Commutative Justice and Access and Benefit Sharing for Genetic Resources

References

• Anwander, N., Bachmann, A., Rippe, K. P., & Schaber, P. (2002). Gene patentieren, Eine ethische Analyse. Paderborn: Mentis.
   Google Scholar
• Aquinas, T. (1993). Summa theologiae, electronic edition (English Dominican Fathers, Trans.). Charlottesville, VA: InteLex Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. (1992). Nicomachean ethics, electronic edition (W. D. Ross, Trans.). Charlottesville, VA: InteLex Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, C. (2014). Against ‘permanent sovereignty’ over natural resources. Politics Philosophy Economics, 1–23. doi:10.1177/1470594X14523080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beattie, A. J. (2005). New products and industries from biodiversity. In R. M. Hassan, R. Scholes, & N. Ash (Eds.), Ecosystms and human well-being: Current state and trends. findings of the condition and trends working group (pp. 273–295). London: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biswas, K., Chattopadhyay, I., Banerjee, R. K., & Bandyopadhyay, U. (2002). Biological activities and medicianal properties of neem (Azadirachata indica). Current Science, 82(11), 1336–1345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody, B. A. (2010). Intellectual property, state sovereignty, and biotechnology. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 20(1), 51–73.10.1353/ken.0.0306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck, M., & Hamilton, C. (2011). The Nagoya protocol on access to genetic resources and the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from their utilization to the convention on biological diversity. RECIEL, 20(1), 47–61. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9388.2011.00703.x
   Google Scholar
• Caney, S. (2001). International distributive justice. Political Studies, 49, 974–997.10.1111/1467-9248.00351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conniff, R. (2012). A bitter pill. Conservation, 13. Retrieved September 2016, from http://conservationmagazine.org/2012/2003/a-bitter-pill/
   Google Scholar
• Dauda, B., & Dierickx, K. (2013). Benefit sharing: An exploration on the contextual discourse of a changing concept. BMC Medical Ethics, 14(36), 1–8. doi:10.1186/1472-6939-14-36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jonge, B. (2011). What is fair and equitable benefit-sharing? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 24, 127–146. doi:10.1007/s10806-010-9249-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jonge, B., & Korthals, M. (2006). Vicissitudes of benefit sharing of crop genetic resources: Downstream and upstream. Developing World Bioethics, 6(3), 144–157. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8847.2006.00167.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greiber, T., Moreno, S. P., Ahren, M., Carrasco, J. N., Kamau, E. C., Medaglia, J. C., … Perron-Welch, F. (2012). An explanatory guide to the Nagoya protocol on access and benefit-sharing. IUCN Environmental Law Centre. Retrieved September 2016, from https://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/an_explanatory_guide_to_the_nagoya_protocol.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kamau, E. C., Fedder, B., & Winter, G. (2010). The Nagoya protocol on access to genetic resources and benefit sharing: What is new and what are the implications for provider and user countries and the scientific community? LEAD, 6(3), 246–262.
   Google Scholar
• Korthals, M., & De Jonge, B. (2009). Two different ethical notions of benefit sharing of genetic resources and their implications for global development. New Genetics and Society, 28(1), 87–95. doi:10.1080/14636770802670308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koslowski, P. (2001). Commutative justice. Principles of Ethical Economy, 184–210. Springer.10.1007/978-94-010-0956-0
   Google Scholar
• Millum, J. (2010). How should the benefits of bioprospecting be shared? The Hastings Center report, 40(1), 24–33.10.1353/hcr.0.0227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuffield Council on Bioethics. (2002). The ethics of patenting DNA, a discussion paper. Retrieved September 2016, from http://nuffieldbioethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/The-ethics-of-patenting-DNA-a-discussion-paper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oberthür, S., & Rosendal, K. G. (2013). Global governance of genetic resources, Background and analytical framework. In S. Oberthür & K. G. Rosendal (Eds.), Global governance of genetic resources, access and benefit sharing after the Nagoya protocol (pp. 1–17). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Paavola, J. (2008). Resources. In W. A. Darity (Ed.), International encyclopediao of the social sciences (pp. 211–212). Michigan: Gale.
   Google Scholar
• Pillay, N. (2013). Free, prior and informed consent of Indigenous peoples. Retrieved September 2016, from http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/IPeoples/FreePriorandInformedConsent.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, D. G. (1894). Aristotle’s subdivisions of ‘particular justice’. The Classical Review, 8(5), 185–192.10.1017/S0009840X00188031
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, D. (2006). Benefit sharing: From obscurity to common knowledge. Developing World Bioethics, 6(3), ii. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8847.2006.00176.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, D. (2007). Benefit sharing: It’s time fr a definition. Journal of Medical Ethics, 33, 205–209. doi:10.1136/jme.2006.016790
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, D., & Pisupati, B. (2010). Ethics, justice and the convention on biological diversity. UNEP. Retrieved September 2016, from http://www.unep.org/delc/Portals/119/UNEP_Justice_Final_V2a.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schuppert, F. (2014). Beyond the national resource privilege: Towards an international court of the environment. International Theory, 6(1), 68–97. doi:10.1017/S1752971913000262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan, C. (2005). EPO neem patent revocation revives biopiracy debate. Nature Biotechnology, 23(5), 511–512. doi:10.1038/nbt0505-511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stumpf, K. (2014). Reconstrutiong the ‘biopiracy’ debate from a justice perspective. In D. Lanzerath & M. Friele (Eds.), Concepts and values in biodiversity (pp. 225–242). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tobin, B. M. (2013). Bridging the Nagoy compliance gap: The fundamental role of customary law in protection of Indigenous peoples’ resource and knowledge rights. Law, Environment and Developmen Journal, 9(2), 142–162.
   Google Scholar
• UN. (1992). Convention on biodiversity (CBD). Retrieved September 2016, from http://www.cbd.int/convention/text/
   Google Scholar
• UN. (2010, September). Nagoya protocol on access to genetic resources and the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from their utilization to the convention on biological diversity. Retrieved from http://www.cbd.int/abs/doc/protocol/nagoya-protocol-en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wallbott, L., Wolff, F., & Pozarowska, J. (2013). The negotiations of the Nagoya protocol, issues, coalitions and processes. In S. Oberthür & K. G. Rosendal (Eds.), Global governance of genetic resources, access and benefit sharing after the Nagoya protocol (pp. 33–59). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wynberg, R. (2005). Rhetoric, realism and benefit-sharing, use of treditional knowledge of hoodia species in the development of an appetite suppressant. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 7(6), 851–876. doi:10.1111/j.1747-1796.2004.tb00231.x
   Google Scholar