Institutional Legitimacy and Geoengineering Governance

References

• Adams, N. P. (2018). Institutional legitimacy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 26(1), 84–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2011). The trouble with transparency: A critical review of openness in e-government. Policy & Internet, 3(1), 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Beitz, C. R. (1989). Political equality: An essay in democratic theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A. (2003). Justice, legitimacy, and self-determination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A. (2013). The heart of human rights. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199325382.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A. (2018). Institutional legitimacy. In: D. Sobel, P. Vallentyne, & S. Wall (Eds.), Oxford studies in political philosophy (Vol. 4, pp. 53–78). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A., & Keohane, R. O. (2006). The legitimacy of global governance institutions. Ethics & International Affairs, 20(4), 405–437.
   Google Scholar
• Callies, D.E. (2018). The slippery slope argument against geoengineering research. Journal of Applied Philosophy, doi:10.1111/japp.12345
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R. (2013). Taking rights seriously. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A. (2010). Is transparency the best disinfectant? Journal of Political Philosophy, 18(4), 389–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner, S. M. (2004). Ethics and global climate change. Ethics, 114(3), 555–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner, S. M. (2011). A perfect moral storm: The ethical tragedy of climate change. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gardiner, S. M. (2016a). Debating climate ethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gardiner, S. M., & Fragniere, A. (2018). The tollgate principles for the governance of geoengineering: Moving beyond the oxford principles to an ethically more robust approach. Ethics, Policy and Environment. Forthcoming.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampshire, S. (1993). Liberalism: The new twist. New York review of books 40(14), 43–47.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, H. L. A. (1998). The concept of law (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heyward, C. (2013). Situating and abandoning geoengineering: A typology of five responses to dangerous climate change. PS: Political Science & Politics, 46(01), 23–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, J. (2011). Geoengineering and the myth of unilateralism: Pressures and prospects for international cooperation. Stanford Journal of Law, Science & Policy, 4, 56–69.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, J. B., & Keith, D. (2016). Solar geoengineering and obligations to the global poor. In: C. J. Preston (Ed.), Climate justice and geoengineering: Ethics and policy in the atmospheric Anthropocene (pp. 79–92). London; New York: Rowman & Littlefield International, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Hourdequin, M. (2018). Climate change, climate engineering, and the 'global poor': what does justice require? Ethics, Policy and Environment. Forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, D. (1996). Ethics and intentional climate change. Climatic Change, 33(3), 323–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, D. (2014). Reason in a dark time: Why the struggle against climate change failed–and what it means for our future. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jinnah, S. (2018). Governing geoengineering research: the role of an advisory commission in orchestrating experimental governance in California. Ethics, Policy and Environment. Forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Korsgaard, C. M. (2003). Realism and constructivism in twentieth-century moral philosophy. Journal of Philosophical Research, 28, 99–122.
   Google Scholar
• LaFrance, A. (2016, April 26). Genetically modified mosquitoes: What could possibly go wrong? The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/04/genetically-modified-mosquitoes-zika/479793/
   Google Scholar
• Maskin, E., & Tirole, J. (2004). The politician and the judge: Accountability in government. American Economic Review, 94(4), 1034–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow, D. (2017b). International governance of climate engineering: A survey of reports on climate engineering, 2009-2015. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2982392
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, D. R., Kopp, R., & Oppenheimer, M. (2013). Political legitimacy in decisions about experiments in solar radiation management. In W. C. G. Burns & A. Strauss (Eds.), Climate change geoengineering: Philosophical perspectives, legal issues, and governance frameworks (pp. 146–167). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, D. R. (2017a). Fairness in allocating the global emissions budget. Environmental Values, 26(6), 669–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, O. (2006). Transparency and the ethics of communication. In: C. Hood & D. Heald (Eds.), Transparency: The key to better governance? (pp. 74–90). Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peter, F. (2014, Winter). Political legitimacy. In. E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/legitimacy/
   Google Scholar
• Preston, C. J. (2018). Recognitional justice, climate engineering, and the care approach. Ethics, Policy and Environment. Forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (2005). Political liberalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, S., Heyward, C., Kruger, T., Pidgeon, N., Redgwell, C., & Savulescu, J. (2013). The Oxford principles. Climatic Change, 121(3), 499–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, A. J. (2001). Justification and legitimacy; essays on rights and obligations. Cambridge, Mass: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P. T. (2018). Legitimacy and non-domination in solar radiation management research. Ethics, Policy and Environment. Forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1997). The theory of social and economic organization. (T. Parsons, Trans.). New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, P.-H. (2016). Consenting to geoengineering. Philosophy & Technology, 29(2), 173–188.
   Google Scholar