R., MacDonald, A. A. M., Oeldorf-Hirsch, A., Capers, R. S., & Wyss, R. (2020). Assessment by audiences shows little effect of science communication training. Science Communication, 139–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020971639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearer, A., Paredes, I. J., Ahmad, T., & Jackson, C. (2020, October 8). Yes, science is political. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/yes-science-is-political/
   Google Scholar
• Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Stofer, K. A., Lundgren, L., Dunckel, B. A., Krieger, J., James, V., & Lange, M. (2019b). Public engagement on climate and health in museums and community discussions may foster behavior change. Journal of STEM Outreach, 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.15695/jstem/v2i1.10
   Google Scholar
• Stofer, K. A., Rujimora, J., Sblendorio, D., Duqueney, E., Tatineni, M., & Gaudier, G. (2019a). Casual conversations in everyday spaces can promote high public engagement with science. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 9(4), 296–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2019.1670882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoneburg, B., Perez, V., Lundgren, L., Ziegler, M., & Santos, G.-P. (2020). Cosplay for science: Leveraging pop culture to make science more accessible. Exhibition, Fall, 100–103.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, M. (2024). Con artist: Non-cosplay participation at popular culture conventions as an arts-based method of inquiring Into resistance and the undoing of rules. Qualitative Inquiry, 30(2), 257–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004231176095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, L. (2022, April 17). Building a climate of hope. Association of Children’s Museums.
   Google Scholar
• Trench, B. (2017). Universities, science communication and professionalism. JCOM, 16(05), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.16050302
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan, P. W., Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Swalehe, R. M. (2000). Entertainment-education and HIV/AIDS prevention: A field experiment in Tanzania. Journal of Health Communication, 5(Supplement), 81–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamato, E. (2020). Self-identification in Malaysian cosplay. Transformative Works and Cultures, 34. https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2020.1771
   Google Scholar
• Zehr, E. P. (2014). Avengers Assemble! Using pop-culture icons to communicate science. Advances in Physiology Education, 38(2), 118–123. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00146.2013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar