Meso Evaluation for SDGs’ Complexity and Ethics

References

• Abbott, K. W. (2014). Strengthening the transnational regime complex for climate change. Transnational Environmental Law, 3(1), 55–88. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102513000502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aeberhard, A., & Rist, S. (2009). Transdisciplinary co-production of knowledge in the development of organic agriculture in Switzerland. Ecological Economics, 68(4), 1171–1181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, C., Metternicht, G., & Wiedmann, T. (2016). National pathways to the sustainable development goals (SDGs): A comparative review of scenario modelling tools. Environmental Science and Policy, 66, 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2012). Stewards, mediators, and catalysts: Toward a model of collaborative leadership. The Innovation Journal, 17(1), 2–21. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.299.6717&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, W. B. (2014). Complexity and the economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Avelino, F., Wittmayer, J. M., Kemp, R., & Haxeltine, A. (2017). Game-changers and transformative social innovation. Ecology and Society, 22(4), 41. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09897-220441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, A. V., Duflo, E., Glennerster, R., & Kothari, D. (2020). Improving immunisation coverage in rural India: Clustered randomised controlled evaluation of immunisation campaigns with and without incentives. BMJ, 340(may17 1), c2220. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c2220
   Google Scholar
• Beckert, J. (2016). Imagined futures: Fictional expectations and capitalist dynamics. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. A. (2010, March). Governance with/out government. False promises or flawed premises? (SFB-Governance Working Paper Series, No. 23). Berlin: Research Center (SFB) 700.
   Google Scholar
• Bos, J. J., Brown, R. R., & Farrelly, M. A. (2013). A design framework for creating social learning situations. Global Environmental Change, 23(2), 398–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brignall, S., & Modell, S. (2000). An institutional performance measurement and management in the new public sector. Management Accounting Research, 11(3), 281–306. https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.2000.0136
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D. (2013). Evaluating complex social interventions in a complex world. Evaluation, 19(3), 217–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389013495617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabrera, D., Colosi, L., & Lobdell, C. (2008). Systems thinking. Evaluation and Program Planning, 31(3), 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairney, P. (2019). The UK government’s imaginative use of evidence to make policy. British Politics, 14, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-017-0068-2
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, P., & Weible, C. M. (2017). The new policy sciences: Combining the cognitive science of choice, multiple theories of context, and basic and applied analysis. Policy Sciences, 50(4), 619–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-017-9304-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell, S. E. M., & Mays, N. (2012). Studying policy implementation using a macro, meso and micro frame analysis: The case of the collaboration for leadership in applied health research & care (CLAHRC) programme nationally and in North West London. Health Research Policy and Systems, 10(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-10-32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Camaren, P., & Swilling, M. (2014). Linking complexity and sustainability theories: Implications for modeling sustainability transitions. Sustainability, 6(3), 1594–1622. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6031594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colander, D., & Kupers, R. (2014). Complexity and the art of public policy – Solving society’s problems from the bottom up. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. (1987). Microfoundations and macrosocial behavior. In G. Alexander, Münch, & Smelser (Eds.), The micro-macro link (pp. 153–173). University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Haan, J. (2006). How emergence arises. Ecological Complexity, 3(4), 293–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2007.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dopfer, K., Foster, J., & Potts, J. (2004). Micro-meso-macro. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14(3), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-004-0193-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dopfer, K., & Potts, J. (2004). Evolutionary realism: A new ontology for economics. Journal of Economic Methodology, 11(2), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501780410001694127
   Google Scholar
• Dosi, G., Napoletano, M., Roventini, A., & Treibich, T. (2017). Micro and macro policies in the Keynes+Schumpeter evolutionary models. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 27(1), 63–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-016-0466-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dube, K., & Nhamo, G. (2020). Major global aircraft manufacturers and emerging responses to the SDGs Agenda. In G. Nhamo, G. Odularu, & V. Mjimba (Eds.), Scaling up SDGs implementation. Emerging cases from state, development and private sectors(pp. 99–113). Springer, Sustainable Development Goals Series.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlop, C. A., & Radaelli, C. (2018). The lessons of policy learning: Types, triggers, hindrances and pathologies. Policy & Politics, 46(2), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557318X15230059735521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easterly, W. (2015). The trouble with the sustainable development goals. Current History, 114(775), 322–324. https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2015.114.775.322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsner, W. (2007). Why meso? On “aggregation” and “emergence”, and why and how the meso level is essential in social economics. Forum for Social Economics, 36(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12143-007-0001-3
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J. (2015). Mechanisms. In Explaining social behavior: More nuts and bolts for the social sciences (pp. 23–39). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107763111.004
   Google Scholar
• FAO. (2018). Transforming food and agriculture to achieve food security, Rome. Author. http://www.fao.org/3/I9900EN/i9900en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Feola, G. (2020). Capitalism in sustainability transitions research: Time for a critical turn? Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 35,241–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.02.005
   Google Scholar
• Forss, K., Marra, M., & Schwartz, R. (eds.). (2011). Evaluating the complex. Beyond attribution and contribution. Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Frantzeskaki, N., Kabisch, N., & McPhearson, T. (Eds.). (2016). Advancing urban environmental governance: Understanding theories, practices and processes shaping urban sustainability and resilience. Environmental Science & Policy, 62, 1–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haanpaa, L. (2005, September 9–12). Structures in sustainable consumption research: Macro- and micro-level factors affecting environmentally responsible consumption. Conference Paper presented at ‘Rethinking Inequalities’, 7th Conference of the European Sociological Association, Torun, Poland. (available from author).
   Google Scholar
• Hara, K., Uwasu, M., Kobayashi, H., Kurimoto, S., Yamanaka, S., Shimoda, Y., & Umeda, Y. (2012). Enhancing meso level research in sustainability science—challenges and research needs. Sustainability, 4(8), 1833–1847. https://doi.org/10.3390/su4081833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, J., Jill, J., Frantzeskaki, P., & Berry, M. (2019). Understanding high-end climate change: From impacts to co-creating integrated and transformative solutions. Regional Environmental Change, 19(3), 621–627.
   Google Scholar
• Hedström, P., & Swedberg, R. (Eds.). (1998). Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helbing, D., & Kirman, A. (2013). Rethinking economics using complexity theory. Social Science Research Network.
   Google Scholar
• Hickel, J. (2015). Five reasons to think twice about the UN’s sustainable development goals. Africa at LSE.
   Google Scholar
• Hildén, M., Jordan, A., & Huitema, D. (2017). Special issue on experimentation for climate change solutions editorial: The search for climate change and sustainability solutions - The promise and the pitfalls of experimentation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 169(15), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.019
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A. O. (1967). Development projects observed. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, M. G. (2000). Evolution and institutions: On evolutionary economics and the evolution of economics. Cheltenham, UK and Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hölscher, K., Frantzeskaki, N., & Loorbach, D. (2019). Steering transformations under climate change: Capacities for transformative climate governance and the case of Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Regional Environmental Change, 19, 791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1329-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C., Rothstein, H., & Baldwin, R. (2001). The government of risk: Understanding risk regulation regimes. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Icsu, I. S. S. C. (2015). Review of the sustainable development goals: The science perspective. International Council for Science (ICSU).
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., Huitema, D., Schoenefeld, van Asselt, J. H., & Forster, J. (2018). Governing climate change polycentrically (pp. 3–26). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108284646.002
   Google Scholar
• Jost, J., Berschinger, N., & Olbrich, E. (2010). Emergence. New Ideas in Psychology,28, 265–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khaneman, D. (2012). Thinking, fast and slow. Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Koehler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Onsongo, E., & Wieczorek, A. J. (2017). A research agenda for the Sustainability Transitions Research Network,STRN Working Group. STRN.
   Google Scholar
• Kowaleski-Jones, L. (2011). The multiple contexts of food insecurity: Evaluating the impact on child energy balance, study conducted by the University of Utah, under a cooperative research agreement with USDA’s Economic Research Service (ERS) Food Assistance and Nutrition Research Program (FANRP): Agreement number 58-5000-6-0110 (ERS project representative: Jessica Todd). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of ERS or USDA. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1167/9307455cd49c3b1028603dee08fdd347ef70.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Le Blanc, D. (2015). Towards integration at last? The sustainable development goals as a network of targets. Sustainable Development, 23(3), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levers, M.-J. D. (2013). Philosophical paradigms, grounded theory, and perspectives on emergence. Sage Open, 3(4), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013517243
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of «muddling through. Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/973677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D., & Rotmans, J. (2006). Managing transitions for sustainable development. In X. Olsthoorn & A. J. Wieczorek (Eds.), Understanding industrial transformation (Vol. 44, pp. 187–206). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lopes, J., Moraes Reis, R., Ho Bech, L., Gaivizzo, G., Filho, S. R., & Saito, C. F. (2020). The contribution of community-based recycling cooperatives to a cluster of SDGs in semi-arid brazialian peri-urban settlements. In G. Nhamo, G. Odularu, & V. Mjimba (Eds.), Scaling up SDGs implementation. Emerging cases from state, development and private sectors(pp. 141–154). Springer, Sustainable Development Goals Series.
   Google Scholar
• Luederitz, C., Schäpke, N., Wiek, A., Lang, D. J., Bergmann, M., Bos, J. J., … Westley, F. R. (2017). Learning through evaluation – A tentative evaluative scheme for sustainability transition experiments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 169, 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.005
   Google Scholar
• Marra, M. (2011a). Micro, meso, and macro dimensions of change: A new agenda for the evaluation of structural policies. In K. Forss, M. Marra, & S. Robert (Eds.), Evaluating the complex, attribution, contribution and beyond. Comparative policy evaluation (Vol. 18, pp. 315–334). Transaction Publishers, US. ISBN: 9781412818469
   Google Scholar
• Marra, M. (2011b). Some insights from complexity science for the evaluation of complex policies. In K. Forss, M. Marra, & R. Schwartz (Eds.), Evaluating the complex, attribution, contribution and beyond (pp. 315–334). ISBN:9781412818469.
   Google Scholar
• Marra, M. (in press). A behavioral design to reform Italy’s evaluation policy. American Journal of Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214020972791
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. (1968). Social theory and social structure. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. A., & Wyborn, C. (2020). Co-production in global sustainability: Histories and theories. Environmental Science & Policy, 113, 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.01.016
   Google Scholar
• Morita, K., Okitasari, M., & Masuda, H. (2020). Analysis of national and local governance systems to achieve the sustainable development goals: Case studies of Japan and Indonesia. Sustainability Science, 15, 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00739-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nederhand, J., Klijn, E.-H., Van Der Steen, M., & Van Twist, M. (2019). The governance of self-organization: Which governance strategy do policy officials and citizens prefer? Policy Sciences, 52(2), 233–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9342-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. (2018). Collective action on business standards, goals, and metrics to achieve scale and impact for the SDGs. In R. M. Desai, H. Kato, H. Kharas, & J. W. McArthur (Eds.), From summits to solutions. Innovations in implementing the sustainable development goals(pp. 80–105). The Brookings Institutions.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, Y.-K. (1986). Mesoeconomics. A micro-macro analysis. Wheatsheaf Books.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2017a). Measuring distance to the SDG targets. An assessment of where OECD countries stand June 2017, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2017b). Partnerships to enhance policy coherence for sustainable development. in OECD, policy coherence for sustainable development 2017: Eradicating poverty and promoting prosperity. Cap. 5 Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozawa, T. (1999). Organizational efficiency and structural change: A meso-level analysis. In G. Boyd & H. J. Dunning (Eds.), Structural change and cooperation in the global economy (pp. 160–190)). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. (2013). The science of evaluation: A realist manifesto. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M., & Jackson, T. (2008). Community action: A force for social change? Some conceptual observations. RESOLVE working paper 01-08. Retrieved August 28, 2009, from http://www.surrey.ac.uk/resolve/publications/index.php?pubCat_ID=4
   Google Scholar
• Potts, J. (2001). The New Evolutionary Microeconomics: Complexity, competence, and adaptive behaviour. UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Regonini, G. (2017). Governmentalities without policy capacity. In Policy Sciences, 50(2), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-017-9283-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, L., Sutton, P., & Hunter, C. (2010). Theorizing the meso level: The household as a crucible of pro-environmental behavior. Progress in Human Geography, 34(3), 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132509346994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, P. (2008). Using program theory to evaluate complicated and complex aspects of interventions. Evaluation, 14(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389007084674
   Google Scholar
• Rosenau, J. N. (2003). Distant proximities: Dynamics beyond globalization. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rossignoli, D., & Balestri, S. (2018). Food security and democracy: Do inclusive institutions matter? Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue Canadienne D’études Du Développement,39, 39(2), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2017.1382335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabel, C. F., & Zeitlin, J. (Eds.). (2010). Experimentalist governance in the European Union. Towards a new architecture. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sayre, N. F. (2005). Ecological and geographical scale: Parallels and potential for integration. Progress in Human Geography, 29(3), 276–290. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132505ph546oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmieg, G., Meyer, E., Schrickel, I., Herberg, J., Caniglia, G., Vilsmaier, U., Laubichler, M., Hörl, E., & Lang, D. (2018). Modeling normativity in sustainability: A comparison of the sustainable development goals, the Paris agreement, and the papal encyclical. Sustainability Science, 13(3), 785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0504-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. (1999). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1969). The sciences of the artificial (1st ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stafford-Smith, M., Griggs, D., Gaffney, O., Ullah, F., Reyers, B., Kanie, N., Stigson, B., Shrivastava, P., Leach, M., & O’Connell, D. (2017). Integration: The key to implementing the sustainable development goals. Sustainability Science, 12(6), 911–919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0383-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, C. H. (1977). Using social research in public policy making. Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Westhorp, G. (2012). Using complexity-consistent theory for evaluating complex systems. Evaluation, 18(4), 405–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389012460963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, X., Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (Eds). (2018). Policy capacity and governance: Assessing governmental competences and capabilities in theory and practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ylikoski, P. (2016). Thinking with the coleman boat. The IAS Working Paper Series. Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, The Institute for Analytical Sociology.
   Google Scholar
• Zeitlin, J. (2016). EU experimentalist governance in times of crisis. West European Politics, 39(5), 1073–1094. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2016.1181873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar