Social Constructivism and Beyond. On the Double Bind Between Politics and Science

References

• Bettini, G. (2013). Climate Barbarians at the gate? A critique of apocalyptic narratives on ‘climate refugees’. Geoforum, 45, 63–72.10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (2002). From science to emancipation. Alienation and the actuality of enlightenment. New Delhi: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (2008). A realist theory of science. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Braeckman, A. (2015). Neoliberalism and the symbolic institution of society. Pitting foucault against lefort on the state and the ‘political’. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 41(9), 945–962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, U., Bullard, N., Lander, E., & Mueller, T. (2009). Radical climate change politics in Copenhagen and beyond: From criticism to action? Critical Currents, 6, 9–16.
   Google Scholar
• Cristi, R. (1998). Carl Schmitt and authoritarian liberalism: Strong state, Free Economy. Cardiff: Cardiff University of Wales Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dedecker, J.-M. (2010). De aarde warmt op en de geesten verhitten: Ecologisme als nieuwe machtige religie. Leuven: Van Halewyck.
   Google Scholar
• Demeritt, D. (2001). The construction of global warming and the politics of science. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91(2), 307–337.10.1111/0004-5608.00245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demeritt, D. (2006). Science studies, climate change and the prospects for constructivist critique. Economy and Society, 35(3), 453–479.10.1080/03085140600845024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, B. (2005). The philosophy of Claude Lefort. Interpreting the political. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. (1995). Boundaries of science. In S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (revised ed., pp. 393–443). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Goeminne, G. (2010). Climate policy is dead, long live climate politics! Ethics, Place and Environment, 13(2), 207–214.10.1080/13668791003778867
   Google Scholar
• Goeminne, G. (2012). Lost in translation: Climate denial and the return of the political. Global Environmental Politics, 12(2), 1–8.10.1162/GLEP_a_00104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goeminne, G. (2013). Science, technology and the political: The (Im)possibility of democratic rationalization. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 17(1), 93–123.
   Google Scholar
• Heynen, N., Kaika, M., & Swyngedouw, E. (2006). Urban political ecology. Politicizing the production of urban natures. In N. Heynen, M. Kaika, & E. Swyngedouw (Eds.), In the nature of cities. Urban political ecology and the politics of urban metabolism (pp. 1–19). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2007). The fourth assesment synthesis repport. Summary for policymakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacques, P. (2008). Ecology, distribution, and identity in the world politics of environmental skepticism. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 19(3), 8–28.10.1080/10455750802348762
   Google Scholar
• Kenis, A., & Lievens, M. (2014). Searching for ‘the political’ in environmental politics. Environmental Politics, 23(4), 531–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenis, A., & Lievens, M. (2015). The limits of the green economy. From re-inventing capitalism to re-politicising the present. Routledge Studies in Environmental Policy, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kenis, A., & Lievens, M. (2017). Imagining the carbon neutral city: The (post)politics of time and space. Environment and Planning A, 49(8), 1762–1778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., & Bhaskar, R. (2007). Discourse theory vs. critical realism. Journal of Critical Realism, 1(2), 9–14.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2001). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2004a). Politics of nature. How to bring the sciences into democracy. Harvard: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2004b). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2), 225–248.10.1086/421123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefort, C. (1986). The political forms of modern society. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lefort, C. (1988). Democracy and political theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lomborg, B. (2001). The skeptical environmentalist: Measuring the real state of the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139626378
   Google Scholar
• Lomborg, B. (2007). Cool it: The skeptical environmentalist’s guide to global warming. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Macgregor, S. (2014). Only resist: Feminist ecological citizenship and the post-politics of climate change. Hypatia, 29(3), 617–633.10.1111/hypa.2014.29.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machin, A. (2013). Negotiating climate change. Radical democracy and the illusion of consensus. New York, NY: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Maeseele, P. (2015). Beyond the post-political Zeitgeist. In A. Hansen & R. Cox (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of environment and communication (pp. 429–443). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marchart, O. (2007). Post-foundational political thought: Political difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.3366/edinburgh/9780748624973.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (1993). The return of the political. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2006). On the political. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics. Thinking the world politically. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Oosterlynck, S., & Swyngedouw, E. (2010). Noise reduction: The post-political quandary of night flights at Brussels airport. Environment & Planning A, 42(7), 1577–1594.10.1068/a42269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2010). Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pepermans, Y. (2015). Manufacturing climate consent. From a depoliticized consensus to politicized debate ( PhD). University of Antwerp, Antwerp.
   Google Scholar
• Pepermans, Y., & Maeseele, P. (2014). Democratic debate and mediated discourses on climate change: From consensus to de/politicization. Environmental Communication, 8(2), 216–232.10.1080/17524032.2014.906482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, C. (1988). Political theology. Four chapters on the concept of sovereignty. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, C. (1996). The concept of the political. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, C. (1998). Strong state and sound economy: An address to business leaders. In R. Cristi (Ed.), Carl Schmitt and authoritarian liberalism: Strong state, free economy (pp. 212–232). Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, B. (2013). Democracy beyond the political. In M. Plot (Ed.), Claude Lefort: Thinker of the political (pp. 186–202). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2007). Impossible ‘sustainability’ and the postpolitical condition. In R. J. Krueger & D. Gibbs (Eds.), The sustainable development paradox (pp. 185–205). London: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2009). The antinomies of the postpolitical city. In search of a democratic politics of environmental production. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(3), 601–620.10.1111/ijur.2009.33.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2010a). Apocalypse forever? Theory, Culture & Society, 27, 213–232.10.1177/0263276409358728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2010b). Trouble with nature: ‘ecology as the new opium for the masses’. In P. Healey & J. Hillier (Eds.), Conceptual challenges for planning theory (pp. 299–320). London: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2011). Depoliticized environments: The end of nature, climate change and the postpolitical condition. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 69, 253–274.10.1017/S1358246111000300
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2013). The non-political politics of climate change. ACME: An International E-Journal of Critical Geographies, 12(1), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E., & Heynen, N. C. (2003). Urban political ecology, justice and the politics of scale. Antipode, 35(5), 898–918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E., & Kaika, M. (2014). Urban political ecology great promises, deadlock … and new beginnings? Documents d’Anàlisi Geogràfica, 60(3), 459–481.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. (2011). Climate change and society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. (2010). Strange weather, again. Climate science as political art. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(2–3), 289–305.10.1177/0263276410361499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zizek, S. (2007). Censorship today: Violence, or ecology as the new opium for the masses. Retrieved from http://www.lacan.com/zizecology1.htm
   Google Scholar