Sufficiency as a Value Standard: From Preferences to Needs

References

• Akenji, L., Bengtsson, M., Toivio, V., Lettenmeier, M., Fawcett, T., Parag, Y., Saheb, Y., Coote, A., Spangenberg, J. H., Capstick, S., Gore, T., Coscieme, L., Wackernagel, M., Kenner, D., & Kolehmainen, J. (2021). 1.5–degree lifestyles: Towards a fair consumption space for all. Aalto University.
   Google Scholar
• Alcott, B. (2022). Comment on Ulrich Brand et al., ‘From planetary to societal boundaries. Sustainability: Science, Practice & Policy, 18(1), 443–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2022.2082124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkire, S. (2002). Valuing freedoms: Sen’s capability approach and poverty reduction. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allwood, J. M., Azevedo, J., Clare, A., Cleaver, C., Cullen, J., Dunant, C., Fellin, T., Hawkins, W., Horrocks, I., Horton, P., Ibell, T., Lin, J., Low, H., Lupton, R., Murray, J., Salamanti, M., Cabrera Serrenho, A., Ward, M., & Zhou, W. (2019). Absolute Zero. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.46075
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, K., Broderick, J. F., & Stoddard, I. (2020). A factor of two: How the mitigation plans of ‘climate progressive’ nations Fall far short of Paris-compliant pathways. Climate Policy, 20(10), 1290–1304. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1728209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelsen, D., & Nielsen, L. (2016). Essentially enough: Elements of a plausible account of sufficientarianism. In C. Fourie & A. Rid (Eds.), What is enough? Sufficiency, justice, and health (pp. 101–120). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baltruszewicz, M., Steinberger, J. K., Paavola, J., Ivanova, D., Brand-Correa, L. I., & Owen, A. (2023). Social outcomes of energy use in the United Kingdom: Household energy footprints and their links to well-being. Ecological Economics, 205, 107686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bärnthaler, R. (2023). Towards eco-social politics: A case study on transformative strategies to overcome form-of-life crises. Environmental Politics, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2023.2180910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bärnthaler, R., & Gough, I. (2023). Provisioning for sufficiency: Envisaging production corridors. Sustainability: Science, Practice & Policy, 19(1), 2218690. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2023.2218690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beachtiger, A., Dryzek, J. S., Mansbridge, J. J., & Warren, M. (2018). The oxford handbook of deliberative democracy (A. Bächtiger, J. S. Dryzek, J. Mansbridge, & M. E. Warren eds.; Illustrated ed.). OUP Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann, F., & Kim, R. E. (2020). The boundaries of the planetary boundary framework: A critical appraisal of approaches to define a ‘safe operating space’ for humanity. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 45(1), 497–521. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012320-080337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boswell, J., Dean, R., & Smith, G. (2022). Integrating citizen deliberation into climate governance: Lessons on robust design from six climate assemblies. Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowles, S. (2017). The moral economy. Yale UP.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, S., & Carlin, W. (2020). The coming battle for the COVID-19 narrative. VOX EU: CEPR Policy Portal. https://voxeu.org/article/coming-battle-covid-19-narrative
   Google Scholar
• Brand, U., Muraca, B., Pineault, É., Sahakian, M., Schaffartzik, A., Novy, A., Streissler, C., Haberl, H., Asara, V., Dietz, K., Lang, M., Kothari, A., Smith, T., Spash, C., Brad, A., Pichler, M., Plank, C., Velegrakis, G. … Görg, C. (2021). From planetary to societal boundaries: An argument for collectively defined self-limitation. Sustainability: Science, Practice & Policy, 17(1), 264–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2021.1940754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braybrooke, D. (1987). Meeting needs. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brock, G. (2009). Global justice: A cosmopolitan account. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brock, G. (2018). Sufficiency and needs-based approaches. The Oxford Handbook of Distributive Justice. Retrieved July 27 2021, from https://www-oxfordhandbooks-com.gate3.library.lse.ac.uk/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199645121.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199645121-e-6
   Google Scholar
• Caney, S. (2012). Just emissions. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 40(4), 255–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caney, S. (2018). Climate change. In S. Olsaretti (Ed.), The oxford handbook of distributive justice (pp. 664–688). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Casal, P. (2007). Why sufficiency is not enough. Ethics, 117(2), 296–326. https://doi.org/10.1086/510692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherry, C., Capstick, S., Demski, C., Mellier, C., Stone, L., & Verfuerth, C. (2021). Citizens’ climate assemblies: Understanding public deliberation for climate policy. The Centre for Climate Change and Social Transformations.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, H. E. (1977). Steady-state economics: The economics of biophysical equilibrium and moral growth. W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, A., Hirsch, D., Padley, M., & Marshall, L. (2015). How much is enough? Reaching social consensus on minimum household needs. Report. Loughborough University.
