References
- Azar, C., & Sandén, B. A. (2011). The elusive quest for technology-neutral policies. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 135–139. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.03.003
- BBC. (2000). Reith Lectures 2000: Respect for the Earth Lecture 6: A royal view – The Prince of Wales – Highgrove. http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/rmhttp/radio4/transcripts/20000517_reith.pdf
- Berg, P. (2008). Meetings that changed the world: Asilomar 1975: DNA modification secured. Nature, 455(7211), 290–291. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/455290a
- Bioteknologirådet [The Norwegian Biotechnology Advisory Board]. (2018). The Gene Technology Act – Invitation to Public Debate. http://www.bioteknologiradet.no/filarkiv/2010/07/genteknologiloven-engelsk-hele-for-web-v-2.pdf
- Callaway, E. (2018). CRISPR plants now subject to tough GM laws in European Union. Nature, 560(7716), 16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-05814-6
- Carton, W. (2016). Money for nothin’ and coal for free: ‘Technology neutrality’ and biomass development under the Flemish tradable green certificate scheme. Geoforum, 70, 69–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.02.010
- Charlier, C., & Rainelli, M. (2002). Hormones, risk management, precaution and protectionism: An analysis of the dispute on hormone-treated beef between the European Union and the United States. European Journal of Law and Economics, 14(2), 83–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016527107739
- Christiansen, A. T., Andersen, M. M., & Kappel, K. (2019). Are current EU policies on GMOs justified? Transgenic Research, 28(2), 267–286. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-019-00120-x
- Conko, G., Kershen, D. L., Miller, H., & Parrott, W. A. (2016). A risk-based approach to the regulation of genetically engineered organisms. Nature Biotechnology, 34(5), 493–503. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3568
- Court of Justice of the European Union. (2018). Judgment in Case C-528/16, 25 July 2018. http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?docid=204387&text=&dir=&doclang=EN&part=1&occ=first&mode=DOC&pageIndex=0&cid=7225444
- Davison, J., & Ammann, K. (2017). New GMO regulations for old: Determining a new future for EU crop biotechnology. GM Crops & Food, 8(1), 13–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2017.1289305
- Eriksson, D., & Ammann, K. H. (2017). A universally acceptable view on the adoption of improved plant breeding techniques. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 1999. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01999
- Eriksson, D., De Andrade, E., Bohanec, B., Chatzopolou, S., Defez, R., Eriksson, N. L., Van Der Meer, P., Van Der Meulen, B., Ritala, A., Sági, L., Schiemann, J., Twardowski, T., & Vaněk, T. (2018). Why the European Union needs a national GMO opt-in mechanism. Nature Biotechnology, 36(1), 18–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4051
- Eriksson, D., De Andrade, E., Bohanec, B., Chatzopolou, S., Defez, R., Eriksson, N. L., Van Der Meer, P., Van Der Meulen, B., Ritala, A., Sági, L., Schiemann, J., Twardowski, T., & Vaněk, T. (2019). Implementing an EU opt-in mechanism for GM crop cultivation. EMBO Reports, 20, e48036. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201948036
- Eriksson, D., Harwood, W., Hofvander, P., Jones, H., Rogowsky, P., Stöger, E., & Visser, R. G. F. (2018). A welcome proposal to amend the GMO legislation of the EU. Trends in Biotechnology, 36(11), 1100–1103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.05.001
- General Court of the European Union. (2013). PRESS RELEASE No 160/13. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_CJE-13-160_en.htm
- Gentekniknämnden [The Swedish Gene Technology Advisory Board]. (2018). Vägledning för Gentekniknämndens etiska bedömningar [in Swedish]. https://www.genteknik.se/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/050_2018-GTN-Vägledning-för-nämndens-etiska-bedömningar.pdf
- Greenberg, B. A. (2016). Rethinking technology neutrality. Minnesota Law Review, 100(4), 1495–1562.
- Hansson, S. O. (2016). How to be cautious but open to learning: Time to update biotechnology and GMO legislation. Risk Analysis, 36(8), 1513–1517. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12647
- Hildebrandt, M., & Tielemans, L. (2013). Data protection by design and technology neutral law. Computer Law and Security Review, 29(5), 509–521. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2013.07.004
- Kanter, J. (2012, January 16). BASF to stop selling genetically modified products in Europe. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/17/business/global/17iht-gmo17.html
- Kim, J., & Kim, J. S. (2016). Bypassing GMO regulation with CRISPR gene editing. Nature Biotechnology, 34, 1014–1015. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3680
- Koops, B.-J. (2006). Should ICT regulation be technology-neutral. In: B.-J. Koops (Ed.), Starting points for ICT regulation: Deconstructing prevalent policy one-liners (pp. 77–108). TMC Asser Press.
- Kuzma, J. (2016). Reboot the debate on genetic engineering. Nature, 531(7593), 165–167. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/531165a
- Macdonald, P. (2014). Genetically modified organisms regulatory challenges and science: A Canadian perspective. Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit, 9(Suppl. 1), 59–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00003-014-0893-9
- Malmqvist, E. (2007). Analysing our qualms about ‘designing’ future persons: Autonomy, freedom of choice, and interfering with nature. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 10(4), 407–417. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-007-9052-8
- Masip, G., Sabalza, M., Pérez-Massot, E., Banakar, R., Cebrian, D., Twyman, R. M., Capell, T., Albajes, R., & Christou, P. (2013). Paradoxical EU agricultural policies on genetically engineered crops. Trends in Plant Science, 18(6), 312–324. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2013.03.004
- McHughen, A., & Smyth, S. (2008). US regulatory system for genetically modified [genetically modified organism (GMO), rDNA or transgenic] crop cultivars. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 6(1), 2–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2007.00300.x
- Miller, H. I. (2010). The regulation of agricultural biotechnology: Science shows a better way. New Biotechnology, 27(5), 628–634. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2010.06.017
- Munthe, C. (2017). Precaution and ethics: Handling risks, uncertainties and knowledge gaps in the regulation of new biotechnologies. Swiss Federal Office for Buildings and Publications and Logistics (FOBL.
- Myskja, B. K., & Myhr, A. I. (2020). Non-safety assessments of genome-edited organisms: Should they be included in regulation? Science & Engineering Ethics, 26(5), 2601–2627. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00222-4
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2015). International summit on human gene editing: A global discussion. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17226/21913.
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2016). Gene drives on the Horizon: Advancing science, navigating uncertainty, and aligning research with public values. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17226/23405.
- National Research Council. (2002). Environmental effects of transgenic plants: The scope and adequacy of regulation. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17226/10258.
- Netherlands Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment. (2017). Proposal for discussion on actions to improve the exemption mechanism for genetically modified plants under Directive 2001/18/EC.
- Ohm, P. (2010). The argument against technology-neutral surveillance laws. Texas Law Review, 88(7), 1685–1713.
- Råd, D. E. (2019). Udtalelse fra Det Etiske Råd: GMO og etik i en ny tid [in Danish]. http://www.etiskraad.dk/~/media/Etisk-Raad/Etiske-Temaer/Natur-klima-og-foedevarer/GMO-2019/DER_Udtalelse_GMO_og_etik_i_en_ny_tid_m_baggrundsnotater.pdf?la=da
- Ramachandran, G., Wolf, S. M., Paradise, J., Kuzma, J., Hall, R., Kokkoli, E., & Fatehi, L. (2011). Recommendations for oversight of nanobiotechnology: Dynamic oversight for complex and convergent technology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 13(4), 1345–1371. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-011-0233-2
- Reed, C. (2007). Taking sides on technology neutrality. SCRIPT-ed, 4(3), 263–284. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2966/scrip.040307.263
- Reuters. (2021, January 18). France backs non-GMO regulation for crop gene-editing in EU. https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL8N2JT4A3
- Ricroch, A. E., Ammann, K., & Kuntz, M. (2016). Editing EU legislation to fit plant genome editing. EMBO Reports, 17(10), 1365–1369. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201643099
- Sandin, P., Munthe, C., & Edvardsson Bjornberg, K. (2018). Technology neutrality and the regulation of agricultural biotechnology. In S. Springer & H. Grimm (Eds.), Professionals in Food Chains: EurSafe 2018, Vienna Austria, 13-16 June 2018 (pp. 223–228). Wageningen Academic Publishers.
- Tagliabue, G. (2016). The necessary ‘GMO’ denialism and scientific consensus. Journal of Science Communication, 15(4), Y01. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22323/2.15040401
- Tagliabue, G. (2018). Reject the ‘gmo’ fallacy, in terms of both safety concerns and socioeconomic issues. Geographical Review, 108(1), e1–e5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/gere.12293
- Vatican Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. (1987) . Instruction on respect for human life in its origin and on the dignity of procreation. Vatican Press.
- Zetterberg, C., & Edvardsson Bjornberg, K. (2017). Time for a new EU regulatory framework for GM crops? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 30(3), 325–347. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-017-9664-9