Arctic indigenous representation in national parliaments

Bibliography

• Ackrén, M., and U. Jakobsen. “Greenland As a Self-Governing Sub-National Territory in International Relations: Past, Current and Future Perspectives.” The Polar Record 51, no. 4 (2015): 404–12. doi:10.1017/S003224741400028X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andeweg, R.B. “Beyond Representativeness? Trends in Political Representation.” European Review 11, no. 2 (2003): 147–61. doi:10.1017/S1062798703000164.
   Google Scholar
• Barreto, M.A., G.R. Sanchez, and H.L. Walker. “Battling the Hydra: The Disparate Impact of Voter ID Requirements in North Dakota.” Journal of Race, Ethnicity, & Politics 7, no. 1 (2022): 119–40. doi:10.1017/rep.2022.1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berg, J., and J. Saglie. “Self-Determination As a Political Cleavage: The Norwegian Samediggi Election of 2009.” In Indigenous Politics. Institutions, Representation and Mobilisation, ed. M. Berg-Nordlie, J. Saglie, and A. Sullivan, 191–213. Milton Keynes, UK: ECPR Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Black, J. “Ethnoracial Minorities in the Canadian House of Commons: The Case of the 36th Parliament. 2000.” Canadian Ethnic Studies 32, no. 2 (2000): 105–14.
   Google Scholar
• Boehmke, F.J., and R.C. Witmer. “Representation and Lobbying by Indian Nations in California: Is Tribal Lobbying All About Gaming?” Interest Groups & Advocacy 9, no. 1 (2020): 80–101. doi:10.1057/s41309-019-00078-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, K.M. “Making Strategic Choices: How and Why Indian Groups Advocated for Federal Recognition from 1977 to 2012.” Law & Society Review 51, no. 4 (2017): 930–65. doi:10.1111/lasr.12299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, K.M. “Beyond Descriptive Representation: American Indian Opposition to Federal Legislation.” Journal of Race, Ethnicity, & Politics 7, no. 1 (2022): 65–89. doi:10.1017/rep.2021.38.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, K.M. “Congress and Indians.” Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics 7, no. 1 (2022): 65–89. doi:10.1017/rep.2021.38.
   Google Scholar
• Carrière, R., and R. Koop. “Indigenous Political Representation in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 56, no. 2 (2023): 257–78. doi:10.1017/S0008423923000173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celis, K., and S. Childs. Feminist Democratic Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Celis, K., and S. Erzeel. “Beyond the Usual Suspects: Non-Left, Male and Non-Feminist MPs and the Substantive Representation of Women.” Government and Opposition 50, no. 1 (2015): 45–64. doi:10.1017/gov.2013.42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childs, S., and J. Withey. “Women Representatives Acting for Women: Sex and the Signing of Early Day Motions in the 1997 British Parliament.” Political Studies 52, no. 3 (2004): 552–64. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00495.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, P., M.M.S. Harder, E. Nauclér, and R.C. Alomar. “Parliamentary Representation of Overseas Territories in the Metropolis: A Comparative Analysis.” Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 60, no. 3 (2022): 229–53. doi:10.1080/14662043.2022.2065623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conner, T.W. “Exploring Voting Behavior on American Indian Legislation in the United States Congress.” The Social Science Journal 51, no. 2 (2014): 159–66. doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2014.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corntassel, J.J. “American Indian Tribal Government Support of Office-Seekers: Findings from the 1994 Election.” The Social Science Journal 34, no. 4 (1997): 511–25. doi:10.1016/S0362-3319(97)90009-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlerup, D. Has Democracy Failed Women?, Vol. 2018. Democratic Futures Series. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Erik, B., and F.P. Jensen. “Greenland on the Path to Constitutional Equality.” In Phasing Out the Colonial Status of Greenland 1945-54. A Historical Study, ed. E. Beukel, F.P. Jensen, and J.E. Rytter, 2477–286. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Espirito-Santo, A., A. Freire, and S. Serra-Silva. “Does Women’s Descriptive Representation Matter for Policy Preferences? The Role of Political Parties.” Party Politics 26, no. 2 (2020): 227–37. doi:10.1177/1354068818764011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink, A. “Conducting Research Literature Reviews.” From the Internet to Paper. Fourth. USA: SAGE, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Gad, U.P. “Greenland Projecting Sovereignty: Denmark Protecting Sovereignty Away.” In European Integration and Postcolonial Sovereignty Games: The EU Overseas Countries and Territories, ed. R. Adler-Nissen and U.P. Gad, 217–230. London: Routledge, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Grace, J., and M. Sawer. “Representing Gender Equality: Specialised Parliamentary Bodies.” Parliamentary Affairs 69, no. 4 (2016): 745–47. doi:10.1093/pa/gsw004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harder, M.M.S. “Pitkin’s Second Way: Freeing Representation Theory from Identity.” Representation 56, no. 1 (2020): 1–12. doi:10.1080/00344893.2019.1636853.
   Google Scholar
• Harder, M.M.S. “Færøske og grønlandske mandater i Folketinget.” Politica 54, no. 1 (2022): 5–22. doi:10.7146/politica.v54i1.130590.
   Google Scholar
• Harder, M.M.S. “Parting with ‘Interests of Women’: How Feminist Scholarship on Substantive Representation Could Replace ‘Women’s interests’ with ‘Gender Equality interests’.” European Journal of Politics and Gender 6, no. 3 (2023): 377–94. doi:10.1332/251510821X16742321076420.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, H. Partigrupperne i Folketinget. København: Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlaf, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Josefsen, E. The Sami and the National Parliaments. Channels of Political Influence. Mexico: IPU and UNDP, 2003. http://archive.ipu.org/splze/Chiapas10/saami.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Josefsen, E. “An Indigenous Parliament?: Realities and Perspectives in Russia and the.” In The Experiences of Sapmi, ed. K. Wessendorf, 178–210. IWGIA Documents 115. Copenhagen: IWGIA, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Josefsen, E., U. Mörkenstam, and J. Saglie. “Different Institutions within Similar States: The Norwegian and Swedish Sámediggis.” Global Review of Ethnopolitics 14, no. 1 (2015): 32–51. doi:10.1080/17449057.2014.926611.
   Google Scholar
• Kittilson, C. “Women, Parties and Platforms in Post-Industrial Democracies.” Party Politics 17, no. 1 (2011): 66–92. doi:10.1177/1354068809361012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, J.W. “Voter Registration and Political Knowledge Among American Indians.” Journal of Race, Ethnicity, & Politics 7, no. 1 (2022): 165–84. doi:10.1017/rep.2020.43.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, R., and U. Mörkenstam. “Indigenous Self-Determination Through a Government Agency? The Impossible Task of the Swedish Sámediggi.” International Journal on Minority & Group Rights 23, no. 1 (2016): 105–27. doi:10.1163/15718115-02301004.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, S.M. “The Canadian Senate: An Institution of Reconciliation?” Journal of Canadian Studies 54, no. 1 (2020): 1–24. doi:10.3138/jcs.2019-0003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J. “Rethinking Representation.” The American Political Science Review 97, no. 4 (2003): 515–28. doi:10.1017/S0003055403000856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J. “Clarifying the Concept of Representation.” The American Political Science Review 105, no. 3 (2011): 621–30. doi:10.1017/S0003055411000189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, S. “Parliamentary Questions, the Behaviour of Legislators, and the Function of Legislatures: An Introduction.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 17, no. 3 (2011): 259–70. doi:10.1080/13572334.2011.595120.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, T. “The Two-Row Wampum: Has This Metaphor for Co-Existence Run Its Course?” Canadian Parliamentary Review 2019 (2019): 21.28.
   Google Scholar
• Morden, M.D. “Indigenizing Parliament: Time to Re-Start a Conversation.” Canadian Parliamentary Review 2016 (2016): 24–33.
   Google Scholar
• Morden, M.D. “Parliament and the Representation of Indigenous Issues: The Canadian Case.” Parliamentary Affairs 71, no. 1 (2018): 124–43. doi:10.1093/pa/gsx009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, R., S. Dahlberg, and U. Mörkenstam. Sametingsval: Väljare, Partier Och Media. Stockholm: Santérus Förlag, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Oesert, M.D. “Tribal Citizen Participation in State and National Politics: Welcome Wagon or Trojan Horse?” William Mitchell Law Review 36, no. 2 (2010): 793–858.
   Google Scholar
• Ouellette, R.-F. “Honouring Indigenous Languages within Parliament.” Canadian Parliamentary Review 2019 (2019): 3–5.
   Google Scholar
• Pitkin, H. The Concept of Representation. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, R. Indigenous Representation and Political Parties in Canada and Latin America, Edited by José Antonio Lucero, Dale Turner, and Donna Lee VanCott. Oxford University Press, 2013. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195386653.013.005.
   Google Scholar
• Rocha, R.R., and R.D. Wrinkle. “Gender, Ethnicity, and Support for Bilingual Education: Will Just Any Woman or Latino Do? A Contingent ‘No’.” Policy Studies Journal 39, no. 2 (2011): 309–28. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00409.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saalfeld, T. “Parliamentary Questions As Instruments of Substantive Representation: Visible Minorities in the UK House of Commons, 2005–10.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 17, no. 3 (2011): 271–89. doi:10.1080/13572334.2011.595121.
   Google Scholar
• Saward, M. “The Representative Claim.” Contemporary Political Theory 5, no. 3 (2006): 297–318. doi:10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300234.
   Google Scholar
• Saward, M. The Representative Claim. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Schouls, T. “Aboriginal Peoples and Electoral Reform in Canada: Differentiated Representation versus Voter Equality.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 29, no. 4 (1996): 729–49. doi:10.1017/s0008423900014451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M.A., W.K. Novak, and M.J. Oleszek. “Legal and Procedural Issues Related to Seating a Cherokee Nation Delegate in the House of Representatives.” R47190. Congressional Research Service Report. Washington DC: U.S. Congress, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Senninger, R. “Issue Expansion and Selective Scrutiny – How Opposition Parties Used Parliamentary Questions About the European Union in the National Arena from 1973 to 2013.” European Union Politics 18, no. 2 (2017): 283–306. doi:10.1177/1465116516662155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Severs, E. “Representation as Claims‐Making. Quid Responsiveness?” Representation 46, no. 4 (2010): 411–23. doi:10.1080/00344893.2010.518081.
   Google Scholar
• Squires, J. “The Constitutive Representation of Gender: Extra- Parliamentary Representations of Gender Relations.” Representation 44, no. 2 (2008): 187–204. doi:10.1080/00344890802080464.
   Google Scholar
• Wängnerud, L. “Women in Parliaments: Descriptive and Substantive Representation.” Annual Review of Political Science 12, no. 1 (2009): 51–69. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.123839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, D.E., and H.S. Kiiwetinepinesiik. American Indian Politics and the American Political System. 4th ed. USA: Rowman & Littlefield, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M.S. “Sharing the River: Aboriginal Representation in Canadian Political Institutions.” 2004.
   Google Scholar