   Google Scholar
• Di Giulio, A., & Defila, R. (2021). Building the bridge between protected needs and consumption corridors. Sustainability: Science, Practice & Policy, 17(1), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2021.1907056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Giulio, A., & Fuchs, D. (2014). Sustainable consumption corridors: Concept, objections, and responses. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 23(3), 184–192. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.23.S1.6
   Google Scholar
• Doyal, L. (1993). Thinking about human need. New Left Review, 201, 113–128.
   Google Scholar
• Doyal, L., & Gough, I. (1991). A theory of human need. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Druckman, A., & Jackson, T. (2010). The bare necessities: How much household carbon do we really need? Ecological Economics, 69(9), 1794–1804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elstub, S., Farrell, D. M., & Mockler, P. (2021). The scope of climate assemblies: Lessons from the climate assembly UK. Sustainability, 13(11272), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011272
   Google Scholar
• Fine, B. (2013). Economics: Unfit for purpose. Review of Social Economy, 71(3), 373–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2013.799969
   Google Scholar
• Fourie, C. (2016). The sufficiency view: A primer. In C. Fourie & A. Rid (Eds.), What is enough? Sufficiency, justice, and health (pp. 11–29). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frankfurt, H. (1987). Equality as a moral ideal. Ethics, 98(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1086/292913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., Sahakian, M., Gumbert, T., Di Giulio, A., Maniates, M., Lorek, S., & Graf, A. (2021). Consumption corridors: Living a good life within sustainable limits. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gasper, D. (1996). Needs and basic needs - a clarification of foundational concepts for development ethics and policy. The Hague.
   Google Scholar
• Gasper, D. (2007). Conceptualising human needs and wellbeing. In I. Gough & A. J. McGregor (Eds.), Wellbeing in developing countries: From theory to research (pp. 47–70). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goedeme, T., Storms, B., Stockman, S., Penne, T., & Van den Bosch, K. (2015). Pilot project for the development of a common methodology on reference budgets in Europe: The development of a methodology for comparable reference budgets in Europe - final report of the Pilot project. Vol. Contract no. VC/2013/0554. Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, I. (2014). Lists and thresholds: Comparing the doyal-gough theory of human need with Nussbaum’s capabilities approach. In M. Nussbaum & F. Comim (Eds.), Capabilities, gender, equality: Towards fundamental entitlements (pp. 357–381). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, I. (2015). Climate change and sustainable welfare: The centrality of human needs. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 39(5), 1191–1214. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bev039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, I. (2017). Heat, greed and human need: Climate change, capitalism and sustainable wellbeing. Edward Elgar Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, I. (2020). Defining floors and ceilings: The contribution of human needs theory. Sustainability: Science, Practice & Policy, 16(1), 208–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2020.1814033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, F. (2021). Ecological limits: Science, justice, policy, and the good life. Philosophy Compass, 16(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1987). Knowledge and human interests. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L. A. (2003). The political philosophy of needs. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, K., Burchardt, T., & Davis, A. (2022). Richness, insecurity and the welfare state. Journal of Social Policy, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279422000617
   Google Scholar
• Hickel, J. (2020). Quantifying national responsibility for climate breakdown: An equality-based attribution approach for carbon dioxide emissions in excess of the planetary boundary. The Lancet Planetary Health, 4(9), e399–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30196-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hirsch, F. (1995). Social limits to growth. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G. M. (2013). From pleasure machines to moral communities: An evolutionary economics without Homo Economicus. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G., & Hodgson, G. (2021). Liberal Solidarity. Edward Elgar Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, M., & Spash, C. L. (2021). The impacts of climate change mitigation on work for the Austrian economy. SRE - Discussion Papers.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, E., Linnerud, K., Banister, D., Jana Schwanitz, V., & Wierling, A. (2018). The imperatives of sustainable development: Needs, Justice, limits. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Huseby, R. (2020). Sufficiency and the threshold question. The Journal of Ethics, 24, 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-020-09321-7
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2022a). Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2022b). Climate change 2022: Mitigation of climate change.
