Ubuntu and the Problem of Belonging

References

• Anderson, J. (2004). The ties that bind? Self‐ and place‐identity in environmental direct action. Ethics, Place & Environment, 7(1–2), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/1366879042000264769
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. 1957. PhysicsI: Books. Eds. Wicksteed, P. H., and Cornford, F. M. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/DLCL.aristotle-physics.1957
   Google Scholar
• Behrens, K. (2010). Exploring African holism with respect to the environment. Environmental Values, 19(4), 465–484. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327110X531561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bewaji, J. A. I. (2004). Ethics and morality in yoruba culture. In K. Wiredu (Ed.), A companion to African philosophy (pp. 396–401). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470997154.ch32
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, A. (2006). Globalization, environmental policy and the ethics of place. Ethics, Place & Environment, 9(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668790600694535
   Google Scholar
• Callicott, J. B. (1999). Beyond the land ethic: More essays in environmental philosophy. State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chimakonam, J. O. (2016). The end of Ubuntu or its beginning in Matolino-Kwindingwi-Metz debate: An exercise in conversational philosophy. South African Journal of Philosophy, 35(2), 224–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/02580136.2016.1174921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuwa, L. T. (2014). African Indigenous ethics in global bioethics: Interpreting ubuntu. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Crippen, M. (2021). Africapitalism, ubuntu. and sustainability. Environmental Ethics, 43(3), 235–259. https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics202111929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darwin, C. (1861). The origin of species by means of natural selection (6th ed.). D. Appleton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, R. (1989). The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delapp, K. (2011). The view from somewhere: Anthropocentrism in metaethics. Anthropocentrism: Humans, Animals, Environment, 12, 37–58. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004187948.i-348.19
   Google Scholar
• Du Plessis, C. (2012). Towards a regenerative paradigm for the built environment. Building Research & Information, 40(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2012.628548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eze, M. O. (2008). What is African communitarianism? Against consensus as a regulative ideal. South African Journal of Philosophy, 27(4), 386–399. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajpem.v27i4.31526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortunato, L. (2019). Lineal kinship organization in cross-specific perspective. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 374(1780), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gedge, E. (2019). Living entanglement and revisionist ecotheology. Theology and Science, 17(4), 511–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2019.1670965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glidden, D. (1998). Commonplaces. In A. Light & J. Smith (Eds.), Philosophy and Geography III: Philosophies of Place, Discussion Papers in Environmental Philosophy, (pp. 169–190). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, N., & Metz, T. (2017). What can the capabilities approach learn from an ubuntu ethic? A relational approach to development theory. World Development, 97, 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horsthemke, K. (2015). Animal and African Ethics. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Janz, B. B. (2017). Is place a text? In B. B. Janz (Ed.), Place, space and hermeneutics. (pp. 23–34). Springer International Publishing: Contributions to Hermeneutics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52214-2_3.
   Google Scholar
• Jeppson, S. (2016). Flourishing dogs: The case for an individualized conception of welfare and its implications. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics, 29(3), 425–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-016-9612-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kant, I. (1991). The metaphysics of morals. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kumalo, R. S. (2017). The changing landscape of South Africa and implications for practising ubuntu. In J. Dreyer, Y. Dreyer, E. Foley, & M. Nel (Eds.), Practicing ubuntu: Practical theological perspectives on injustice, personhood and human dignity (pp. 22–33). Lit Verlang GmbH & Co. KG Wien.
   Google Scholar
• Louw, D. J. (2019). Rethinking Ubuntu. Ubuntu and the reconstitution of community (pp. 114–130). Indiana University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvh4zgdk
   Google Scholar
• Mallory, C. (2018). What’s in a name? In defense of ecofeminism (not ecological feminisms, feminist ecology, or gender and the environment): Or ‘why ecofeminism need not be ecofeminine—but so what if it is?’. Ethics & the Environment, 23(2), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.2979/ethicsenviro.23.2.03
   Google Scholar
• Malpas, J. (1998). Finding place: Spatiality, locality and subjectivity. In A. Light & J. Smith (Eds.), Philosophy and geography III: Philosophy of place (pp. 21–43). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Masolo, D. A. (2010). Self and community in a changing world. Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matolino, B. (2015). A response to Metz’s reply on the end of ubuntu. South African Journal of Philosophy, 34(2), 214–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/02580136.2015.1035857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matolino, B., & Kwindingwi, W. (2013). The end of ubuntu. South African Journal of Philosophy, 32(2), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/02580136.2013.817637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mbiti, J. S. (1969). African religions and philosophy (2nd ed.). Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Mbiti, J. S. (1991). Introduction to African Religion. Waveland Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Metz, T. (2011). Ubuntu as a moral theory and human rights in South Africa. African Human Rights Law Journal, 11(2), 532–559.
   Google Scholar
• Metz, T. (2012). An African theory of moral status: A relational alternative to individualism and holism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 15(3), 387–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-011-9302-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metz, T. (2017a). Duties towards animals versus rights to culture: An African approach to the conflict in terms of communion. In L. Cordeiro & L. Mitchell (Eds.), Animals, race and multiculturalism (pp. 269–294). The Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Metz, T. (2017b). How to ground animal rights on African values: Reply to horsthemke. Journal of Animal Ethics, 7(2), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.5406/janimalethics.7.2.0163
   Google Scholar
• Metz, T. (2018a). An African theory of good leadership. African Journal of Business Ethics, 12(2), 36–54. https://doi.org/10.15249/12-2-204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metz, T. (2018b). How to ground animal rights on African values: A constructive approach. In E. Etieyibo (Ed.), Method, substance, and the future of African philosophy (pp. 275–290). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Midgley, M. (1994). The ethical primate: Humans, freedom and morality. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, E. (2009). Communitarianism. In J. B. Callicott & R. Frodeman (Eds.), Encyclopedia of ethics and philosophy (Vol. 1, pp. 161–163). Macmillan Reference USA.
   Google Scholar
• Murove, M. F. (2004). An African commitment to ecological conservation: The Shona concepts of ukama and ubuntu. The Mankind Quarterly, 45(2), 195–215. https://doi.org/10.46469/mq.2004.45.2.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, B., & Bruce, H. (1998). Democracy and sense of place values in environmental policy. In A. Light & J. M. Smith (Eds.), Philosophy and geography III: Philosophies of place (pp. 119–145). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Nyarwath, O. (2019). Ubuntu and Oruka’s Humanitarian View of Punishment. Ubuntu and the reconstitution of community (pp. 131–149). Indiana University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvh4zgdk
   Google Scholar
• Plumwood, V. (2002). Decolonising relationships with nature. Pan: Philosophy Activism Nature 2, 7–30.
   Google Scholar
• Praeg, L. (2017). Essential building blocks of the ubuntu debate; or: I write what I must. South African Journal of Philosophy, 36(2), 292–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/02580136.2016.1261442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor, H. (2012). Animal sentience: Where are we and where are we heading. Animals, 2(4), 628–639. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani.2040628
   Google Scholar
• Ramose, M. B. (1999). African philosophy through ubuntu. Mond Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ramose, M. B. (2003). Globalization and Ubuntu. In P. H. Coetzee & A. P. J. Roux (Eds.), The African philosophy reader (2nd ed., pp. 732–762). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ramose, M. B. (2015). Ecology through Ubuntu. In R. Reinhold (Ed.), Environmental values: Emerging from cultures and religions of the ASEAN region (pp. 69–76). Korad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.v. & Guna Chakra Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Samuel, O. S., & Kazeem Fayemi, A. (2019). Afro-communal virtue ethics as a foundation for environmental sustainability in Africa and beyond. South African Journal of Philosophy, 38(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/02580136.2019.1581393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuel, O. S., & Kazeem Fayemi, A. (2020). A critique of Thaddeus Metz’s modal relational account of moral status. Theoria, 67(162), 28–44. https://doi.org/10.3167/th.2020.6716202
   Google Scholar
• Seehawer, M. K. (2018). Decolonising research in a sub-saharan African context: Exploring ubuntu as a foundation for research methodology, ethics and agenda. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(4), 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1432404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuan, Y.F. (1978). Space and place: The perspective of experience. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar