A Kantian Perspective on Individual Responsibility for Sustainability

References

• Anderson, R. (2009). Confessions of a radical industrialist: Profits, people, purpose – Doing business by respecting the earth. with Robin White. St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson-Gold, S. (2003). Objective value in environmental ethics: Towards a reconstituted anthropocentric ethic. Social Philosophy Today, 18, 111–124. https://doi.org/10.5840/socphiltoday2002188
   Google Scholar
• Aurelius, M. (2011). Meditations, with selected correspondence ( R. Hard, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baatz, C. (2014). Climate change and individual duties to reduce GHG emissions. Ethics, Policy and Environment, 17(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2014.885406
   Google Scholar
• Broome, J. (2008). The ethics of climate change: Pay now or pay more later? Scientific American, 298(6), 96–100, 102. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0608-96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C. A. (2010). Fall). Kantianism and mere means. Environmental Ethics, 32(3), 267–284. https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics201032331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budolfson, M. (2013, July). Collective action, climate change, and the ethical significance of futility. Version 4.0. Abbreviated for the Stanford Political Theory Workshop. http://www.budolfson.com/papers.
   Google Scholar
• Callicott, J. B. (1989). In defense of the land ethic: Essays in environmental philosophy. SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. (2020, February 14). How climate experts think about raising children who will inherit a planet in crisis. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/on-parenting/how-climate-experts-think-about-raising-children-who-will-inherit-a-planet-in-crisis/2020/02/14/b4f3405a-4e69-11ea-b721-9f4cdc90bc1c_story.html
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, M. (1989). On social facts. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, M. (2008). Social convention revisited. Topoi, 27(1–2), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-008-9032-5
   Google Scholar
• Gillroy, J. M. (1998). Kantian ethics and environmental policy argument: Autonomy, ecosystem integrity and our duties to nature. Ethics and the Environment, 3(2), 131–155.
   Google Scholar
• Gillroy, J. M. (2000). Justice and nature: Kantian philosophy, environmental policy and the law. Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, T. (1998). Political theory and ecological values. St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. and Cureton, A. (2021). In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Kant’s Moral Philosophy: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Spring. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/kant-moral/
   Google Scholar
• Kain, P. (2010). Duties regarding animals. In L. Denis (Ed.), Kant’s metaphyiscs of morals: A critical guide (pp. 210–233). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. (1966). Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals. In (M. J. Gregor Ed. & Trans.), Practical philosophy (vol. 4, p. 421). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kavka, G. (1978). The futurity problem. In R. I. Sikora & B. Barry (Eds.), Obligations to future generations (pp. 186–203). Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• King, M. L. (1963). Letter from a Birmingham jail, 16 April 1963. http://www.africa.upenn.edu/Articles_Gen/Letter_Birmingham.html
   Google Scholar
• Korsgaard, C. (1996). The sources of normativity. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Korsgaard, C. (2018). Fellow creatures: Our obligations to the other animals. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, M. (2011). Eco-republic: What the ancients can teach us about ethics, virtue and sustainable living. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leopold, A. (1949). A sand country almanac. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. (1969). Convention. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Millikan, R. (2005). Language: A biological model. Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Millikan, R. (2008). A difference of some consequence between conventions and rules. Topoi, 27(1–2), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-008-9026-3
   Google Scholar
• Naess, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement: A summary. Inquiry, 16(1–4), 95–100. Reprinted in Sessions, G. (Ed.), (1995). Deep Ecology for the 21st Century. Boston: Shambhala. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201747308601682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, O. (1998). Kant on duties regarding nonrational nature, II: Necessary anthropocentrism and contingent speciesism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume, 72(1), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8349.00043
   Google Scholar
• Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schönfelt, M. (2010). The metaphysics of sustainability: Kant’s categorial imperative. In J. Lee (Ed.), Sustainability and health (pp. 1–18). Ria University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2010). It’s not my fault: Global warming and individual moral obligations. In S. Gardiner, S. Caney, D. Jamieson, & H. Shue (Eds.), Climate ethics (pp. 332–347). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soll, D. (2013). Empire of water: An environmental and political history of the New York City water supply. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Speth, J. G. (2012). America the possible: A manifesto for a new economy. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Svoboda, T. (2014). A reconsideration of indirect duties regarding non-human organisms. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 17(2), 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-013-9438-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svoboda, T. (2016). Environmental philosophy as a way of life. Ethics and the Environment, 21(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.2979/ethicsenviro.21.1.02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. (2009). Identity and obligation in a transgenerational polity. In A. Gosseries & L. Meyer (Eds.), Intergenerational Justice (pp. 25–49). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. (2016). Obligations of justice and the interests of the dead. International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 30(2), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.5840/ijap201712374
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. (2011). Climate, imagination, Kant, and situational awareness. Journal of Global Ethics, 7(2), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2011.590275
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. (1997). Sustainability as a norm. Society for Philosophy and Technology. Quarterly Electronic Journal, 2(2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.5840/techne19972230
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. (2010). The agrarian vision: Sustainability and environmental ethics. University Press of Kentucky.
   Google Scholar
• Timmerman, J. (2005). When the tail wags the dog: Animal welfare and indirect duty in Kantian ethics. Kantian Review, 10(1), 128–149. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1369415400002168
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (1987). Our common future. Report of the United Nations World Commission on the Environment and Development. Chaired by G. H. Brundtland. http://www.un-documents.net/ocf-02.htm
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, K. (1993). Reconstructing judgment: Emotion and moral judgment. Hypatia, 8(3), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1993.tb00036.x
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, K. (2019a). A theory of the relational self: The cumulative network model of the self. Humana Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies, 12(36), 189–220. https://www.humanamente.eu/index.php/HM/article/view/287
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, K. (2019b). The network self: Relation, process, and personal identity. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, A. (1998). Kant on duties regarding nonrational nature. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume, 72(1), 189–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8349.00042
   Google Scholar