4,779
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Climate Change, Climate Engineering, and the ‘Global Poor’: What Does Justice Require?

References

  • Buchanan, A. (2002). Social moral epistemology. Social Philosophy & Policy, 19, 126–152.
  • Carr, W., & Preston, C. J. (2017). Skewed vulnerabilities and moral corruption in global perspectives on climate engineering. Environmental Values, 26(6), 757–777.
  • Carr, W., Yung, L., & Preston, C. (2014). Swimming upstream: Engaging the american public early on climate engineering. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 70(3), 38–48.
  • Carr, W. A., Preston, C. J., Yung, L., Szerszynski, B., Keith, D. W., & Mercer, A. M. (2013). Public engagement on solar radiation management and why it needs to happen now. Climatic Change, 121(3), 567–577.
  • Corner, A., Pidgeon, N., & Parkhill, K. (2012). Perceptions of geoengineering: Public attitudes, stakeholder perspectives, and the challenge of ‘upstream’ engagement. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 3(5), 451–466.
  • Dunne, D. (2017, October 11). Geoengineering: scientists in Berlin debate radical ways to reverse global warming. CarbonBrief, Retrieved March 5, 2018, from https://www.carbonbrief.org/geoengineering-scientists-berlin-debate-radicaly-ways-reverse-global-warming
  • Dworkin, G. (2017). Paternalism. In: E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2017 Edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/paternalism/. Accessed December 26, 2018.
  • Figueroa, R., & Mills, C. (2001). Environmental justice. In: D. Jamieson (Ed.), A companion to environmental philosophy (pp. 426–438). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Figueroa, R. M. (2011). Indigenous peoples and cultural losses. In: J.S. Dryzek, R.B. Norgaard, and D. Schlosberg (Eds.),  The Oxford handbook of climate change and society (pp. 232–250). New York, NY. Oxford University Press
  • Fraser, N., & Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution or recognition: A political-philosophical exchange. London: Verso.
  • Gardiner, S. M. (2013a). The desperation argument for geoengineering. PS: Political Science & Politics, 46(1), 28–33.
  • Gardiner, S. M. (2013b). Why geoengineering is not a ‘Global Public Good’, and why it is ethically misleading to frame it as one. Climatic Change, 121(3), 513–525.
  • Gardiner, S. M. (2013c). Geoengineering and moral schizophrenia. In: W. Burns & A. Strauss (Eds.), Climate change geoengineering: Philosophical perspectives, legal issues, and governance frameworks (pp. 11–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Goodin, R. E. (2007). Enfranchising all affected interests, and its alternatives. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 35(1), 40–68.
  • Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Horton, J, & Keith, D. (2016). Solar geoengineering and obligations to the global poor. In: C. J. Preston (Ed.), Climate justice and geoengineering: Ethics and policy in the atmospheric Anthropocene (pp. 79-92). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield International.
  • Hourdequin, M. (2015). Recognizing climate losses. Conference paper (unpublished), Presented at the Second Buffalo Workshop on Ethics and Adaptation: Loss, Damage, and Harm.  University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
  • Hourdequin, M. (2016). Justice, recognition and climate change. In: C. Preston (Ed.), Climate justice and geoengineering: Ethics and policy in the atmospheric anthropocene (pp. 33–48). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield International.
  • Hourdequin, M. (2018). Geoengineering justice: the role of recognition. Science, Technology, And Human Values. 10.1177/0162243918802893
  • Jamieson, D. (1996). Ethics and intentional climate change. Climatic Change, 33(3), 323–336.
  • Kortetmäki, T. (2016). Reframing climate justice: A three-dimensional view on just climate negotiations. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 19(3), 320–334.
  • Kortetmäki, T. (2017). Justice in and to nature: An application of the broad framework of environmental and ecological justice. Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research. Vol. 587. Retrieved from http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-39-7127-4.
  • LeBar, M., & Slote, M. (2016). Justice as a virtue. In: E. N. Zalta (Ed.). The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2016 Edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/justice-virtue/. Accessed March 5, 2018.
  • Lenferna, A. 2017. The costs of solar geoengineering. Ethics & International Affairs online blog https://www.ethicsandinternationalaffairs.org/2017/costs-of-geoengineering/. Accessed March 6, 2018.
  • McShane, K. (2017). Values and harms in loss and damage. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 20(2), 129–142.
  • Medina, J. (2013). The epistemology of resistance: Gender and racial oppression, epistemic injustice, and the social imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Näsström, S. (2011). The challenge of the all‐affected principle. Political Studies, 59(1), 116–134.
  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2009). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Preston, C. J. (2017). Challenges and opportunities for understanding non-economic loss and damage. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 20(2), 143–155.
  • Schlosberg, D. (2007). Defining environmental justice: Theories, movements, and nature. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Shrader-Frechette, K. (2002). Environmental justice: Creating equality, reclaiming democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Sjöstrand, M., Eriksson, S., Juth, N., & Helgesson, G. (2013). Paternalism in the name of autonomy. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine, 38(6), 710–724.
  • Whyte, K. P. (2011). The recognition dimensions of environmental justice in Indian country. Environmental Justice, 4(4), 199–205.
  • Whyte, K. P. (2012a). Indigenous peoples, solar radiation management, and consent. In: C. Preston (Ed.), Engineering the climate: The ethics of solar radiation management (pp. 65–76). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
  • Whyte, K. P. (2012b). Now this! indigenous sovereignty, political obliviousness and governance models for SRM research. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 15(2), 172–187.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.