Exploring provider perspectives of the STEM club landscape: findings from one Australian state

References

• Allen, S., & Peterman, K. (2019). Evaluating informal STEM education: Issues and challenges in context. New Directions for Evaluation, 2019(161), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20354
   Google Scholar
• Australian Industry Group (AIG). (2017). Strengthening school-industry STEM skills partnerships. https://cdn.aigroup.com.au/Reports/2017/AiGroup_OCS_STEM_Report_2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be (com) ing a knowing researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health, 24(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burrows, A., Lockwood, M., Borowczak, M., Janak, E., & Barber, B. (2018). Integrated STEM: Focus on informal education and community collaboration through engineering. Education Sciences, 8(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8010004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2020). When teachers learn how to provide classroom structure in an autonomy-supportive way: Benefits to teachers and their students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 90, 103004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.103004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çolakoğlu, J., Steegh, A., & Parchmann, I. (2023). Reimagining informal STEM learning opportunities to foster STEM identity development in underserved learners. Frontiers in Education, 8(1082747), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1082747
   Google Scholar
• Conradty, C., & Bogner, F. X. (2019). From STEM to STEAM: Cracking the code? How creativity & motivation interacts with inquiry-based learning. Creativity Research Journal, 31(3), 284–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1641678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dare, E. A., Ellis, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2018). Understanding science teachers’ implementations of integrated STEM curricular units through a phenomenological multiple case study. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0101-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, K., Fitzgerald, A., Power, M., Leach, T., Martin, N., Piper, S., Singh, R., & Dunlop, S. (2023). Understanding quality learning and teaching in STEM clubs: What does the evidence base tell us? Studies in Science Education, 59(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2021.1969168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denson, C., Austin, C., Hailey, C., & Householder, D. (2015). Benefits of informal learning environments: A focused examination of STEM-based program environments. Journal of STEM Education, 16(1), 11–15.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Training. (2014). A strategy for STEM in Queensland state schools. https://advancingeducation.qld.gov.au/ourPlan/Documents/schools-of-the-future-stem-strategy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Education Council. (2015). National STEM school education strategy, 2016–2026. https://www.education.gov.au/education-ministers-meeting/resources/national-stem-school-education-strategy
   Google Scholar
• English, L. (2017). Advancing elementary and middle school STEM education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(S1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9802-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, M., & Boucher, A. R. (2015). Optimizing the power of choice: Supporting student autonomy to foster motivation and engagement in learning. Mind, Brain, and Education, 9(2), 87–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, A., Davis, K., Martin, N., Leach, T., & Dunlop, S. (2019). The STEM club research journey [Report]. Inspiring Australia and Queensland Museum.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, A., Haeusler, C., & Pfeiffer, L. (Eds.). (2020a). More than coding. STEM education in primary classrooms. In STEM education in primary classrooms: Unravelling contemporary approaches in Australia and New Zealand (pp. 1–11). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, A., Leach, T., Davis, K., Martin, N., & Dunlop, S. (2020b). Informal spaces for STEM learning: STEM Clubs. In A. Fitzgerald, C. Haeusler, & L. Pfeiffer (Eds.), STEM education in primary classrooms: Unravelling contemporary approaches in Australia and New Zealand (pp. 168–187). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, G., Namey, E., & Mitchell, M. (Eds.). (2013). Sampling. In Collecting qualitative data: A field manual for applied research (pp. 41–74). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506374680
   Google Scholar
• Holmlund, T., Lesseig, K., & Slavit, D. (2018). Making sense of “STEM education” in K-12 contexts. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(32), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0127-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hume, A., & Coll, R. (2010). Authentic student inquiry: The mismatch between the intended curriculum and the student-experienced curriculum. Research in Science & Technological Education, 28(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140903513565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallio, H., Pietilä, A.-M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotys-Schwartz, D., Besterfield-Sacre, M., & Shuman, L. (2011). Informal learning in engineering education: Where we are – Where we need to go. In 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. T4J–1–T4J–7). https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2011.6142836
   Google Scholar
• LópezLeiva, C., Roberts-Harris, D., & Von Toll, E. (2016). Meaning making with motion is messy: Developing a STEM learning community. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 16(2), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2016.1166293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, N. I., Kelly, N., & Terry, P. C. (2018). A framework for self-determination in massive open online courses: Design for autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(2), 35–55. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, G., Carter, H., Boedeker, P., Knowles, E., Buckmiller, C., & Eames, J. (2024). A meta-analysis and quality review of mathematics interventions conducted in informal learning environments with caregivers and children. Review of Educational Research, 94(1), 112–152. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231156182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygren, H., Nissinen, K., Hämäläinen, R., & De Wever, B. (2019). Lifelong learning: Formal, non-formal and informal learning in the context of the use of problem-solving skills in technology-rich environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1759–1770. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PwC. (2016). Making STEM a primary priority: Practical steps to improve the quality of science and mathematics teaching in Australian primary schools. https://www.pwc.com.au/pdf/making-stem-a-primary-priority.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, T., Jackson, C., Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., Bush, S. B., Maiorca, C., Cavalcanti, M., & Cremeans, C. (2018). Students’ perceptions of STEM learning after participating in a summer informal learning experience. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0133-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. The Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806
   Google Scholar
• Sefton-Green, J. (2013). Learning at not-school: A review of study, theory, and advocacy for education in non-formal settings. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9351.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Shahali, E. H. M., Ismail, I., & Halim, L. (2017). STEM education in Malaysia: Policy, trajectories and initiatives. Asian Research Policy, 8(2), 122–133.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, O. G., & Jordan, M. E. (2017). “Some explanation here”: A case study of learning opportunities and tensions in an informal science learning environment. Instructional Science, 45(2), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9396-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suri, H. (2011). Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis. Qualitative Research Journal, 11(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ1102063
   Google Scholar
• Thanh, N. C., & Thanh, T. T. (2015). The interconnection between interpretivist paradigm and qualitative methods in education. American Journal of Educational Science, 1(2), 24–27.
   Google Scholar
• Timms, M. J., Moyle, K., Weldon, P. R., & Mitchell, P. (2018). Challenges in STEM learning in Australian schools: Literature and policy review. https://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1028&context=policy_analysis_misc
   Google Scholar
• Tytler, R., Symington, D., Williams, G., & White, P. (2018). Enlivening STEM education through school-community partnerships. In R. Jorgensen & K. Larkin (Eds.), STEM education in the junior secondary (pp. 249–272). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5448-8_12
   Google Scholar
• Warren, M. A. (2005). Communities and schools: A new view of urban education reform. Harvard Educational Review, 75(2), 133–173. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.75.2.m718151032167438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, K. (2016). First 5 forever: Creating opportunities for all Queensland children. Educating Young Children: Learning and Teaching in the Early Childhood Years, 22(2), 23–25. https://search.informit.org/doi/epdf/10.3316informit.344317120105875
   Google Scholar
• Wiseman, D., Beatty, R., & Carter, E. (2020). Whole-some artifacts: (STEM) teaching and learning emerging from and contributing to community. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 20(2), 264–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-020-00079-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolnough, B. (2001). Of ‘knowing science’ and of ‘doing science’: A reaffirmation of the tacit and the affective in science and science education. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 1(3), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150109556469
   Google Scholar
• Yuen, T., Ek, L., & Scheutze, A. (2013). Increasing participation from underrepresented minorities in STEM through robotics clubs. In Proceedings of 2013 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE) (pp. 24–28). https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE.2013.6654392
   Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K., Payne, K., & Brayko, K. (2015). Democratizing teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(2), 122–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114560908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucker, T. A., Maldonado, G. Y., Assel, M., McCallum, C., Elias, C., Swint, J. M., & Lal, L. (2022). Informal science, technology, engineering and math learning conditions to increase parent involvement with young children experiencing poverty. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(1015590), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015590
   Google Scholar