   Google Scholar
• Machin, A. (2023). Democracy, agony, and rupture: A critique of climate citizens’ assemblies. Politische Vierteljahresschrift. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-023-00455-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, M. (2006). The rich and the poor: The construction of an affluence line from the poverty line. Social Indicators Research, 78, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-7156-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. (2000). Contraction & convergence: The global solution to climate change. Green Books.
   Google Scholar
• Millward-Hopkins, J., Steinberger, J. K., Rao, N. D., & Oswald, Y. (2020). Providing decent living with minimum energy: A global scenario. Global Environmental Change, 65, 102168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. (1993). Non-Relative Virtues: An aristotelian approach. In M. C. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 242–269). Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. (2006). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. The Belknap Press, Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, J. (2011). The overshadowing of needs. In F. Rauschmayer, I. Omann, & J. Frühmann (Eds.), Sustainable development (pp. 25–43). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, J. (2017). Pluralism and incommensurability. In Clive L. Spash (ed.), Routledge handbook of ecological economics: Nature and society (pp. 227–236). Taylor and Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, D. W., Fanning, A. L., Lamb, W. F., & Steinberger, J. K. (2018). A good life for all within planetary boundaries. Nature Sustainability, 1, 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswald, Y., Owen, A., & Steinberger, J. K. (2020). Large inequality in international and intranational energy footprints between income groups and across consumption categories. Nature Energy, 5(3), 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-0579-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswald, Y., Steinberger, J. K., Ivanova, D., & Millward-Hopkins, J. (2021). Global redistribution of income and household energy footprints: A computational thought experiment. Global Sustainability, 4(e4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2021.1
   Google Scholar
• Özkaynak, B., Adaman, F., & Devine, P. (2012). The identity of ecological economics: Retrospects and prospects. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36(5), 1123–1142. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bes021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Princen, T. (2022). Sufficiency and the state: A prospective project. Frontiers in Sustainability 3.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, N. D., & Min, J. (2017). Decent living standards: Material prerequisites for human wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 138(1), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1650-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, N. D., Min, J., & Mastrucci, A. (2019). Energy requirements for decent living in India, Brazil and South Africa. Nature Energy, 4, 1025–1032. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0497-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut economics: Seven ways to think like a 21st-Century Economist. Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Reader, S. (2007). Needs and moral necessity (1st ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns, I. (2017). Having too much. Nomos, 58, 1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns, I. (2019). What, if anything, is wrong with extreme wealth? Journal of Human Development & Capabilities, 20(3), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2019.1633734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robeyns, I. (2022). Why limitarianism? Journal of Political Philosophy, 30(2), 249–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Stuart Chapin, F., Lambin, E. F., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Joachim Schellnhuber, H., Björn, N., de Wit, C. A., Hughes, T., Van der Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sörlin, S., Snyder, P. K., Costanza, R., Svedin, U. … Foley, J. A. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461(7263), 472–475. https://doi.org/10.1038/461472a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Sapp, A. R. (2007). Basic psychological needs: A self-determination theory perspective on the promotion of wellness across development and cultures. In I. Gough & J. A. McGregor (Eds.), Wellbeing in developing countries: From theory to research (pp. 71–92). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shue, H. (1993). Subsistence emissions and luxury emissions. Law & Policy, 15(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.1993.tb00093.x
   Google Scholar
• Shue, H. (2014). Climate justice: Vulnerability and protection. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Röckstrom, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., Biggs, R., Carpenter, S. R., de Vries, W., de Wit, C. A., Folke, C., Gerten, D., Heinke, J., Mace, G. M., Persson, L. M., Ramanathan, V., Reyers, B., & Sörlin, S. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigler, G. J., & Becker, G. S. (1977). De Gustibus non Est disputandum. The American Economic Review, 67(2), 76–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veblen, T. (1994). The theory of the leisure class: An economic study of institutions. Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• WCED. (1987). Our common future - Brundtland report, commission on environment and development. Oxford Paperbacks.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, D. (1987). Needs, values, truth: Essays in the philosophy of value. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, D. (2005). An idea we cannot do without: What difference will it make (eg. To moral, political and environmental philosophy) to recognize and put to use a substantial conception of need? Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 57, 25–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246105057024
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better. Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar